References
- Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
- Avison, D., Kock, N., & Malaurent, J. (2017). Special issue: Action research in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(3), 630–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1372995
- Baham, C., & Hirschheim, R. (2021). Issues, challenges, and a proposed theoretical core of agile software development research. Information Systems Journal, Early Access, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12336
- Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., & Rossi, M. (2018). Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00495
- Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice or relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/249403
- Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, 81(5) ,41–56. https://hbr.org/2003/05/it-doesnt-matter.
- Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- Dutt, R. (2020). Combating the toll of digital pollution. Sloan Management Review.
- European Journal of Information Systems. (2020). Special issue call for papers: Clinical research from information systems practice. https://www.journalconferencejob.com/ejis-si-clinical-research-informati
- Fletcher, K. E., & Huff, A. S. (1990). Argument mapping. In A. S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 355–402). John Wiley & Sons.
- Gartner. (2021). Positioning technology players within a specific market. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/magic-quadrants-research
- Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2006). Composing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Gupta, A. (2017). Editorial thoughts: What and how ISR publishes. Information Systems Research, 28(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0691
- Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Beacon press.
- Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2003). Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(10), 237–293. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00037
- Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x
- Kim, A., Lahiri, A., Dey, D., & Kane, G. (2019). Just enough’Piracy can be a good thing: MIT sloan management review, 61(1), 13–14. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/just-enough-piracy-can-be-a-good-thing/ .
- Kim, A., Lahiri, A., & Dey, D. (2018). The” Invisible hand” of piracy: An economic analysis of the information-goods supply chain. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1117–1141. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2018/14798.
- Lang, M. (2003). Communicating academic research findings to IS professionals: An analysis of problems. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.28945/511
- Lee, A. (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/249407
- Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
- Piccoli, G. (2019). Editors’ comments. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), iii–v. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol18/iss3/1.
- Rai, A. (2017). Editor’s comments: The MIS Quarterly as a platform for engagement. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), iii–vii. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol41/iss3/2/.
- Rai, A. (2019). Editor’s comments: Engaged scholarship: Research with practice for impact. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), iii–viii. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol43/iss2/2/.
- Sloan Management Review. (2020). Managing technology. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/topic/managing-technology/
- Te’eni, D., Seidel, S., & Vom Brocke, J. (2017). Stimulating dialog between information systems research and practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(6), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0067-9
- Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.