Considering the social impacts of artefacts in information systems design science research

References

• Aaen, I. (2008). Essence: Facilitating software innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 543–553.10.1057/ejis.2008.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Gader, A. H., & Kozar, K. A. (1995). The impact of computer alienation on information technology investment decisions: An exploratory cross-national analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 535–559.10.2307/249632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, S. (2015). The concept of ‘IT artifact’ has outlived its usefulness and should be retired now. Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 47–60.10.1111/isj.v25.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Kao, Y.-C. (2010). Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology – An empirical analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 153–167.10.1057/ejis.2010.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantleman, J., & Jones, A. (1984). Systems analysis methodologies: A research project. In T. M. A. Bemelmans (Ed.), Beyond productivity: Information systems development for organizational effectiveness (pp. 213–227). Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2009). Soft design science methodology. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model for user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 493–524.10.2307/25148693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. A. (2001). Social impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 311–321.10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00074-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1975). Approaches to the study of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 257–286.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M., & Grover, V. (2015). Me, my self, and I(T): Conceptualizing information technology identity and its implications. MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 931–957.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crothers, C. (1996). Social structure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J. (1997). A new social contract for research. Communications of the ACM, 40(2), 132–134.10.1145/253671.253755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R. G. (2007). Environmental studies (1). Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42.10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, T. G., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). A fitness-utility model for design science research. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 4(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135–146.10.1057/ejis.2011.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–356.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson, S., Rukanova, B., & Hrastinski, S. (2010). Resource dependencies in socio-technical information systems design research. Resource, 27, 777–802.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., & Newman, M. (1988). Information systems and user resistance: Theory and practice. The Computer Journal, 31(5), 398–408.10.1093/comjnl/31.5.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. (2003). The IS core-VII: Towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S., Jones, C., & Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4), 287–300.10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2014). A matter of life and death: Exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 895–925.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P. G. W. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), 24–33.10.1145/358527.358543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuechler, B., & Vaishnavi, V. (2008). On theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 489–504.10.1057/ejis.2008.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuechler, W., & Vaishnavi, V. (2012). A framework for theory development in design science research: Multiple perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(6), 395.10.17705/1jais
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., & Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 197–235.10.2307/30036529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. S. (2001). Editor’s comments: Research in information systems: What we haven’t learned. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z. (2006). Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: Self-identity theory perspective. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2–3), 60–75.10.1145/1161345
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. S., Thomas, M., & Baskerville, R. L. (2015). Going back to basics in design science: From the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Information Systems Journal, 25(1), 5–21.10.1111/isj.v25.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. (2001). SIA in review: Setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(4), 277–287.10.3152/147154601781766952
   Google Scholar
• López, J., & Scott, J. (2000). Social structure. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589–613.10.1057/ejis.2008.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–277.10.25300/MISQ
   Google Scholar
• March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrogiacomo, S., Missonier, S., & Bonazzi, R. (2014). Talk before it’s too late: Reconsidering the role of conversation in information systems project management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 47–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, E. H., & Yoos, C. J. (2010). Information about information: A taxonomy of views. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 329–A325.10.2307/20721430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, T. S., Head, M. M., Yuan, Y., & Chan, Y. E. (2011). A multilevel model for measuring fit between a firm’s competitive strategies and information systems capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 909–A910.10.2307/41409966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederman, F., & March, S. T. (2012). Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 3(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Niehaves, B., & Ortbach, K. (2016). The inner and the outer model in explanatory design theory: The case of designing electronic feedback systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(4), 303–316.10.1057/ejis.2016.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. (1990). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.10.1080/07421222.1990.11517898
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.10.1287/isre.7.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., & Vaezi, R. (2012). Design science research evaluation. Design science research in information systems. Advances in theory and practice (pp. 398–410). Las Vegas, NV: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., & Venable, J. (2008). Strategies for design science research evaluation. In European Conference on Information Systems 2008 Proceedings (pp. 1–12). Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, J. (2011). Scaling up: Assessing social impacts at the macro-scale. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 382–391.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumaker, J., Ward, K., Petter, S., & Riley, J. (2017, January). Mitigating the threat of lost knowledge within information technology departments. In T. Bui & R. Sprague (Eds.), HICSS 2017. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 5540–5549). Waikoloa, HI: ScholarSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, M. S., & Markus, M. L. (2013). Conceptualizing the sociotechnical (ST) artifact. Systems, Signs & Actions, 7(1), 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg, R., Vanclay, F., & Van Schooten, M. (2001). Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(1), 19–28.10.3152/147154601781767186
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., & Yoshikawa, H. (1990). Modeling design process. AI Magazine, 11(4), 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C.-H., Sutanto, J., Phang, C. W., & Gasimov, A. (2014). Using personal communication technologies for commercial communications: A cross-country investigation of email and SMS. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 307–327.10.1287/isre.2014.0519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truex, D. P., Baskerville, R., & Klein, H. (1999). Growing systems in emergent organizations. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 117–123.10.1145/310930.310984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsichritzis, D. (1998). The dynamics of innovation. In P. J. Denning & R. M. Metcalfe (Eds.), Beyond calculation: The next fifty years of computing (pp. 259–265). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 183–211.10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6
   Google Scholar
• Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). Parsons, Luhmann and the theorem of double contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2(1), 77–92.10.1177/1468795X02002001684
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89.10.1057/ejis.2014.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Krogh, G., & Haefliger, S. (2010). Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(4), 232–241.10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., Chatterjee, S., & Rossi, M. (2008). Design of emerging digital services: A taxonomy. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 505–517.10.1057/ejis.2008.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. (2008). Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 470–475.10.1057/ejis.2008.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar