References
- Allen, P. M., & Varga, L. (2006). A co-evolutionary complex systems perspective on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000075
- Amarilli, F., van Vliet, M., & Van den Hooff, B. (2017). An explanatory study on the co-evolutionary mechanisms of business it alignment. The 38th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–21).
- Amarilli, F., Van Vliet, M., & Van den Hooff, B. (2016). Business IT alignment through the lens of complexity science. The 37th international conference on information systems (pp. 1–16).
- Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P., & Wilson, D. (2004). Using and validating the strategic alignment model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(3), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2004.08.002
- Baker, J., & Singh, H. (2015). The roots of misalignment: Insights from a system dynamics perspective. The JAIS theory development workshop Fort Worth (pp. 1–37).
- Benbya, H., & McKelvey, B. (2006a). Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: A multi-level approach. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000080
- Benbya, H., McKelvey, B., & Jacucci, E. (2006b). Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Information Technology & People, 19(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610649952
- Besson, P., & Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001
- Bordia, P., Bernd, E. I., & David, A. (2006). Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500417784
- Bygstad, B., Munkvold, B. E., & Volkoff, O. (2016). Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: A framework for critical realist data analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.13
- Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing Dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602235001
- Carvalho, R., & Sousa, P. (2008). Business and Information Systems MisAlignment Model (BISMAM): An holistic model leveraged on misalignment and medical sciences approaches. Proceedings of BUSITAL, 8, 105. http://dx.doi.org/
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Kay, R. (2001). IS-organization coevolution: The future of information systems. The 22th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 41–51).
- Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000109
- Chen, H. M., Kazman, R., & Garg, A. (2005). BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 57(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2004.10.002
- Ciborra, C. U., & Patriota, G. (1998). Groupware and teamwork in R&D: Limits to learning and innovation. R&D Management, 28(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00080
- Crooks, A., Heppenstall, A. J., & Malleson, N. (2017). Agent-Based modeling. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09704-9
- De, H. S., & Wim, V. G. (2015). Enterprise governance of information technology. Achieving Alignment and Value, Featuring COBIT 5.
- El Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research commentary -seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0326
- Fioretti, G. (2013). Agent-based simulation models in organization science. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470006
- Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
- George, G., Osinga, E., Lavie, D., & Scott, B. A. (2016). Big data and data science methods for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1493–1507. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4005
- Gerow, J. E., Thatcher, J. B., & Grover, V. (2015). Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: An investigation of the constructs and their measurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.6
- Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.631
- Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
- Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472
- Hevner, A. R., Salvatore, T. M., Jinsoo, P., Sudha R. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
- Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Addison-Wesley.
- Joseph, K., Morgan, G., Martin, M., & Carley, K. (2014). On the coevolution of stereotype, culture, and social relationships: An agent-based model. Social Science Computer Review, 32(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313511388
- Kandjani, H., Tavana, M., Bernus, P., & Nielsen, S. (2014). Co-Evolution Path Model (CePM): Sustaining enterprises as complex systems on the edge of Chaos. Cybernetics and Systems, 45(7), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2014.945315
- Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Selforganization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press.
- Kearns, G. S., & Albert, L. L. (2003). A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 34(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02289
- Lewin, A. Y., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Coevolution of strategy and new organizational forms. Special Issue of Organization Science, 10(5), 519–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
- Liang, H., Wang, N., Xue, Y., & Ge, S. (2017). Unraveling the alignment paradox: How does business—IT alignment shape organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 28(4), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0711
- Luftman, J. (2004). Assessing business-IT allignment maturity. Strategies for Information Technology Governance, 99–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/9781878289872.ch006
- Luftman, J., Lyytinen, K., & Ben Zvi, T. (2017). Enhancing the measurement of information technology business alignment and its influence on company performance. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.23
- McKelvey, B. (1999). Avoiding complexity catastrophe in coevolutionary pockets. Organization Science, 10(3), 294–321. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.294
- Merali, Y., Papadopoulos, T., & Nadkarni, T. (2012). Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.002
- Mitleton-Kelly, E., & Papaefthimiou, M. C. (2000). Co-evolution and an enabling infrastructure: A solution to legacy? Systems Engineering for Business Process Change, 164–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_14
- Nan, N., & Tanriverdi, H. (2017). Unifying the role of IT in hyperturbulence and competitive advantage via a multilevel perspective of IS strategy. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.3.12
- Nassim, B., & Robert, F. (2010). IS Alignment improved with co-evolutionary principles: An Open Source approach. The 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10).
- Onik, M. F. A., Fielt, E., & Gable, G. G. (2017). Towards a complex adaptive systems roadmap for information systems research. Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (pp. 106).
- Őri, D. (2014). Misalignment symptom analysis based on enterprise architecture model assessment. IADIS International Journal on Computer Science & Information Systems, 9(2), 146–158. Retrieved from www.iadisportal.org/ijcsis/papers/2014170210.pdf
- Page, S. E. (2009). Understanding Complexity. Teaching Company.
- Peppard, J., & Breu, K. (2003). Beyond alignment: A coevolutionary view of the information systems strategy process. The 24th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 61–69).
- Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250980
- Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., & Goles, T. (2001). The dynamics of alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science, 12(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.179.10113
- Schlosser, F., Wagner, H. T., & Coltman, T. (2012). Reconsidering the dimensions of business-IT alignment. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 5053–5061). IEEE.
- Simpson, J. R., Wilkin, C. L., Campbell, J., Keating, B. W., & Moore, S. (2016). Iterate wildly: Is user-centred design and prototyping the key to strategic alignment? The 24th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–12).
- Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044052
- Tanriverdi, H., & Lim, S. Y. (2017). How to survive and thrive in complex, hypercompetitive, and disruptive ecosystems? The roles of IS-enabled capabilities. The 38th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–21).
- Tanriverdi, H., Rai, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2010). Research commentary—reframing the dominant quests of information systems strategy research for complex adaptive business systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0317
- Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford University.
- Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy Management Perspective, 24(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
- Tivnan, B. F. (2005). Coevolutionary dynamics and agent-based models in organization science. Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation conference (pp. 1013–1021).
- Vessey, I., & Ward, K. (2013). The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: The case for IS adaptivity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(6), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00336
- Vidgen, R., & Wang, X. (2006). From business process management to business process ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000076
- Wagner, H. T. (2014). Evolvement of business-IT alignment over time: A situated change perspective. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4366–4375). IEEE.
- Wagner, H. T., & Weitzel, T. (2012). How to achieve operational business-IT Alignment: Insights from a global aerospace firm. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 25–36. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol11/iss1/5
- Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Jr, Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
- Zhang, M., Chen, H., & Lyytinen, K. (2019a). Principles of Organizational Co-evolution of Business and IT A Complexity Perspective. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2019).
- Zhang, M., Chen, H., Lyytinen, K., & Li, X. (2019b). A co-evolutionary perspective on business and IT alignment: A review and research agenda. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-52).
- Zwietering, M., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M., & Van, T. (1990). Modeling of bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(6), 1875–1881. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.56.6.1875-1881.1990