Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients

References

• Teesson M, Hall W, Lynskey M, Degenhardt L. Alcohol- and drug-use disorders in Australia: implications of the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2000;34:206–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony JC, Helzer JE. Syndromes of drug abuse and dependence. In: Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric disorders in America: the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study. New York: The Free Press, 1991:116–54.
   Google Scholar
• Helzer JE, Burnam A, McEvoy LT. Alcohol abuse and dependence. In: Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric disorders in America: the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study. New York: The Free Press, 1991:81–115.
   Google Scholar
• Robins LN, Locke BZ, Regier DA. Overview: psychiatric disorders in America. In: Robins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric disorders in America: the Epidemiologic Catch- ment Area Study. New York: The Free Press, 1991:328–66.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin MD, Hser Y-I, Grella CE. Drug addiction and treatment careers among clients in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:308–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Fort GG, Newman SC, Bland RC. Psychiatric co- morbidity and treatment seeking: sources of selection bias in the study of clinical populations. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181:467–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D et al. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study in the United King- dom: six-month follow-up outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11:324–37.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson AS. Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, eds. Kaplan & Sadock comprehen- sive textbook of psychiatry, vol. II, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2000;2988-90.
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler HR, Del Boca FK, Rounsaville BJ. Co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis predicts three-year outcomes in alco- holics: a post-treatment natural history study. J Stud Alcohol 1996;57:619–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Kouzis AC, Leaf PJ. Influence of co-morbid alcohol and psychiatric disorders on utilisation of mental health services in the National Co-morbidity Study. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1230–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney JW, Moos RH. What works in treatment: effect of setting, duration and amount. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, eds. Principles of addiction medicine, 2nd edn. MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1998:345–52.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Herbert KD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 2000;284:1689–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrady BS, Langenbucher JW. Alcohol treatment and health care system reform. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:737–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien CP, McLellan AT. Myths about the treatment of addiction. Lancet 1996;347:327–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillant G. Natural history of addiction and pathways to recovery. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, eds. Principles of addiction medicine, 2nd edn. MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine Inc., 1998:295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Hall W, Ward J, Mattick R. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment 1: heroin use and crime. In: Ward J, Mattick RP, Hall W, eds. Methadone maintenance treat- ment and other opioid replacement therapies. Singapore: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998:17–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard RL, Craddock G, Flynn PM, Anderson J, Etheridge R. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:261–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe WE. A randomised control trial of recovery training and self-help for opioid addicts in New England and Hong Kong. J Psychoact Drugs 1990;22:197–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward J, Hall W, Mattick RP. Role of maintenance treatment in opioid dependence. Lancet 1999;353:221–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn JY, Booth BM, Loveland Cook CA, Blow FC, Fortney JC. The relationship between mortality and intensity of inpatient alcoholism treatment. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:211–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney JW, Hahn AC, Moos RH. The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: the need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction 1996;91:1773–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney JW, Moos RH. What works in treatment: effect of setting, duration and amount. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, eds. Principles of addiction medicine, 2nd edn. MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine Inc., 1998:345–52.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, McKay JR. Components of successful treatment programs: lessons from the research. In A.W. Graham & T.K. Schultz (Eds) Principles of addiction medicine. Second Edition. Maryland: American Society of Addiction Medicine. Inc., 1998:327–44.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan C, Finney JW. Explaining abstinence rates following treatment for alcohol abuse: a quantitative synthesis of patient, research design and treatment effects. Addiction 1996;91:787–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annis HM. Is inpatient rehabilitation of the alcoholic cost effective? Con position. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse 1986;5:175–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bien TH, Miller WR, Toningan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction 1993;88:315–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattick RP, Jarvis T. An outline for the management of alcohol problems. Quality assurance in the treatment of drug dependence project. Monograph Series no. 20. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Hester RK. Inpatient alcoholism treatment: who benefits? Am Psychol 1986;41:794–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert FS. The effects of type of aftercare follow-up on treatment outcome among alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 1988;49:149–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins JD, Catalano RF. Aftercare in drug abuse treatment. Int J Addict 1985;20:917–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito JR, Donovan DM. Predicting drinking outcome: demography, chronicity, coping and aftercare. Addict Behav 1990;15:553–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychtarik RG, Prue DM, Rapp SR, King AC. Self-efficacy, aftercare and relapse in a treatment programme for alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 1992;53:435–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney JW, Moos RH, Newborn CR. Post treatment experiences and treatment outcome of alcoholic patients six months and two years after hospitalisation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980;48:17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLatchie BH, Lomp KGE. An experimental investigation of the influence of aftercare on alcoholic relapse. Br J Addict 1988;83:1045–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moos RH, King M, Patterson M. Outcomes of residential treatment of substance abuse in hospital versus community based programs. Psychiatr Serv 1996;47:68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich JM, Armor DJ, Braiker HB. The course of alcoholism: four years after treatment. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Walker RD, Donovan DM, Kivlahan DR, O’Leary MR. Length of stay, neuropsychological performance, and after- care: Influences on alcohol treatment outcome. J. Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:900–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito JR, Donovan DM. Aftercare in alcoholism treatment: a review. In: Miller WR, Heather N, eds. Treating addictive behaviours: processes of change. London: Plenum Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Allsop S, Saunders B, Phillips M, Carr A. A trial of relapse prevention with severely dependent male problem drinkers. Addiction 1997;92:61–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KM. Relapse prevention as a psychosocial treat- ment: a review of controlled trials. Exp Clin Psychophar- macol 1996;4:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan DM, Marlatt GA. Behavioural treatment. In: Galanter M, ed. Recent developments in alcoholism, vol 11. Ten years of progress. New York: Plenum Press, 1993:397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Graham K, Annis HM, Brett PJ, Venesoen P. A controlled field trial of group versus individual cognitive-behavioural training for relapse prevention. Addiction 1996;91:1127–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito JR, Donovan DM, Hall JJ. Relapse prevention in alcohol aftercare: effects on drinking outcome, change process, and aftercare attendance. Br J Addict 1988;83:171–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Farrell TJ, Chocquette KA, Cutter HSG, Brown ED, McCourt WF. Behavioural marital therapy with or without additional couples relapse prevention sessions for alcoholics and their wives. J Stud Alcohol 1993;54:652–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson RA, Obert JL, McCann MJ, Marinelli-Casey P. Relapse prevention strategies in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Psychol Addict Behav 1993;7:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsma JM, Maultsby MC, Welsh RJ. Outpatient treatment of alcoholism: a review and comparative study. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH post- treatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58:7–29.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Composite International Diag- nostic Interview (CIDI). Core cersion 2.1. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell T, Sitharthan T, McGrath D, Lang E. The measurement of alcohol dependence and impaired control in community samples. Br J Addict 1994;89:167–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland G, Edwards G, Taylor C, Phillips G, Gossop M, Brady R. The measurement of opiate dependence. Br J Addict 1986;81:485–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selzer ML, Vinokur A, van Rooijen L. A self-administered short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). J Stud Alcohol 1975;36:117–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin DR, Ross HE, Skinner HA. Diagnostic validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. Br J Addict 1989;84:301–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darke S, Ward J, Hall W, Heather N, Wodak A. The Opiate Treatment Index (OTI) Manual. Technical report no. 11. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR. SCLR-90-R: administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the revised version. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological tssessment, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Del Boca FK. Measurement of drinking behaviour using the Form 90 family of instruments. J Stud Alcohol 1994; Suppl 12:112–18.
   Google Scholar
• Monti PM, Abrams DB, Kadden RM, Cooney NL. Treating alcohol dependence: a coping skills training guide. New York: Guilford Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kadden R, Carroll K, Donovan D et al. Cognitive behavioural coping skills therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. Project MATCH Monograph Series vol. 3. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR, Clearly PA. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. J Clin Psychol 1977;33:981–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geffen G, Hoar KJ, O’Hanlon AP, Clark CR, Geffen LB. Performance measures of 16- to 86-year old males and females on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Clin Neuropsychol 1990;4:45–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC). Australian alcohol guidelines: health, risk and benefits. Canberra: NH&MRC, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Hall W, Teesson M, Lynskey M, Degenhardt L. The 12- month prevalence of substance use and ICD-10 substance use disorders in Australian adults: findings from the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Addic- tion 1999;94:1541–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward J, Mattick RP, Hall W, eds. Methadone maintenance treatment and other opioid replacement therapies. Singa- pore: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Rounsaville BJ, Dolinsky ZS, Babor TF, Meyer RE. Psychopathology as a predictor of treatment outcome in alcoholics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:505–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KM. Enhancing retention in clinical trials of psychosocial treatments: practical strategies. In: Onken LS, Blaine JD, Boren JJ, eds. Beyond the therapeutic alliance keeping the drug dependent individual in treatment. NIDA Research Monograph 165, Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, 1997:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Broome KM, Hiller ML, Knight K, Rowan-Sz GA. Programme diversity and treatment reten- tion rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997;11:279–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Anglin MD, Grella CE, Longshore D, Prender- gast M. Drug treatment careers: a conceptual framework and existing research findings. J Subst Abuse Treat 1997;14:1–16.
   Google Scholar