Design principles for learning analytics information systems in higher education

References

• Argyris, C. (1970). Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012) Course signals: using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge pp 267–270, ACM, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, A. (2004). Service-oriented modeling and architecture: How to identify, specify, and realize services for your SOA. In IBM developer works (pp. 1–15), IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice (pp. 61–75). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bakharia, A., Corrin, L., De Barba, P., Kennedy, G., Gašević, D., Mulder, R., Williams, D., Dawson, S., & Lockyer, L. (2016) A conceptual framework linking learning design with learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge pp 329–338, ACM Press, New York, USA. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2883851.2883944.
   Google Scholar
• Basili, V. R., Boehm, B. W., Rombach, H. D., & Zelkowitz, M. V. (2005). Foundations of empirical software engineering. (B. Boehm, H. D. Rombach, & M. V. Zelkowitz, Eds). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., Rossi, M., Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2018). Design science research contributions: finding a balance between artifact and theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 358–376. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss5/3/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2010). Explanatory design theory. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(5), 271–282. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-010-0118-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. A., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Beynon-Davies, P. (1998). Information systems development: An Introduction to Information Systems Engineering. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bodily, R., Ikahihifo, T. K., Mackley, B., & Graham, C. R. (2018). The design, development, and implementation of student-facing learning analytics dashboards. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 572–598. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12528-018-9186-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, N., Groeneveld, C., Van Bruggen, J., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). The use of recorded lectures in education and the impact on lecture attendance and exam performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 906–917. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2001). Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 1. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3250956?origin=crossref
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brocke Vom, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020). Special issue editorial – Accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: A journey through time and space. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 520–544. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol21/iss3/9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2020). Seeing students at scale: How faculty in large lecture courses act upon learning analytics dashboard data. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1698540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 13(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/B8M6T51V83732308.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., & Purao, S. (2016). Making use of design principles. J. Parsons, T. Tuunanen, B. Venable, J. Donnellan, M. Helfert, & J. Kenneally. Eds., Tackling Society’s Grand Challenges with Design Science. DESRIST 2016 37–51. Springer, Cham. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_3
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, L., Seidel, S., & Gregor, S. (2015) Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences pp 4039–4048, IEEE, HI, USA. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7070304/.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., Elbanna, A., & Sarker, S. (2017) The information systems artifact: a conceptualization based on general systems theory. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318–331. Available at: http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051815
   Google Scholar
• Chatti, M. A., Lukarov, V., Thüs, H., Muslim, A., Yousef, A. M. F., Wahid, U., Greven, C., Chakrabarti, A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Learning analytics: challenges and future research directions. Eleed, Iss. 10. Available at https://eleed.campussource.de/archive/10/4035
   Google Scholar
• Chaurasia, S. S., Kodwani, D., Lachhwani, H., & Ketkar, M. A. (2018). Big data academic and learning analytics. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1099–1117. Available at https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695. Available at: http://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562517.2013.827653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., & Bichsel, J. (2014) The current ecosystem of learning management systems in higher education: Student, faculty, and IT perspectives. Educause Review. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/ecar.2014
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. (2015). Big data and analytics in higher education: opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 904–920. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12230/full
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. (2017). Big Data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113. Available at https://doi.org/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjet.12595
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. M. (1992). Operational prototyping: a new development approach. IEEE Software, 9(5), 70–78. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/156899/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. M., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., & Moreno, A. M. (2006) Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review. In 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’06) pp 179–188, IEEE, MN, USA. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1704061/.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2014) Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, IN, USA. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2567585 .
