Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research

References

• Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). The simple economics of AI. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, R. (1998). The craft of an inquiry: Theories, methods, evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allmer, T., Sevignani, S., & Prodnik, J. A. ((2015)). Mapping approaches to user participation and digital labour: A critical perspective. In E. Fisher & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Reconsidering value and labour in the digital age (pp. 153–171). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1934). Nicomachean ethics. ( Translated by Rackham H. William). London: Heinemann Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S., & Ausch, R. (2000). A critique of methodological reason. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 699–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenier, M. J., & Thomas, C. (2015). Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 20(1), 61–98.
   Google Scholar
• Avital, M., Mathiassen, L., & Schultze, U. (2017). Alternative genres in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(3), 240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. (2011). Individual information systems as a research arena. European Journal Information Systems, 20(3), 251–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139‑68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2014). Amazon mechanical turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon-Davies, P. (2018). What’s in a face? Making sense of tangible information systems in terms of Peircean semiotics. European Journal of Information Systems. 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, M. (1893/1993). L’action. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R., & Lyytinen, K. (2017). The limits to language in doing systems design. European Journal Information Systems, 26(3), 248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, D. (2005). Utilitarianism, game theory and the social contract. Macalester Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), article 7. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Cekmanovic, D. (2010). Doing critical information systems research – Arguments for a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 440–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheikh-Ammar, M. (2018). The IT artifact and its spirit: A nexus of human values, affordances, symbolic, expressions, and it features. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M., Davidson, E., & Winter, J. (2018). Philosophical foundations for informing the future(S) through IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, J. (2015). Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. In E. N. Zalta. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. (1998). Crisis and foundation: An inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 7(1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• De Montaigne, M. (1580/2003). The complete essays ( Trans. M. A. Screech). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. ( Trans H Tomlinson and B Habberjam). London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diderot, D. (1785/1999). Jaques the fatalist (and his master). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. F. R., Murphy, N., & O’Connor, T. (Eds.). (2009). Dounward causation and the neurobiology of free will. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elmes, M. B., Strong, D. M., & Volkoff, O. (2005). Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations. Information and Organization, 15(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, D. (1997). A principal exposition of Jean-Louis Le Moigne’s systemic theory. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 4, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Farajallah, M., Le Goff-Pronost, M., Penard, T., & Suire, R. (2015). Quoi de neuf docteur? Une étude économétrique sur la recherche en ligne d’informations médicales par les patients. Journal de Gestion et d’Economie Médicales, 33, 231–251.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, L. (2014). Sagesses d'hier et d'aujourd'hui. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1998). Against method (3rd ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1999). Conquest of abundance: A tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. (Ed. Bert Terpstra). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? Triplec: Communication, capitalism & critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 11(2), 237–293.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreth, M., & Shor, M. (2010). The impact of malicious agents on the enterprise software industry. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomoni, G., & Sardas, J. P. (2014). Why innovation requires new foundations to design workable and manageable identities of systems. In F. Rowe & D. Te’eni (Eds.), Innovation and IT in an international context: R&D, strategy and operations (pp. 85–114). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, R. N. (2018, March 15). Truth isn’t the problem – We are, Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, M. (2018). Towards a manifesto for a critical digital humanities: Critiquing the extractive capitalism of digital society. Palgrave Communications, 4, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 271–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action (Mccarthy, T, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2010). Towards speculative realism: Essays and lectures. Ropley: John Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, D. J. (1991). Polemical parables in Matthew 24–25. Union Seminary Quarterly Review, 44(3–4), 287–298.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, N. R. (2014). Paradigm lost … paradigm gained: A hermeneutical rejoinder to Banville and Landry’s ‘can the field of MIS be disciplined?’ European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 600–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, N. R., Mingers, J., & Stahl, B. (2018). Philosophy and information systems: Where are we and where should we go?. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1954/1997). The question concerning technology ( Translation by William Lovitt). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. K., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., Lyytinen, K., & Myers, M. (2011). Special issue on the kleinian approach to information system research – foreword. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 418–421. doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland, J. A. (1992). Philosophy as dialogue. Reason Papers, 17, 113–134.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L., & Brigham, M. (2007). Reconsidering community and the stranger in the age of virtuality. Society and Business Review, 2(2), 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. (2016). Kant’s moral philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
   Google Scholar
• Juarrero, A. (2002). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, P. J. (1996). Nietzschean genealogy and hegelian history in the genealogy of morals. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1785/2011). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals: A German-English edition. (Ed. and Tr. Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kappelman, L., Johnson, V., Torres, R., Maurer, R., & Mclean, E. (under review). A study of information systems: Issues, practices, and leadership in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. (1981). Design ideals and their critical reconstruction. Proceedings TIMS, 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Rowe, F. (2008). Marshaling the professional experience of doctoral students: A contribution to the practical relevance debate. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 675–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononenko, L. (2001). Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 23(1), 89–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. (2018). Against nature: The metaphysics of information systems. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• La Mettrie, J. (1753). L'homme-machine. In Oeuvres philosophiques de M. de La Mettrie (Vol. 2). Amsterdam; See also La Mettrie: Machine man and other writings (2003). Thomson (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langefors, B. (1980). Infological models and information user views. Information Systems, 5(1), 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Bertin, E. (2018). From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2004). Thinking about social theory and philosophy for information systems. In J. Mingers & L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 1–26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (1999). Open code and open societies: Values of internet governance. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 74, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Libet, B. (2005). Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loekmer, L. (1966, July–December). Leibniz’s conception of philosophical method. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Bd 20 H ¾. Zum Gendanken an den 250 Todestag von Gottfried Wilhem Leibniz, 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, B., Dinev, T., & Willison, R. (2017). Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (IS) artefact: Proposing a bold research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(6), 546–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. I., & Rowe, F. (in press). Is IT changing the world? Conceptions of causality for IS research. MIS Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (1973, translation of). Plato’s theaetetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna, M., & Coates, D. J. (2015). Compatibilism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved June 2, 2015, from https://www.sabbaticalhomes.com/
   Google Scholar
• Meillassoux, Q. (2010). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7, 41-50.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (2014). Systems thinking, critical realism and philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Walsham, G. (2010). Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 833–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (eds.) (2004). Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Monod, E. (2003). A copernican revolution in IS: Using Kant’s critique of pure reason for describing epistemological trends in IS. 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa.
