Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation

References

• Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arazy, O., Lindberg, A., Rezaei, M., & Samorani, M. (2020). The evolutionary trajectories of peer-produced artifacts: Group composition, the trajectories’ exploration, and the quality of artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 44(forthcoming). Retrieved from https://misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/Abstracts/15379_RA_ArazyLindbergAbstract.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C. (2019). Contextual explanation: Alternative approaches and persistent challenges. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 977–1006. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avital, M., & Te’Eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 19(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for is research. MIS Quarterly, 44(forthcoming). Retrieved from https://misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/Abstracts/14418_IO_BaskervilleMyersAbstract.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bass, L., Weber, I., & Zhu, L. (2015). Devops: A software architect’s perspective. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbunan-Fich, R. (2019). An affordance lens for wearable information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, H., & Deken, F. (2020). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization, 18(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018824838
   Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Seidel, S., & Safadi, H. (2019). Data-driven computationally-intensive theory development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electronic Markets, 29(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0270-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-d representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, R. P. J. C., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2009). Context aware trace clustering: Towards improving process mining results [Paper presented]. SIAM international conference on data mining sparks, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, G., Dengler, F., Jennings, B., Khalaf, R., Nurcan, S., Prilla, M., … Silva, R. (2011). Key challenges for enabling agile bpm with social software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 23(4), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.523
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bygstad, B., & Øvrelid, E. (2020). Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1728201
   Google Scholar
• Casati, F. (1999). A discussion on approaches to handling exceptions in workflows. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 20(3), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/605610.605611
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, W. A., & Newell, S. (2016). Mindful revolution or mindless trend? Examining agile development as a management fashion. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, K., & Seidl, D. (2018). Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of business process management (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., & Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichman, R. G., Dos Santos, B. L., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. (2012). The road to the philosophy of information. In H. Demir (Ed.), Luciano floridi’s philosophy of technology (pp. 245–271). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. (2014). On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.875018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014). Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.3.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, J. P., & Centefelli, R. T. (2020). Constant checking is not addiction: A grounded theory of it-mediated state-tracking. MIS Quarterly, (forthcoming). Retrieved from https://misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/Abstracts/15865_RA_GerlachCenfetelliAbstract.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. T., & Pentland, B. T. (2019). From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1901–1929. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisold, T., Wurm, B., Mendling, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2020). Using process mining to support theorizing about change in organizations [Paper presented]. 53rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, C., Rinderle-Ma, S., Reichert, M., Van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Recker, J. (2008). Using process mining to learn from process changes in evolutionary systems. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPIM.2008.019348
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104–112. Retrived from https://hbr.org/1990/07/reengineering-work-dont-automate-obliterate
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Harpercollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Bridging old worlds and building new ones: Toward a microsociology of creativity. In L. L. Thompson & H.-S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 199–216). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2017). Process as the becoming of temporal trajectory. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The sage handbook of process organization studies (pp. 601–606). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R. (1986). Office automation: A social and organizational perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, R., & Motahari-Nezhad, H. R. (2016). Rethinking bpm in a cognitive world: Transforming how we learn and perform business processes [Paper presented]. 14th International conference on business process management, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., & Rosemann, M. (2009). Business process modeling: Perceived benefits. In S. Castano, U. Dayal, & A. H. F. Laender (Eds.), Conceptual modeling - er 2009 (pp. 458–471). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., & Green, P. (2009). Process modeling: Current issues and future challenges. In P. van Eck, J. Gordijn, & R. Wieringa (Eds.), Advanced information systems engineering - caise 2009 (Vol. 5565, pp. 501–514). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jans, M., van der Werf, J. M., Lybaert, N., & Vanhoof, K. (2011). A business process mining application for internal transaction fraud mitigation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 13351–13359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlborn, T., Müller, O., Poeppelbuss, J., & Röglinger, M. (2014). Interview with michael rosemann on ambidextrous business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 20(4), 634–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2014-0012
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, H., Nickerson, J. V., & Sabnis, G. (2017). Knowledge reuse for customization: Metamodels in an open design community for 3d printing. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.17a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity, M., & Wilcocks, L. (2017). A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11633.003.0015