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. Available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz-Uhler, B., & Hurn, J. E. (2013). Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: a faculty perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 17–26. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1032978
   Google Scholar
• Duval, E. (2011) Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge pp 9–17, ACM, Banff, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58–76. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.15.3.58.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, A., & Morris, A. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink, R. (2014). Operational prototyping a tool for delivering value. Healthcare Financial Management : Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 68(6), 116–123. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24968635
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gašević, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavriushenko, M., Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2017) Towards evidence-based academic advising using learning analytics. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education pp 44–65, Springer, Cham, Porto, Portugal. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P. J., & Katz, R. N. (2005). Academic analytics: the uses of management information and technology in higher education. Educause, 8(1), 1–12. Available at https://library.educause.edu/resources/2005/12/academic-analytics-the-uses-of-management-information-and-technology-in-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–355. Available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss5/19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 42–57. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.15.3.42.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, W. E. (1985). Hopes and Possibilities for Educational Information Systems. Paper presented at the invitational conference Information Systems and School Improvement: Inventing the Future, UCLA Centerfor the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED253560.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D., & Dobozy, E. (2018). Informing learning design through analytics: applying network graph analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 117–132, Available at https://www.ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: two case studies using support vector machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 221–240. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. (2015). Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 107–115. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1057/ejis.2013.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. Information system artefact or information system application: that is the question. (2017). Information Systems Journal, 27(6), 753–774. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. (2020). editorial: A critical look at theories in design science research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 502–519. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol21/iss3/10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., malmberg, J., haataja, E., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). What multimodal data can tell us about the students’ regulation of their learning process? Learning and Instruction. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. Available at: http://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, A., & Connell, J. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x/full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumm, A. E., Waddington, R. J., Teasley, S. D., & Lonn, S. (2014). Learning analytics. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7
   Google Scholar
• Lacity, M. C., Scheepers, R., & Willcocks, L. P. (2018). Cognitive automation as part of Deakin university’s digital strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17(2), 89–107. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol17/iss2/4/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K., & Brown, S. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25(2), 117–131. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/U736J42W0226648X.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/249596?origin=crossref
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leony, D., Pardo, A., De La Fuente Valentín, L., De Castro, D. S., & Kloos, C. D. (2012) Glass: a learning analytics visualization tool. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge pp 162–163, ACM, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., Walters, C., Hohensee, C., & Gruver, J. (2015) Leveraging failure in design research. ZDM Mathematics Education 47(6), 963–979, Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11858-015-0695-2 .
   Google Scholar
• Lwoga, E. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(1).Chicago. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/147447/
   Google Scholar
• Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2017). Learning analytics for learning design: towards evidence-driven decisions to enhance learning. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 428–433), Springer, Tallinn, Estonia. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_38.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, R., Schneider, H., & Müller, O. (2004) Hypermedia navigation concepts for lecture recordings. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2840–2847). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Washington DC, USA. Available at: http://www2.inf.uos.de/papers_pdf/2004_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2017) A multi-layered taxonomy of learning analytics applications. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2017 Proceedings, Langkawi, Malaysia. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/54/.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2018) Building an ontology of learning analytics. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2018 Proceedings Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2019) Towards ontology-based design science research for knowledge accumulation and evolution. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2020) A design methodology for learning analytics information systems: informing learning analytics development with learning design. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. M., Schiefer, J., & Tjoa, A. M. (2005) Sense & response service architecture (SARESA). In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP - DOLAP p 77, ACM Press, New York, USA. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1097002.1097015.
   Google Scholar
• Nistor, N., & Hernández-Garcíac, Á. (2018). What types of data are used in learning analytics? An overview of six cases. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(1), 335–338. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.038
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Alikhani, I., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Juuso, I., & Seppänen, T. (2019). Multimodal data to design visual learning analytics for understanding regulation of learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 100(1), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.019
   Google Scholar
• Oigara, J. N., Onchwari, G., Keengwe, J., & Global, I. G. I. (2014). Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., & SINZ, E. J. (2011). Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 7–10. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1057/ejis.2010.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. (2018). Design science research genres: Introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 129–139. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1458066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Rothenberger, M. A. (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information System, 24(3), 45–77. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 .
