In-betweenness in ICT4D research: critically examining the role of the researcher

References

• Abdelnour, S., & Abu Moghli, M. (2021). Researching violent contexts: A call for political reflexivity. Organization, 1–24. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211030646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adida, C. L., Ferree, K. E., Posner, D. N., & Robinson, A. L. (2016). Who’s asking? Interviewer coethnicity effects in African survey data. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1630–1660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016633487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alencar, R., Aron, R. M., & Dineen, S. (1984). A reflexive space of holomorphic functions in infinitely many variables. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 90(3), 407–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1984-0728358-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: New Vistas for qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Ann, F. L. (2017). Interviewing in social science research: A relational approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Ethnicities, 2(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968020020040301
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (1963). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, A. (2004). Researching identities with multi-method autobiographies. Sociological Research Online, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y. (2018). Has the Global South become a playground for Western scholars in information and communication technologies for development? Evidence from a three-journal analysis. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2139–2153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2839-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, N. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710371235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettez, S. C. (2015). Navigating the complexity of qualitative research in postmodern contexts: Assemblage, critical reflexivity, and communion as guides. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(8), 932–954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.948096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buskens, I. (2010). Agency and reflexivity in ICT4D research: Questioning women’s options, poverty, and human development. Information Technologies & International Development, 6(SE), 19–24. https://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/617/0.html
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2011). Doing critical information systems research–arguments for a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 440–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko, E. (2004). Positionality and Praxis: Fieldwork experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavan, A. L., & Ajmera, R. (2007). When in Rome … be yourself: A perspective on dealing with cultural dissimilarities in ethnography. In N. Aykin (Ed.), Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture (pp. 33–36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla‐Duggan, R. (2007). Breaking out, breaking through: Accessing knowledge in a non‐western overseas educational setting—methodological issues for an outsider. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920601165538
   Google Scholar
• Cibangu, S. K. (2020). Marginalization of indigenous voices in the information age: A case study of cell phones in the rural Congo. Information Technology for Development, 26(2), 234–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1647403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, J., & Kindon, S. (2003). Far from being “Home Alone”: The dynamics of accompanied fieldwork. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Mazza, C. (2003). Consulting as a liminal space. Human Relations, 56(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056003612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De´, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S. K., & Chitre, C. (2018). ICT4D research: A call for a strong critical approach. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1286284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaujany, F. X., Walsh, I., & Mitev, N. (2011). An historically grounded critical analysis of research articles in IS. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., & Kleine, D. (2021). Interdisciplinarity, self-governance and dialogue: The participatory process underpinning the minimum ethical standards for ICTD/ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 27(2), 361–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1840321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delph‐Janiurek, T. (2001). (Un)consensual conversations: Betweenness, ‘material access’, laughter and reflexivity in research. Area, 33(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz Andrade, A., & Urquhart, C. (2012). Unveiling the modernity bias: A critical examination of the politics of ICT4D. Information Technology for Development, 18(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2011). Developing critical reflection as a research method. In J. Higgs, A. Titchen, D. Horsfall, & D. Bridges (Eds.), Creative spaces for qualitative researching: Living research (pp. 55–64). SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Giesen, B. (2017). Inbetweenness and ambivalence. In J. Alexander, R. Jacobs, and P. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 788–804). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giwa, A. (2015). Insider/Outsider issues for development researchers from the Global South. Geography Compass, 9(6), 316–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. J. (2014). On the inside looking in: Methodological insights and challenges on the inside looking. The Qualitative Report, 19(29), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1106
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., Imran, A., & Turner, T. (2014). A ‘sweet spot’ change strategy for a least developed country: Leveraging e-Government in Bangladesh. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 655–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve, T., & Mitchell, R. (2020). Promoting meaningful and equitable relationships? Exploring the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) funding criteria from the perspectives of African partners. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00274-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, R., L, J., Ramaboa, K., Khan, F., Dhlamini, X., & Nilsson, W. (2020). Neither Colony Nor Enclave: Calling for dialogical contextualism in management and organization studies. Organization Theory, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719879705
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. W. (2015). How ICT4D research fails the poor. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1018115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. G. (2003). ’Where are you really from?: Representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941030032005
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (2012). A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, Á., Thomassen, B., & Wydra, H. (2018). Breaking boundaries: Varieties of liminality. Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, Andrea; Abbott, Pamela; Dasuki, Salihu (2021): Retrospective reflective vignettes from paper “In-betweenness in ICT4D research: critically examining the role of the researcher”. The University of Sheffield. Dataset. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.16438716
   Google Scholar
• Joia, L. A., Davison, R. M., Andrade, A. D., & Urquhart, C. (2012). Where are the indigenous ICT for development researchers: Marginalised or uninvited? ACM Inroads, 3(4), 94–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2381083.2381106
   Google Scholar
• Kerstetter, K. (2012). Insider, Outsider, or somewhere between: The impact of researchers’ identities on the community-based research process. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27(2), Article 7.  https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol27/iss2/7
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. (2012a). “You can only interpret that which you are able to perceive”: Demonstrating critical reflexivity in ICT4D work. SIG GlobDev First Pre- ECIS Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. (2012b). Towards self-emancipation in ICT for development research: Narratives about respect, traditional leadership and building networks of friendships in Rural South Africa. The African Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), Article 1. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol4/iss2/1
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. (2018). A confessional account of community entry: Doing critically reflexive ICT4D work in a deep rural community in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 482–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1323306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, K., & Turpin, M. (2013). The emancipation of the researcher as part of information and communication technology for development work in deep Rural South Africa. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 59(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2013.tb00416.x
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. E. M. (2021). Demonstrating critically reflexive ICT4D project conduct in rural South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 1–28, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1928588
   Google Scholar
• Kreps, D., & Bass, J. M. (2019, May). Southern theories in ICT4D. In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 3–13). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., Ladeira, I., Roberson, J., Bidwell, N. J., Rangaswamy, N., Sambasivan, N., & Gitau, S. (2010). Gender matters: Female perspectives in ICT4D research. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD’10). ACM, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., & Hodge, W. A. (2019). Toward multi-dimensional and developmental notion of researcher positionality. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mama, A. (2007). Is it ethical to study Africa? Preliminary thoughts on scholarship and freedom. African Studies Review, 50(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.2005.0122
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, T. (2005). Practising performativity transformative moments in research. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805054273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias, B. D., & Smith, A. D. (2016). Autobiographies in organizational research: Using leaders’ life stories in a triangulated research design. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 204–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115618761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. (2017). Liminal geopolitics: The subjectivity and spatiality of diplomacy at the margins. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00187.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNess, E., Arthur, L., & Crossley, M. (2015). ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: Revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, R. (2016). An alternative to ‘alternative development’?: Buen vivir and human development in Andean countries. Oxford Development Studies, 44(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1144733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M. Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370120490
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, L. (2016). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum, 30(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwangi, N. (2019). “Good that you are one of us”: Positionality and reciprocity in conducting fieldwork in Kenya’s Flower industry. In Johnstone L. (eds) The politics of conducting research in Africa (pp. 13–33). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95531-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. A. (1996). A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The “outsider phenomenon” in rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393249
   Google Scholar
• Obasi, C. (2014). Negotiating the insider/outsider continua: A Black female hearing perspective on research with Deaf women and Black women. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112465632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M. (2018). Frugal or fair? The unfulfilled promises of frugal innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S., Racz, M., & Palmer, P. (2020). Reflexive learning and performative failure. Management Learning, 51(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620903170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pousti, H., Urquhart, C., & Linger, H. (2020). Researching the virtual: A framework for reflexivity in qualitative social media research. Information Systems Journal, 31(3), 1–28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasopoulou, E. (2017). A half-moon on my skin: A memoir on life with an activity tracker. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0040-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prommegger, B., Thatcher, J. B., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2021). When your data has COVID-19: How the changing context disrupts data collection and what to do about it. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1841573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri, S. K., & Sahay, S. (2007). Role of ICTs in participatory development: An Indian experience. Information Technology for Development, 13(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20058
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2015). Are we making a better world with Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1080428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Myers, M. D. (2013). Information technology offshoring in India: A postcolonial perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabo, O. (2012). Disjunctures and diaspora in Kiran Desai’s the inheritance of loss. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 47(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989412450697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelenz, L., & Pawelec, M. (2021). Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) critique. Information Technology for Development, 1–24, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1937473
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3250978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharabati-Shahin, M. H. N., & Thiruchelvam, K. (2013). The role of Diaspora in university-industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: The case of Palestine. Higher Education, 65(5), 613–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soedirgo, J., & Glas, A. (2020). Toward active reflexivity: Positionality and practice in the production of knowledge. American Political Science Association, 53(3), 527–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519002233
   Google Scholar
• Soeftestad, L. T., Consult, S., & Sein, M. K. (2003). ICT and development: East is east and west is west and the twain may yet meet. In S. Madon & S. Krishna (Eds.), In the digital challenge: information technology in the development context (pp. 63–82).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P. (2006). Reconciling multiple researcher positionalities and languages in international research. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2006.1.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. (2014). Interpretive accounts and fairy tales: A critical polemic against the empiricist bias in interpretive IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A., Schwarz, M., & Spicer, A. (2006). Guess who’s coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy. Human Relations, 59(7), 929–960. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706067597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. Acme, 6(3), 374–385. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. (2017). Reflexivity. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, & W. Liu (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Geography (pp. 1–5). American Cancer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., & Saebo, O. (2011). Demystifying the possibilities of ICT4D in the mountain regions of Nepal. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IIEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5718727
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, B. (2018). Thinking with Liminality. In Á. Horváth, B. Thomassen, & H. Wydra (Eds.), Breaking boundaries: Varieties of liminality (pp. 39–58). Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Toyama, K. (2011). Technology as amplifier in international development. Proceedings of the 2011 IConference, 75–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940772
   Google Scholar
• Tshuma, N., & Krauss, K. (2017, July 10). Towards using critical reflection to interrogate the oppressive effects of educational technology use in South African higher education. African Conference on Information Systems & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2005). Learning about being critical. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2020). South-South and triangular cooperation in ICT4D. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(4), e12130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrick, E. M., Hussen, T. S., Kibutu, J., & Ngoqo, B. (2016). African identity and HCI methods that inform technology design. Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 242–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2998581.2998619
   Google Scholar
• Wickert, C., & Schaefer, S. M. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713519279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., & Andersson, A. (2018). Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1396020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar