References
- de Angelis GG. Testing for drugs: advantages and disadvantages. Int J Addict 1972; 7: 365–85.
- Lui RH. Evaluation of commercial immunoassay kits for effective workplace drug testing. In: Lui RH, Goldberger BA, eds. Handbook of workplace drug testing. Washington: AACC Press, 1995.
- Taylor EH, Oertli EH, Wolfgand JW, Mueller E. Accuracy of five on-site immunoassay drugs-of abuse-testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 1999; 23: 119–24.
- Samyn N, Viaene B, Vandevenne L, Verstraete A. Inventory of state-of-the-art road side drug testing equipment. ROSITA Project, www.rosita.org, 1999.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion (SAMHSA). An evaluation of non-instrumented drug test devices. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Division of Workplace Programs, 1999.
- Smith ML, Shimomura ET, Summers J, Paul BD, Nichols D, Shippee R. Detection time and analytical performance of commercial urine opiate immunoassays following heroin administration. J Anal Toxicol 2000; 24: 522–9.
- Standards Australia. AS/NZ 4308:2001 Australian stan- dard: procedures for the collection, detection and quantitation of drugs of abuse in urine. Sydney: Standards Australia, 2001.
- Cody JT. Specimen adulteration in drug urinalysis. Forens Sci Rev 1990; 2: 63–75.
- Kidwell DA, Blank DL. Environmental exposure: the stumbling block of hair testing. In: Kintz P, ed. Drug testing in hair. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996: 17–68.
- Inoue T, Seta S, Goldberger B. Analysis of drugs unconventional samples. Forens Sci Rev 1992; 4: 89–107.
- Sachs H. Theoretical limits of the evaluation of drug concentrations in hair due to irregular hair growth. Forens Sci Int 1995; 70: 53–61.
- Reid RW, O’Connor FL, Deakin AG, Ivery DM, Crayton JW. Cocaine and metabolites in human graying hair: pigmentary relationship. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34: 685–90.
- Kidwell DA, Lee EH, DeLauder SF. Evidence for bias in hair testing and procedures to correct bias. Forens Sci Int 2000; 107: 39–61.
- Rohrich J, Zorntlein S, Po¨ tsch L, Skopp G, Becker J. Effect of the shampoo Ultra Clean on drug concentrations. Int J Legal Med 2000; 113: 102–6.
- Po¨ tsch L, Skopp G. Stability of opiates in hair fibers after exposure to cosmetic treatment. Forens Sci Int 1996; 81: 95–102.
- Skopp G, Po¨ tsch L, Moeller MR. On cosmetically treated hair-aspects and pitfalls of interpretation. Forens Sci Int 1997; 84: 43–52.
- Yegles M, Marson Y, Wennig R. Influence of bleaching on the stability of benzodiazepines in hair. Forens Sci Int 2000; 107: 87–92.
- Sachs H. Quality control by the Society of Hair Testing. Forens Sci Int 1997; 84: 145–50.
- Rouen D, Dolan K, Kimber J. A review of drug detection testing and an examination of urine, hair, saliva and sweat. NDARC technical report no. 120. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 2001.
- Uhl M. Determination of drugs in hair using GC/MS/MS. Forens Sci Int 1997; 84: 281–294.
- Sachs H, Kintz P. Testing for drugs in hair: Critical review of chromatographic procedures since 1992. J Chromatogr B 1998; 713: 147–61.
- United Nations International Drug Control Programme. Guidelines for testing drugs under international control in hair, sweat and saliva. New York: United Nations, 1998.
- Spiehler V. Hair analysis by immunological methods from the begining to 2000. Forens Sci Int 2000; 107: 249–59.
- Ho¨ ld KM, de Boer D, Zuidema J, Maes RA. Saliva as an analytical tool in toxicology. Int J Drug Testing 1996; 1: 1–29.
- Kidwell DA, Hlannd JC, Athanaselis S. Testing for drugs of abuse in saliva and sweat. J Chromatogr B 1998; 713: 111–35.
- Levisky JA, Bowerman DL, Jenkins WW, Karch SB. Drug deposition in adipose tissue and skin: evidence for an alternative source of positive sweat patch tests. Forens Sci Int 2000; 110: 35–46.