   Google Scholar
• Monod, J. (1972). Chance and necessity. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, G. D., Galetta, D. F., & Dunn, D. K. (2017). Which phish get caught? An exploratory study of individuals′ susceptibility to phishing. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(6), 564–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M., & Klein, H. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O., Henriksen, H. Z., & Hardt, D. (under review). Public management challenges of the digital risk society: A critically analysis of the public debate on implementation of the Danish nemid.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O., & Klein, S. (2018). Phronesis, argumentation and puzzle solving in IS research: Illustrating an approach to phronetic IS research practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzche, F. (1910). The complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche: The will to power (Vol. 15). London: TN Foulis.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. W. (2000). Genres in dialogue: Plato and the construct of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberländer, A. M., Röglinger, M., Rosemann, M., & Kees, A. (2017). Conceptualizing business-to-thing interactions – A sociomaterial perspective on the internet of things. European Journal of Information Systems. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2017.1387714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeier, K. (1983). Wittgenstein on language and artificial intelligence: The chinese-room thought experiment revisited. Synthese, 56(1983), 339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Olbrich, S., Frank, U., Gregor, S., Niederman, F., & Rowe, F. (2017). On the merits and limits of replication and negation for IS research. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 3, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. (2018). Design science research genres: Introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, J., Monod, E., Fang, B., & Deng, S. (2018). Theories of social media: Philosophical foundations. Engineering, 4, 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabelais, F. (1964). Pantagruel. (1542), éd. Gallimard). Paris: chap. VIII, «Comment Pantagruel, estant à Paris, receult letres de son père Gargantua, et la copie d’icelles».
   Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Myers, M. D. (2013). Information technology offshoring in India: A postcolonial perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbin, A. (2011). Embracing technology and the challenges of complexity, triplec: Communication, capitalism & critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 9(1), 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, D., Hermosillo, J., & Lara, B. (2012). Meaning in artificial agents: The symbol grounding problem revisited. Minds and Machines, 22(1), 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. (1996). On voluntary servitude: False consciousness and the theory of ideology. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2006). Are decision support systems getting people to conform? The impact of work organisation and segmentation on user behaviour in a French bank. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2009). Diversité des approches critiques en Systèmes d’Information: de la sociologie de la domination à l’éthique de l’émancipation. Economies et Sociétés, 43(12), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2010). Valuing worldwide diversity in a European spirit: Being more critical and open. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2011). Towards a greater diversity in writing styles, argumentative strategies and genre of manuscripts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 491–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F., & Limayem, M. (1999). Richesse des services téléphoniques et exclusion dans un service public. Politiques et Management Public, 16(2), 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U. (2014). Performing embodied identity in virtual worlds. European Journal of Information System, (23), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world (Vol. 1). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. (2011). An aristotelian view of knowledge for knowledge management. In D. Te’eni & D. Schwarz (Eds.), Encyclopedia of knowledge management (2nd ed., pp. 39–48). Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. (2004). Information, ethics and computers: The problem of autonomous moral agents. Minds and Machines, 14(1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(3), 207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. (2014). Interpretive accounts and fairy tales: A critical polemic against the empiricist bias in interpretive IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker, M. (2018) How philosophy was squeezed out of the PhD. Nature, 556, 31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The Art of political decision making (Rev ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., & Davison, R. (in press). Research in information systems: Intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te’eni, D., Rowe, F., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Lee, J. S. (2015). Publishing and getting published in EJIS: Marshaling contributions for a diversity of genres. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(6), 559–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (2009). ‘How reason lost its balance’ in Return to reason (pp. 14–28). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tow, W., Dell, P., & Venable, J. (2010). Understanding information disclosure behaviour in Australian Facebook users. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology choice: Critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(4), 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. (2014). Practical Reason. In E. N. Zalta. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/practical-reason/
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2010). Empiricism in interpretive IS research: A response to Stahl. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, A. K. (Ed., Translator). (1996). Plato’s parmenides. Newburyport: Focus Pub R Pullins & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: A study in cosmology. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Wynn, D. (2018). A critical realist script for creative theorising in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an informatiosn civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar