Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital

References

• Beverungen, D. (2014). Exploring the interplay of the design and emergence of business processes as organizational routines. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1998). General introduction. In M. S. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. ix–xxiv). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Kensing, F. (2013). Special issue on information infrastructures for healthcare: The global and local relation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), 281–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygstad, B. (2017). Generative innovation: A comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. Journal of Information Technology, 32(2), 180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygstad, B., & Hanseth, O. (2018). Transforming digital infrastructures through Platformization. Proceedings of European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS), Portsmouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bygstad, B., & Iden, J. (2017). A governance model for managing lightweight IT. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 384–393). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. Associates. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C., & Hanseth, O. (2000). Introduction. In Ciborra and associates, From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures (pp. 1–11). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comella-Dorda, S., Lohiya, S., & Speksnijder, G. (2016). An operating model for company-wide agile development. McKinsey Digital. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/an-operating-model-for-company-wide-agile-development
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, P. (2018). Introduction – Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, J., & Huijsman, R. (2011). Supply chain management in health services: An overview. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics,tensions, and design. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/49353
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E., & Røed, K. (2013). Integration as interdependent workaround. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(82), 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. J. (2018). IT Consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1225–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A., (2017). «The transformative role of bimodal IT in an era of digital business”. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5460–5469), Waikoloa Beach, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. (2015). What is business process management? In J. V. Brocke & M. Rossemann (Eds.), Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods and information systems (2nd ed., pp. 3–16). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporations. NYC: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(25), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, P. (2010). The scope and evolution of business process management. In J. Vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on business process management. Introduction, methods and information systems (pp. 37–81). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2019, Feb). Configuring information systems and work practices for each other: What competences are needed locally? International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 122, 242–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islind, A. S., Lindroth, T., Snis, U. L., & Sørensen, C. (2016). Co-creation and fine-tuning of boundary resources in small-scale platformization. In U. Lundh Snis (Ed.), Nordic contributions in IS research. SCIS 2016. Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 259, pp. 149–162). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemsley, S. (2015). Emerging technologies in BPM. In J. V. Brocke & T. Schmiedel (Eds.), BPM – Driving innovation in a digital world (pp. 3–15). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. (2015). Robotic process automation at telefonica O2. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, E. (1998). Scaling information infrastructure: The case of next-generation IP in the internet. The Information Society, 14(3), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øvrelid, E., Sanner, T. A., & Siebenhertz, A. (2018). Creating coordinative paths from admission to discharge: The role of lightweight IT in hospital digital process innovation. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Parnas, D. L. (1972). On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM, 15(12), 1053–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Liu, P., Kremser, W., & Hærem, T. (2019). The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. MIS Quarterly (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Recker, J. (2014). Suggestions for the next wave of bpm research: Strengthening the theoretical core and exploring the protective belt. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 15(2), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Recker, J., & Mendling, J. (2016). The state-of-the-art of business process management research as published in the bpm conference: Recommendations for progressing the field. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedel, T., & Brocke, J. V. (2015). Business process management: Potentials and challenges of driving innovation. In J. V. Brocke & T. Schmiedel (Eds.), BPM – Driving innovation in a digital world (pp. 3–15). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., Müller-Wienbergen, F., & Becker, J. (2010). The concept of creativity in the information systems discipline: Past, present, and prospects. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(1), 217–242.
   Google Scholar
• Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, O. D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2013). Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Torkilsheyggi, A., & Hertzum, M. (2017). Incomplete by design: A study of a design-in-use approach to systems implementation. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (2015). Business process management. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 7, January, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Weggelaar-Jansen, A. M., & van Wijngaarden, J. (2018). Transferring skills in quality collaboratives focused on improving patient logistics. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2013). Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar