References
- Mattick R P, Ali R, White J M, O'Brien S, Wolk S, Danz C. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients. Addiction 2003; 98: 441–452
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD): report of results and recommendations. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2001
- Doran C M, Shanahan M, Mattick R P, Ali R, White J, Bell J. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 71: 295–302
- Caplehorn J RM. Reply to Mattick et al.: the need for independent data re-analyses [Letter]. Addiction 2003; 98: 1633–1634
- Jüni P, Altman D G, Egger M. Assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn., M Egger, G D Smith, D G Altman. BMJ Books, London 2001; 91
- Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191–1194
- Cox D R. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 1972; 34: 187–202
- Kleinbaum D G, Kupper L L, Muller K E, Nizam A. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA 1998
- Kleinbaum D G. Survival analysis: a self-learning text. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 1996
- Harford R J, Kleber H D. Comparative validity of random-interval and fixed-interval urinalysis schedules. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35: 356–359
- Caplehorn J. Comments on Ritter et al.'s report of a comparative trial of LAAM and methadone maintenance. Addiction 2004; 99: 509–510