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Ayala, A. (2018). Learning analytics: A glance of evolution, status, and trends according to a proposed taxonomy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(3), e1243. Available at https://doi.org/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/widm.1243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 9–20. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ982669
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Bartosiak, M. Ł., Palese, B., & Rodriguez, J. (2019). Designing scalability in required in-class introductory college courses. Information & Management, 103263. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378720619300394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontual Falcão, T., Ferreira, R., Lins Rodrigues, R., Diniz, J., & Gašević, D. (2019) Students’ perceptions about learning analytics in a brazilian higher education institution. In Proceedings - IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2019 pp 204–206, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, Maceió, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann, P. (2016). Connecting learning analytics with learning research: the role of design-based research. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 130–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1210198
   Google Scholar
• Rl, J. Ø. R. N. Ø., & gynther, K. (2018). What constitutes an “actionable insight” in learning analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.13
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. D., Howell, J. A., Seaman, K., & Gibson, D. C. (2016). Student attitudes toward learning analytics in higher education: “the fitbit version of the learning world”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1), 1–11. Available at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959/full
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity To Engage Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12
   Google Scholar
• Rubio‐Fernández, A., muñoz‐Merino, P. J., & Delgado KLOOS, C. (2019). A learning analytics tool for the support of the flipped classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(5), 1168–1185. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cae.22144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Leony, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). Alas-Ka: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the Khan Academy platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 47(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J., Díaz, H., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. (2014) Towards the development of a learning analytics extension in open edX.  In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 299–306), Salamanca, Spain. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2669914
   Google Scholar
• Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2017). Knowledge discovery from the programme for international student assessment. In Peña-Ayala, A. (Ed.), Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 229–267). Springer, Cham. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_8
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Features students really expect from learning analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(1), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada, A., Konomi, S., & Ogata, H. (2018). Real-time learning analytics system for improvement of on-site lectures. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 314–331. Available at https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002764213498851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G., Gašević, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Dawson, S., Shum, S. B., Ferguson, R., Duval, E., Verbert, K., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2014) Open Learning Analytics: An integrated & modularized platform. Available at: https://solaresearch.org/core/open-learning-analytics-an-integrated-modularized-platform/.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30.Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183382/
   Google Scholar
• Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te’eni, D. (1991). Feedback in DSS as a source of control: Experiments with the timing of feedback. Decision Sciences, 22(3), 644–655. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb01287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M., Hevner, A., & Berndt, D. (2010). Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(1), 559–618. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol26/iss1/27.
   Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., & Peffers, K. (2018). Population targeted requirements acquisition. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(6), 686-711. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1476015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., Peffers, K., & Gengler, C. (2008) Wide audience requirements engineering (WARE): A practical method and case study. All Sprouts Content. Helsinki School of Economics. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_all/83.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: When and how does information become actionable knowledge? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09639-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research ( 423–438). Springer, Berlin. Available athttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31
   Google Scholar
• Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications (pp. 0002764213479363). American Behavioral Scientist.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018). Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Computers and Education, 122(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E., & Ice, P. (2012). Data changes everything: delivering on the promise of learning analytics in higher education. Educause Review, 47(4), 32. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ981214
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (2012). Information visualization: Perception for design. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers : The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wieling, M., & Hofman, W. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54(4), 992–998. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509002784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., & Mctighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development(ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 199–213. Available at: http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/submission/index.php/AJET/article/view/869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. (2008). Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 470–475. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1057/ejis.2008.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., & Jung, Y. (2019). Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 53–69. Available at: https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/JLA/article/view/6357
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, A., Zdrahal, Z., Nikolov, A., & Pantucek, M. (2013) Improving retention: Predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge pp 145–149, ACM, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, W., Guo, R., Petakovic, E., & Goggins, S. (2015). Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable Genetic Programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 47(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, M., Shimada, A., Okubo, F., Oi, M., Kojima, K., & Ogata, H. (2017). Learning analytics of the relationships among self-regulated learning, learning behaviors, and learning performance. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 13. Available at: http://telrp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41039-017-0053-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Ordóñez DE Pablos, P., & SUN, Y. (2018). Mapping the study of learning analytics in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 1142–1155. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1529198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar