Ethical challenges and responses in harm reduction research: promoting applied communitarian ethics

References

• Erickson P G, Riley D M, Cheung Y W, O'Hare P A. Harm reduction: a new direction for drug policies and programs. University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1997
   Google Scholar
• Babor T F. Ethics matter: to authors, editors and those we serve. Addiction 2003; 98: 1–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hathaway A D. From harm reduction to human rights: bringing liberalism back into drug reform debates. Drug Alcohol Rev 2002; 21: 397–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang J, Fortson R. Supervised fixing rooms, supervised injectable maintenance clinics—understanding the difference [Commentary]. BMJ 2004; 328: 102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards G, Holder S, West R, Babor T F. Addiction journals: amazing happenings, landmark meeting, historic consensus, evolving process. Addiction 1997; 92: 1613–1616
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry C. Raising the profile of human research ethics in addictions research: a key role for addictions journals. Addiction 2002; 97: 229–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry C L, Hall W. An ethical framework for drug epidemiology: identifying the issues. Bull Narc 2002; 54: 131–142
   Google Scholar
• Fry C L, Hall W. Ethical challenges in drug epidemiology: issues, principles and guidelines. 2004, Global Assessment Programme on Drug Abuse Epidemiological Toolkit, Module VII. Global Assessment Programme on Drug Abuse, Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Available at: http://www.unodc.org/pdf/gap_toolkit_module7.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2004
   Google Scholar
• Maher L. Sexed work: gender, race and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. Appendix—on reflexivity, reciprocity and ethnographic research. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1997; 207–232
   Google Scholar
• Coupland H, Maher L. Clients or colleagues; participatory action research with young injecting drug users. Int J Drug Policy 2005; 16: 191–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry C L. Safer injecting facilities in Vancouver: considering issues beyond potential use. Can Med Assoc J 2003; 169: 777–778
   Google Scholar
• Veit F. Ethical issues in harm reduction for adolescent illicit drug users: the Adolescent Forensic Health Service approach. Drug Alcohol Rev 2000; 19: 457–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry C, Madden A, Brogan D, Loff B. Australian resources for ethical participatory processes in public health research. J Med Ethics, in press
   Google Scholar
• Australian Injecting & Illicit Drug Users League (AIVL). A national statement on ethical issues for research involving injecting/illicit drug users. AIVL, Canberra 2003, Available at: http://www.aivl.org.au/files/EthiicalIssuesforResearchInvolvingUsers.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2005
   Google Scholar
• Roche A M. Increasing primary care providers' willingness to intervene in alcohol and drug related problems: a review. Subst Abuse 1996; 17: 201–217
   Google Scholar
• Daly J, McDonald I. Ethics, responsibility and health research. Ethical intersections: health research, methods and researcher responsibility, J Daly. Allen & Unwin, St Leonards 1997; xiii–xxi
   Google Scholar
• White W L, Popovits R M. Critical incidents: ethical issues in the prevention and treatment of addiction, 2nd edn. Lighthouse Institute, Bloomington 2001
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction. Tertiary training review: review of alcohol and other drugs (AOD) tertiary training. NCETA, Adelaide 2004, http://www.nceta.flinders.edu.au/projects.htm#tertiary. Accessed 15 October 2004
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council National statement of ethical conduct in research involving humans. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra 1999, Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/issues/index.htm. Accessed 5 March 2003
   Google Scholar
• Strang J. Drug use and harm reduction: responding to the challenge. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: from faith to science, N Heather, A Wodak, E Nadelmann, P O'Hare. Whurr Publishers, London 1993; 3–20
   Google Scholar
• Keane H. Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. Int J Drug Policy 2003; 14: 227–232
   Google Scholar
• Ezard N. Public health, human rights and the harm reduction paradigm: from risk reduction to vulnerability reduction. Int J Drug Policy 2001; 12: 207–219
   Google Scholar
• Miller P G. A critical review of the harm minimization philosophy in Australia. Crit Pub Health 2001; 11: 167–178
   Google Scholar
• Hunt N. Public health or human rights: what comes first. Int J Drug Policy 2004; 15: 231–237
   Google Scholar
• Reinarman C. Public health and human rights: the virtues of ambiguity. Int J Drug Policy 2004; 15: 239–241
   Google Scholar
• Duff C. Drug use as a ‘practice of the self’: is there any place for an ‘ethics of moderation’ in contemporary drug policy. Int J Drug Policy 2004; 15: 385–393
   Google Scholar
• Hunt N. Public health or human rights. Int J Drug Policy 2005; 16: 5–7
   Google Scholar
• Callahan D, Jennings B. Ethics and public health: forging a strong relationship. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 169–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M J, Reich M R. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet 2002; 359: 1055–1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindall C. Does health promotion need a code of ethics. Health Promot Int 2002; 17: 201–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings B, Kahn J, Mastroianni A, Parker L S. Ethics and public health: model curriculum. Health Resources and Services Administration and the Association of Schools of Public Health, 2003, Available at: http://www.asph.org/document.cfm?page=782. Accessed 1 February 2005
   Google Scholar
• College on Problems of Drug Dependence. Human subject issues in drug abuse research. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995; 37: 167–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann J M, Gruskin S, Grodin M A, Annas G J. Health and human rights: a reader. Routledge, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Levin B W, Fleischman A R. Public health and bioethics: the benefits of collaboration. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 165–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry C L, Peerson A, Scully A M. Raising the profile of public health ethics in Australia: time for debate. Aust NZ J Public Health 2004; 28: 13–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeder S R. Ethics and public health. Intern Med J 2004; 34: 435–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guilleman M, Gillam L. Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments in research’. Qual Inquiry 2004; 10: 261–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry C. The place and practice of ethics in the Australian alcohol and other drug field. Presented at the Postgraduate Research Festival, School of Public Health, La Trobe University. MelbourneAustralia 26 November, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Ciccarone D, Bourgois P. Explaining the geographical variation of HIV among injection drug users in the United States. Subst Use Misuse 2003; 38: 2049–2063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers S, Arden K. Fit Habits: a brief intervention to reduce the risk of hepatitis C transmission. Poster presentation at 15th International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm. Melbourne. Australia 20–24 April, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Maher L. Don't leave us this way: ethnography in the age of AIDS. Int J Drug Policy 2002; 13: 311–325
   Google Scholar
• Farmer P. Pathologies of power: health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. University of California Press, Berkeley 2003
   Google Scholar
• Callahan D. Principlism and communitarianism. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 287–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell D. Communitarianism. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, E N Zalta. Stanford University. 2001, Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2001/entries/communitarianism/. Accessed 1 June 2004
   Google Scholar
• Consumers' Health Forum (CHF) and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Statement on consumer and community participation in health and medical research. NHMRC, Canberra 2001, Available at: http://www7.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/_files/r22.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2005
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Values and ethics—guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra 2003, Available at: http://www7.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/pdf/e52.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2004
   Google Scholar
• Fry C L. AIVL's National Statement on the ethics of research on illicit drug use: a reminder of the need for clear guidelines. Of Substance 2004; 2: 22–23
   Google Scholar
• The Angel Declaration. 2004, Available at: http://www.angeldeclaration.com. Accessed 8 December 2004
   Google Scholar
• Strauss R P, Sengupta S, Quinn S C, et al. The role of community advisory boards: Involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1938–1943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro K, Benatar S R. HIV prevention research and global inequality: steps towards improved standards of care. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 39–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer R, Fairchild A L. The genesis of public health ethics. Bioethics 2004; 18: 473–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes E. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics 2002; 16: 89–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe A M. Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 2004; 18: 120–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar