1,058
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Literature Review

Extending the story of IS success: a meta-analytic investigation of contingency factors at individual and organisational levels

, &
Pages 617-640 | Received 29 Nov 2019, Accepted 04 Mar 2021, Published online: 13 Jul 2021

References

  • Al-Debei, M. M., Jalal, D., & Al-Lozi, E. (2013). Measuring web portals success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 14(1), 96–133. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2013.055555
  • Ali, N., Tretiakov, A., Whiddett, D., & Hunter, I. (2017). Knowledge management systems success in healthcare: Leadership matters. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 97, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.004
  • Au, N., Ngai, E. W., & Cheng, T. E. (2002). A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework. Omega, 30(6), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00054-3
  • Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  • Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. (2000). Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 766–801. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667019
  • Belot, M., Duch, R., & Miller, L. (2015). A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 113, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.007
  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Burton-Jones, A., & Straub, D. W. (2006). Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0096
  • Carpenter, J.P., Burks, S. and Verhoogen, E. (2005). Comparing students to workers: the effects of social framing on behavior in distribution games. In Harrison, G.W., Carpenter, J. and List, J.A. (Ed.) Field Experiments in Economics (Research in Experimental Economics,Vol. 10),Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193–2306(04)10007–0
  • Chadwick, I. C., & Raver, J. L. (2015). Motivating organizations to learn: Goal orientation and its influence on organizational learning. Journal of Management, 41(3), 957–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312443558
  • Chen, C. Y., Shih, B. Y., & Yu, S. H. (2012). Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques. Natural Hazards, 62(3), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0146-0
  • Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing–An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017
  • Chen, J. V., Rungruengsamrit, D., Rajkumar, T. M., & Yen, D. C. (2013). Success of electronic commerce Web sites: A comparative study in two countries. Information & Management, 50(6), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.007
  • Chen, Y. H., & Chengalur-Smith, I. (2015). Factors influencing students’ use of a library web portal: Applying course-integrated information literacy instruction as an intervention. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.005
  • Chiu, P. S., Chao, I. C., Kao, C. C., Pu, Y. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of mobile e-books in a cloud bookcase using the information system success model. Library Hi Tech, 34(2), 207–223
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed. ed.). Erlbaum.
  • Conn, V. S., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10092
  • Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Corley, K. G. (2004). Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57(9), 1145–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704047141
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  • Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736
  • Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161
  • Fitzgerald, G., & Russo, N. L. (2005). The turnaround of the London ambulance service computer-aided dispatch system (LASCAD). European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000541
  • Freeze, R. D., Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., & Wen, H. J. (2019). IS success model in e-learning context based on students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 4. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol21/iss2/4
  • Gharib, R. K., Philpott, E., & Duan, Y. (2017). Factors affecting active participation in B2B online communities: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 54(4), 516–530
  • Griffith, T. L. (1999). Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202132
  • Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
  • Halawi, L. A., McCarthy, R. V., & Aronson, J. E. (2007). An empirical investigation of knowledge-management systems’ success. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 121–135.
  • Hanseth, O., & Ciborra, C. (Eds.). (2007). Risk, complexity and ICT. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
  • Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
  • Hollenbeck, C. R., Mason, C. H., & Song, J. H. (2011). Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for website platforms. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311410850
  • Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2017). Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: A meta-analytic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 102, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.06.007
  • Hossain, M., Moon, J., Yun, J., & Choe, Y. (2012). Impact of psychological traits on user performance in information systems delivering customer service: IS management perspective. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.035
  • Hwang, Y., Kettinger, W. J., & Yi, M. Y. (2015). Personal information management effectiveness of knowledge workers: Conceptual development and empirical validation. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(6), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.24
  • IDC global ICT spending forecast (20182022). (2019). Available at https://www.idc.com/promo/global-ict-spending/forecast
  • Ilie, V., Van Slyke, C., Parikh, M. A., & Courtney, J. F. (2009). Paper versus electronic medical records: The effects of access on physicians’ decisions to use complex information technologies. Decision Sciences, 40(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00227.x
  • Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256350
  • King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 32.
  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761
  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810033001
  • Larsen, M. A., & Myers, M. D. (1999). When success turns into failure: A package-driven business process re-engineering project in the financial services industry. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00025-1
  • Lee, S. M., & Lee, S. H. (2012). Success factors of open-source enterprise information systems development. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(7), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211255023
  • Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013504
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE publications, Inc.
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information & Management, 1(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(78)90028-9
  • McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean’s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003010103
  • Newell, S., Swan, J. A., & Galliers, R. D. (2000). A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: The BPR example. Information Systems Journal, 10(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00079.x
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
  • Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1086/323732
  • Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  • Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7–62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
  • Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
  • Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.2307/249687
  • Po-An Hsieh, J. J., & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663
  • Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  • Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Lal, B. (2015). Examining the success of the online public grievance redressal systems: an extension of the IS success model. Information Systems Management, 32(1), 39–59
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
  • Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015). Information technology impacts on firm performance: An extension of Kohli and Devaraj (2003). MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 809–836. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.4
  • Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583
  • Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
  • Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  • Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., & Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00220
  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
  • Siu, N. Y., & Lam, K. C. J. (2009). A comparative study of ethical perceptions of managers and non-managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9824-y
  • Sørum, H., Medaglia, R., Normann Andersen, K., Scott, M., & DeLone, W. (2012). Perceptions of information system success in the public sector: Webmasters at the steering wheel? Transforming Government: People, Process & Policy, 6(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211251254
  • Stadin, M., Nordin, M., Broström, A., Hanson, L. L. M., Westerlund, H., & Fransson, E. I. (2020). Technostress operationalised as information and communication technology (ICT) demands among managers and other occupational groups–results from the Swedish longitudinal occupational survey of health (SLOSH). Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106486
  • Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
  • Stefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. Information & Management, 53(6), 717–726
  • Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(2), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
  • Valaei, N., & Baroto, M. B. (2017). Modelling continuance intention of citizens in government Facebook page: A complementary PLS approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.047
  • VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004
  • Venkatesh, V. (2006). Where to go from here? Thoughts on future directions for research on individual‐level technology adoption with a focus on decision making. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00136.x
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279078
  • Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
  • Zyphur, M. J., Zammuto, R. F., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Multilevel latent polynomial regression for modeling (in) congruence across organizational groups: The case of organizational culture research. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115588570

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.