Advanced search
Publication Cover
Drug and Alcohol Review Volume 21, 2002 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
5
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A 'demand side' estimate of the dollar value of the cannabis black market in New Zealand

Chris Wilkins Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
,
Krishna Bhatta Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
&
Sally Casswell Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Pages 145-151 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

  • Caulkins J. What is the average price of an illicit drug? Addiction 1994;89:815-19.
  • Caulkins J, Reuter P. The meaning and utility of drug prices. Addiction 1996;91:1261-4.
  • Abel S, Casswell S. Cannabis policy: issues and options. NZ Med J 1998;367-70.
  • Abel S, Casswell S. Cannabis in New Zealand: policy and prospects. Soc Policy J NZ 1998;10:70-85.
  • Field A, Casswell S. Options for cannabis policy in New Zealand. Soc Policy J NZ 2000; 14:49-64.
  • Walker L, Cocklin C, Blunden G. Cannabis highs and lows: sustaining and dislocating rural communities in Northland. University of Auckland: Department of Geography, 1998.
  • Dawkins K. Cannabis prohibition: taking stock of the evidence. Otago Law Rev 2001;10:39-89.
  • National Drug Intelligence Bureau. Cannabis in New Zealand 2000. Wellington: New Zealand National Drug Intelligence Bureau, 2000.
  • MCCardle H. Organised crime project: report on the Organised Crime Group Survey. Wellington: New Zealand Police, 1999.
  • Reuter P, Kleiman MAR. Risks and prices: an economic analysis of drug enforcement. In: Tonry M, Morris N, eds. Crime and justice: an annual review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
  • Field A, Casswell S. Drugs in New Zealand: a National Survey 1998. University of Auckland: Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, 1999.
  • New Zealand Police. New Zealand Police Annual Reports. Wellington: New Zealand Police, 1991-98.
  • Jessup P. The dope game. New Zealand Herald 1990;2-3.
  • MCLaughlan M Gone North: on the cannabis trail. North South. November, 1996; 117-23.
  • Hill D. Kiwi Green becomes big business. National Business Review 3 April, 1998;11.
  • Pearson L. Every woman and her dog is doing it: lighten up. Grace 2000;53-7.
  • Te Runanga o te Rarawa. Cannabis Project Report 1995.
  • Staff B. A report from cannabis country. North South. April, 1988; 103-9.
  • de Launey C. The real value of a cannabis plant. Alternative Law J 1996;21:127-30.
  • Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence. Australian Illicit Drug Report 1999-2000. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence, 2001.
  • Caputo M, Ostrom B. Potential tax revenue from a regulated marijuana market: a meaningful revenue source. Am J Econ Sociol 1994;53:475-90.
  • Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority. Drugs, Crime and Society (The Cleeland Report). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1989.
  • Clements K, Daryal M. The economics of marijuana consumption. Perth: Economic Research Centre, University of Western Australia, 1999.
  • Wessinger C, Wodarski JS. Accuracy of national surveys of drug use: a comparison with local studies. J Alcohol Drug Educ 1994;39:62-73.
  • Rhodes W, Langenbahn S, Kling R, Scheiman P. What America's users spend on illegal drugs, 1988-1995. Rock-ville, MD: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1997.
  • Rhodes W, Layne M, Johnston P, Hozik L. What America's users spend on illegal drugs 1988-1998. Rockville, MD: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2000.
  • Field A, Casswell S. Marijuana use in New Zealand, 1990 and 1998. NZ Med J 2001;114:355-8.
  • Bates M. Interim Report on the toxicology of herbicides proposed for application to cannabis plants. Porirua: Kenepuru Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research, 1998.
  • Aquilino W. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys. Int J Addict 1992; 27:71-91.
  • MCAuliffe W, Geller S, La Brie R. Are telephone surveys suitable for studying substance abuse? Cost, administration, coverage and response rate issues. J Drug Issues 1998; 28:455-82.
  • Caspar R. Follow-up of non-respondents in 1990. In: Turner C, Lessler J, Gfroerer J, eds. Survey measurement of drug use: methodological studies. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
  • Gfroerer J, Hughes A. The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. Public Health Rep 1991;106: 384-94.
  • Wyilie A, Black S, Zhang J, Casswell S. Sample frame bias in telephone-based research in New Zealand. NZ Stat 1994;29:40-53.
  • Poulton RG, Brooke M, Moffitt TE, Stanton WR, Silva PA. Prevalence and correlates of cannabis use and dependence in young New Zealanders. NZ Med J 1997;110:68-70.
  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Cannabis use and dependence in a New Zealand birth cohort. NZ Med J 2000; 113:56-8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.