Highest and best use in the valuation of mixed‐use development sites: a linear programming approach

References

• Appraisal Institute . 2001 . The Appraisal of Real Estate. , Chicago : Appraisal Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Carter , M. W. and Price , C. C. 2001 . Operations Research: A Practical Guide. , London : CRC Press .
   Google Scholar
• Capozza , D. and Hesley , R. 1990 . The Stochastic City, . Journal of Urban Economics , 28 : 187 – 203 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capozza , D. and Li , Y. 1994 . The Intensity & Timing of Investment: The Case of Land, . American Economic Review , 84 : 889 – 904 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantzig , G. B. and Thapa , M. N. 1997 . Linear Programming 1: Introduction. , New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Fanning , S. F. , Grissom , T. V. and Pearson , T. D. 1994 . Market Analysis for Valuation Appraisals. , Chicago : Appraisal Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Finch , J. H. 1996 . Highest and Best Use and the Special Purpose Property, . The Appraisal Journal , 64 (2) : 195 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Gau , G. W. and Kohlhepp , D. B. 1980 . The Financial Planning and Management of Real Estate Developments, . Financial Management , 9 (1) : 46 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geltner , D. 1989 . On the Use of the Financial Option Price Model to Value Land and Explain Vacant Urban Land, . AREUEA Journal , 17 : 142 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Geltner , D. and Miller , N. 2001 . Commercial Real Estate Analysis and Investments. , New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Geltner , D. , Riddiough , T. and Stojanovic , S. 1996 . Insights on the Effect of Land Use Choice: The Perpetual Option on the Best of Two Underlying Assets, . Journal of Urban Economics , 39 : 20 – 35 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graaskamp , J. A. 1970 . A Guide to Feasibility Analysis. , Chicago : Society of Real Estate Appraisers .
   Google Scholar
• Grenadier , S. R. 1995 . The Persistence of Real Estate Cycles, . Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economic , 10 : 95 – 119 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom , T. V. 1983 . The Semantics Debate: Highest and Best Use Versus Most Probable Use, . The Appraisal Journal , 51 (1) : 45 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , T. , Davies , K. and Shapiro , E. 2000 . Modern Methods of Valuation Of Land, Houses and Buildings. , London : Estates Gazette .
   Google Scholar
• Kent , B. , Bare , B. B. , Field , R. C. and Bradley , G. A. 1991 . Natural Resource Land Management Planning Using Large‐Scale Linear Programs: The USDA Forest Service Experience with FORPLAN, . Operations Research , 39 : 13 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennhoff , D. C. and Elhie , W. A. 1995 . Highest and Best User, . The Appraisal Journal , 63 (3) : 276 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Mahrotra , S. 1992 . On the Implementation of a Primal‐Dual Interior Point Method, . SIAM Journal on Optimization , 2 : 575 – 601 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchly , E. and Peiser , R. 1993 . Optimizing Land Use in Multiuse Projects, . Real Estate Review , 23 (2) : 79 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• North , L. W. 1981 . The Concept of Highest and Best Use. , Winnipeg, Manitoba : Appraisal Institute of Canada .
   Google Scholar
• Paris , Q. 1991 . An Economic Interpretation of Linear Programming. , Ames : Iowa State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Paxson , D. A. 2005 . Multiple State Property Options, . The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics , 30 (4) : 341 – 68 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiser , R. and Andrus , S. G. 1983 . Phasing of Income‐Producing Real Estate, . Interfaces , 13 (5) : 1 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rardin , R. L. 1998 . Optimization in Operation Research. , New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson , P. A. 1965 . Rational Theory of Warrant Pricing, . Industrial Management Review , 6 : 41 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarazen , P. 1995 . Highest and Best Use of a Vacant Parcel, . The Appraisal Journal , 63 (3) : 281 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz , A. and Brett , D. L. 2001 . Real Estate Market Analysis: A Case Study Approach. , WashingtonDC : ULI .
   Google Scholar
• Shu‐Cherng , F. and Puthenpura , S. 1993 . Linear Optimization and Extensions: Theory and Algorithms. , Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Titman , S. 1985 . Urban Land Prices Under Uncertainty, . American Economic Review , 75 : 505 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , T. 1991 . Real Estate Development as an Option, . Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics , 4 : 209 – 23 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , D. C. 1995 . Highest and Best Use: Appraisal Heuristics versus Economic Theory, . The Appraisal Journal , 63 (1) : 11 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , D. C. 1996 . Highest and Best Use: Preservation Use of Environmentally Significant Real Estate, . The Appraisal Journal , 64 (1) : 76 – 86 .
   Google Scholar
• Winokur , H. S. , Frick , J. B. and Bean , J. C. 1981 . The Affair Between the Land Developer and the Management Scientist, . Interfaces , 11 (5) : 50 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang , Y. 1995 . Solving Large‐Scale Linear Programs by Interior‐Point Methods Under the MATLAB Environment. Technical Report TR96‐01. , Baltimore, MD : Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland .
   Google Scholar