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.). (2017). The sage handbook of process organization studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leymann, F., & Roller, D. (2000). Production workflow: Concepts and techniques. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2011). Inter-organizational information systems adoption - a configuration analysis approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2016). Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, C., & O’Donohoe, S. (2019). Homo prostheticus? Intercorporeality and the emerging adult-smartphone assemblage. Information Technology & People, 32(3), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2017-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendling, J., Decker, G., Hull, R., Reijers, H. A., & Weber, I. (2018a). How do machine learning, robotic process automation, and blockchains affect the human factor in business process management? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43(19), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendling, J., Weber, I., Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Vom Brocke, J., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., … Zhu, L. (2018b). Blockchains for business process management - challenges and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kohlborn, T., & Kummer, T.-F. (2016). A framework for the study of positive deviance in organizations. Deviant Behavior, 37(11), 1288–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1174519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740618
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F. M., & Suriadi, S. (2014). Mining business process deviance: A quest for accuracy. In R. Meersman, H. Panetto, T. S. Dillon, M. Missikoff, L. Liu, O. Pastor, A. Cuzzocrea, & T. Sellis (Eds.), On the move to meaningful internet systems: Otm 2014 (Vol. 8841, pp. 436–445). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OMG. (2016). Case model management and notation (cmmn) specification version 1.1. Object Management Group. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from https://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.1/
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Liu, P., Kremser, W., & Hærem, T. (2020a). The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Recker, J., Ryan Wolf, J., & Wyner, G. (2020b). Bringing context inside process research with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2010). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poll, R., Polyvyanyy, A., Rosemann, M., Röglinger, M., & Rupprecht, L. (2018). Process forecasting: Towards proactive business process management [Paper presented]. 16th International conference on business process management, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, M., & Dadam, P. (1998). Adeptflex – Supporting dynamic changes of workflows without loosing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008604709862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, A., Guggenmos, F., Locki, J., Fridgen, G., & Urbach, N. (2019). Building a blockchain application that complies with the eu general data protection regulation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann, M., Recker, J., & Flender, C. (2008). Contextualization of business processes. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPIM.2008.019347
   Google Scholar
• Satyal, S., Weber, I., Paik, H.-Y., Di Ciccio, C., & Mendling, J. (2019). Business process improvement with the ab-bpm methodology. Information Systems, 84, 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedel, T., & Vom Brocke, J. (2015). Business process management: Potentials and challenges of driving innovation. In J. Vom Brocke & T. Schmiedel (Eds.), Bpm - driving innovation in a digital world (pp. 3–15). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. G., Lindermann, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, S., Janiesch, C., Venugopal, S., Weber, I., & Hoenisch, P. (2015). Elastic business process management: State of the art and open challenges for bpm in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 46, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, B. (2009). Bpmn method and style: A levels-based methodology for bpm process modeling and improvement using bpmn 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management - the third wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E. B. (2019). Technology as routine capability. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/14653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, K. D. (2012). Social bpm: Work, planning and collaboration under the impact of social technology. Future Strategies Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B. R., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2005). Business alignment: Using process mining as a tool for delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Engineering, 10(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0001-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process mining: Discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013). Business process management: A comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weijters, A. J. M. M., & Maruster, L. (2004). Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(9), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2004.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Weske, M. (2005). Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 53(2), 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., & Mendling, J. (Eds.). (2018). Business process management cases: Digital innovation and business transformation in practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods and information systems (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., & Viaene, S. (2014). Ten principles of good business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 20(4), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2013-0074
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2016). Identifying viable “need–solution pairs”: Problemsolving without problem formulation. Organization Science, 27(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werder, K., Seidel, S., Recker, J., Berente, N., Kundert-Gibbs, J., Abboud, N., & Benzeghadi, Y. (2020). Data-driven, data-informed, data-augmented: How ubisoft’s ghost recon wildlands live unit uses data for continuous product innovation. California Management Review, 63(3), forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620915290
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Publication Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. S. (2014). Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Information and Organization, 24(4), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (2016). Planet of the things. Computer Fraud & Security, 2016(3), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(16)30027-6
   Google Scholar