3,456
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Are we on the right track? an update to Lyytinen et al.’s commentary on why the old world cannot publish

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 263-276 | Received 26 Nov 2019, Accepted 01 Jun 2021, Published online: 18 Jun 2021

References

  • Alves, M. A., & Pozzebon, M. (2013). How to resist linguistic domination and promote knowledge diversity? Revista De Administração De Empresas, 53(5), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020130610
  • Association for Information Systems. (2021a). AIS Special Interest Groups. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://aisnet.org/page/AISSIGs
  • Association for Information Systems. (2021b). Senior scholars’ basket of journals.  Association for Information Systems.  Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://aisnet.org/page/SeniorScholarBasket
  • Avgerou, C., Siemer, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (1999). The academic field of information systems in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000319
  • Avison, D. E., Davison, R. M., & Malaurent, J. (2018). Information systems action research: Debunking myths and overcoming barriers. Information & Management, 55(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.004
  • Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., Heddier, M., & Seidel, S. (2015). In search of information systems (grand) challenges. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(6), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0394-0
  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). The state of h index research: Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.233
  • Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach, 20(1), 11–20. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1246
  • Brusilovsky, B. Y. (1978). Partial and system forecasts in scientometrics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 12(2–3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(78)90055-0
  • Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. (2016). Research commentary—diversity of the information systems research field: A journal governance perspective. Information Systems Research, 28(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0657
  • Chan, J., Johns, F., & Moses, L. B. (2018). Academic metrics and positioning strategies. In B. Ajana (Ed.), Metric Culture (pp. 177–195). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Chen, P. C. L., & Zhang, C.-Y. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on big data. Information Sciences, 275, 314–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015
  • Chen, W., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00173.x
  • Cheon, M. J., Groven, V., & Sabherwal, R. (1993). The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity. Information & Management, 24(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(93)90060-7
  • Chu, X., Luo, X., & Chen, Y. (2019). A systematic review on cross-cultural information systems research: Evidence from the last decade. Information & Management, 56(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.08.001
  • Chua, C., Cao, L., Cousins, K., & Straub, D. (2002). Measuring researcher-production in Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3(1), 145–215. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00026
  • Clarke, R. (2007). An exploratory study of information systems researcher impact. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02201
  • Coen, C. A., & Maritan, C. A. (2011). Investing in capabilities: The dynamics of resource allocation. Organization Science, 22(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0524
  • Davison, R. M., & Bjørn‐Andersen, N. (2019). Do we care about the societal impact of our research? Information Systems Journal, 29(5), 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12259
  • Davison, R. M., & Díaz Andrade, A. (2018). Promoting indigenous theory. Information Systems Journal, 28(5), 759–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12203
  • Delgado López‐Cózar, E., Robinson‐García, N., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2014). The google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science Technology, 65(3), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23056
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kuljis, J. (2008). Profile of IS research published in the European journal of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.57
  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
  • Galletta, D. F., Bjørn-Andersen, N., Leidner, D. E., Markus, M. L., McLean, E. R., Straub, D., & Wetherbe, J. (2019). If practice makes perfect, where do we stand? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 45((1)), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04503
  • Gill, G., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2009). Whom are we informing? Issues and recommendations for MIS research from an informing sciences perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650290
  • Hansen, S., Lyytinen, K., & Markus, M. L. (2006). The legacy of “power and politics” in disciplinary discourse: A citation analysis. Proceedings of the 26th international conference on information systems, Milwaukee, USA.
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2016a). Do google scholar, scopus and the web of science speak your language? Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/do-google-scholar-scopus-and-the-web-of-science-speak-your-language
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2016b). Publish or perish. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2016c). Reflections on the h-index. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/reflections-on-the-h-index
  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9
  • Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F., & Laakso, M. (2020). Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities. Scientometrics, 122(1), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x
  • Huang, -H.-H., & Hsu, J. S.-C. (2005). An evaluation of publication productivity in information systems: 1999 to 2003. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01531
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015). A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008
  • Jiang, L., Jiang, D., & Grover, V. (2017). The sphere of influence of information systems journals: A longitudinal study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41(1), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04107
  • Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9
  • Kemal, A. A. (2019). Mobile banking in the government-to-person payment sector for financial inclusion in Pakistan. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1422105
  • Levy, M., & Germonprez, M. (2017). The potential for citizen science in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04002
  • Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Luo, X. (2007). A scientometric investigation into the validity of IS journal quality measures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(12), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00145
  • Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
  • Li, L., Gao, P., & Mao, J.-Y. (2014). Research on IT in China: A call for greater contextualization. Journal of Information Technology, 29(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.15
  • Liu, F., & Myers, M. D. (2011). An analysis of the AIS basket of top journals. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261111118322
  • Lowry, P. B., D’Arcy, J., Hammer, B., & Moody, G. D. (2016). “Cargo Cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including mechanical turk and online panels. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.06.002
  • Lowry, P. B., Karuga, G. G., & Richardson, V. J. (2007). Assessing leading institutions, faculty, and articles in premier information systems research journals. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20(1), 142–203. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02016
  • Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D., Gaskin, J., Galletta, D. F., Humpherys, S. L., Barlow, J. B., & Wilson, D. W. (2013). Evaluating journal quality and the Association for information systems senior scholars’ journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value? MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.01
  • Lukyanenko, R., Wiggins, A., & Rosser, H. K. (2019). Citizen science: An information quality research frontier. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(4), 961–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z
  • Lyytinen, K., Baskerville, R., Iivari, J., & Te’eni, D. (2007). Why the old world cannot publish? Overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000695
  • Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2007). Is there science beyond English? EMBO Reports, 8(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400906
  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
  • Mingers, J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2007). Ranking journals in business and management: A statistical analysis of the harzing data set. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000696
  • O’Malley, B. (2019). US suffers worst global ranking performance in 16 years.  University World News. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20190621130009586
  • Pan, R. K., Petersen, A. M., Pammolli, F., & Fortunato, S. (2018). The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 656–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.005
  • Pan, S. L., & Pee, L. G. (2020). Usable, in‐use, and useful research: A 3U framework for demonstrating practice impact. Information Systems Journal, 30(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12274
  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
  • Rosemann, M., & Vessey, I. (2008). Toward improving the relevance of Information Systems research to practice: The role of applicability checks. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148826
  • Schekman, R. (2013). How journals like nature, cell and science are damaging science. The Guardian. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science
  • Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148852
  • Stein, M.-K., Galliers, R. D., & Whitley, E. A. (2016). Twenty years of the European information systems academy at ECIS: Emergent trends and research topics. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.25
  • Straub, D., & Anderson, C. (2009). Journal self-citation VI: Forced journal self-citation–common, appropriate, ethical? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02506
  • Te’eni, D., Rowe, F., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Lee, J. S. (2015). Publishing and getting published in EJIS: Marshaling contributions for a diversity of genres. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(6), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.20
  • UK Research and Innovation (2021). Research excellence framework 2021. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://www.ref.ac.uk
  • United Nations (2021). Sustainable development goals.  United Nations. Retrieved February 17, 2020 from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  • Van Raan, A. F., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: Particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88(2), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0382-1
  • Venkatesh, V. (2021). AIS research ranking service. Retrieved May 17, 2021 from https://www.aisresearchrankings.org
  • Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., & Glass, R. L. (2002). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 129–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045721
  • Wang, J., Veugelers, R., & Stephan, P. (2017). Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Research Policy, 46(8), 1416–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006
  • Wiener, M., Saunders, C., Chatterjee, S., Dennis, A. R., Gregor, S., Mähring, M., & Mertens, P. (2018). Information systems research: Making an impact in a publish-or-perish world. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43(1), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04326
  • Yu, C., & Yao, W. (2017). Robust linear regression: A review and comparison. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 46(8), 6261–6282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1202271
  • Zhai, L., Li, X., Yan, X., & Fan, W. (2014). Evolutionary analysis of collaboration networks in the field of information systems. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1657–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1360-1
  • Zhang, C.-T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One, 4(5), e5429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005429