864
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How IT carve-out project complexity influences divestor performance in M&As

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 962-988 | Received 01 Jul 2020, Accepted 25 May 2022, Published online: 14 Jul 2022

References

  • Anselmi, C., & Autry, J. (2010). Managing the It Aspects of a Large-Scale Divestiture. Intel.
  • Applegate, L. M., Watson, E., & Vatz, M. (2007). Royal DSM N. V.: information technology enabling business transformation. Harvard Business School.
  • Baker, E. W., & Niederman, F. (2014). Integrating the is functions after mergers and acquisitions: Analyzing business-IT alignment. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.08.002
  • Benbya, H., Leidner, D. E., & Preston, D. (2019). Mis quarterly research curation on information systems alignment research. MIS Quarterly Research Curations. MIS Quarterly. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www.misqresearchcurations.org/blog/2019/3/14/information-systems-alignment
  • Benitez, J., Ray, G., & Henseler, J. (2018). Impact of information technology infrastructure flexibility on mergers and acquisitions. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13245
  • Böhm, M., Nominacher, B., Fähling, J., Leimeister, J. M., Yetton, P., & Krcmar, H. 2010. ”It challenges in m&a transactions–the it carve-out view on divestments,” in: International Conference on Information Systems. St Louis.
  • Böhm, M., Henningsson, S., Leimeister, J. M., Yetton, P., & Krcmar, H., ”A Dual View on IT Challenges in Corporate Divestments and Acquisitions” (2011). ICIS 2011 Proceedings. 20. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/organization/20 Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China, December 4-7, 2011. ICIS 2011 Proceedings. 20. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/organization/20 Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2011 2011, ISBN 978-0-615-55907-0
  • Böhm, M. (2015). It-Bezogene Herausforderungen Im Kontext Von Unternehmensdesinvestitionen: Ein Erklärungsansatz Für Den It-Desintegrationserfolg. In Fakultät für Informatik. Technische Universität München. (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München). https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1280083/file.pdf
  • Booth, A., & Geller, G. (eds.). (2008). Wired for winning? managing it effectively in M&A. Deloitte.
  • Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2014). Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21434
  • Brauer, M. (2006). What have we acquired and what should we acquire in divestiture research? A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 32(6), 751–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306292879
  • Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the is functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/249521
  • Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1998). Reconceptualizing the context-design issue for the information systems function. Organization Science, 9(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.176
  • Broyd, R., & Storch, B. (2006). Carve to Measure. In B. W. Wirtz (Ed.), Handbuch mergers & acquisitions management (pp. 1221–1237). Gabler Verlag.
  • Buchta, D., Eul, M., & Schulte-Croonenberg, H. (2009). Strategisches It-Management: Wert Steigern, Leistung Steuern, Kosten Senken (3 ed.). Gabler Verlag.
  • Busquets, J. (2015). Discovery paths: exploring emergence and it evolutionary design in cross-border M&as. analysing grupo Santander’s acquisition of Abbey(2004–2009). European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.38
  • Capron, L., Dussauge, P., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America,1988-1992. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199807)19:7<631::AID-SMJ963>3.0.CO;2-9
  • Chakravarthy, B., & Henderson, J. (2007). From a hierarchy to a heterarchy of strategies: adapting to a changing context. Management Decision, 45(3), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710745160
  • Christensen, J. F. 1998. ”The dynamics of the diversified corporation and the role of central management of technology.” Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Working Paper No. 98-4. DRUID working paper.
  • Ciborra, C., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Hepsø, V., Failla, A., Hanseth, O., Ljungberg, J., & Monteiro, E. (2000). From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • Coltman, T., Tallon, P., Sharma, R., & Queiroz, M. (2015). Strategic it alignment: twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.35
  • Cresap, P., Singh, V., Bradford, K., McCracken, T., & Houston, M. (2020). Stranded by It (in a Divestiture). LinkedIn Post. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stranded-divestiture-patrick-cresap/
  • Cristo, D. A., & Falk, R. W. (2006). Spinoffs and carveouts: some factors leading to successful divestiture, Competition Forum:. American Society for Competitiveness. 331.
  • Deloitte. (2016). Think Logically About Logical Separation.
  • Desai, V. (2018). Carve-Outs Vs. M&A. LinkedIn Post. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/carve-outs-vs-ma-vid-desai/
  • Du, K., & Tanriverdi, H. 2010. The performance effects of transitional it services in corporate spin-offs International conference on information systems (ICIS), St. Louis, p. Paper 248.
  • Du, K., & Tanriverdi, H. 2014. Managing information technology under extreme organizational disequilibrium: the case of corporate spinoffs, in: International conference of information systems (ICIS), M. Myers & D. W. Straub (eds.). Auckland, New Zealand: AIS.
  • Du, K. (2015). parenting new acquisitions: acquirers’ digital resource redeployment and targets’ performance improvement in the U.S. hospital industry, Information Systems Research (26:4), pp. 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0604
  • Dudek, K., Krestyn, J., & Viraphan, P. (2020). IT Transitional Service Agreements (IT TSAs): How much are they needed?. Deloitte. Accessed April 4, 2022, from https://www2.deloitte.com/ch/en/pages/financial-advisory/articles/it-transitional-service-agreements.html
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770. https://doi.org/10.5465/256337
  • EY. (2019).Will You Set the Divestment Pace, or Try to Keep up with It?
  • Fähling, J., Böhm, M., Leimeister, J. M., Yetton, P., & Krcmar, H. 2010. ”Managing the it carve-out in a sbu divestment,” in: 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS). Pretoria, South Africa: Association for Information Systems.
  • Fonstad, N. O., & Subramani, M. (2009). Building enterprise alignment: A case study. MIS Quarterly Executive, 8(1), 31–41. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol8/iss1/5
  • Fontaine, A. (2012). Information technology implications in corporate mergers, acquisitions, and demergers. Emory University.
  • Fubini, D., Park, M., & Thomas, K. (2013). Profitably Parting Ways: Getting More Value from Divestitures. McKinsey & Company.
  • Gartner. (2019). Gartner says the average time to close an m&a deal has risen more than 30 percent in the last decade. Gartner. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-10-15-gartner-says-the-average-time-to-close-an-manda-deal-has-risen-more-than-30-percent-in-the-last-decade.
  • Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of it–business strategic alignment through the past. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1159–1186. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.10
  • Gillingham, I., & Stimpson, M. (2008). A way to design and manage tsas to achieve a fast and clean separation. In Deloitte Perspectives. Deloitte. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/mergers-acqisitions/us-ma-consulting-fastbreak-080908.pdf
  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
  • Gregory, R. W., & Piccinini, E. (2013). The nature of complexity in is projects and programmes. Paper presented at 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, Netherlands. Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/96
  • Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2021). Digital M&a, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365
  • Harroch, R. D., Lipkin, D. A., & Smith, R. V. 2018. What you need to know about mergers & acquisitions: 12 key considerations when selling your company. Forbes.
  • Hedman, J., & Sarker, S. (2015). Information system integration in mergers and acquisitions: research ahead. European Journal of Information Systems. 24(2), 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.2
  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472
  • Henningsson, S., & Carlsson, S. (2011). The dysiim model for managing is integration in mergers and acquisitions. Information Systems Journal, 21(5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00374.x
  • Henningsson, S. (2015). Learning to acquire: How serial acquirers build organisational knowledge for information systems integration. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 121–144.. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.18
  • Henningsson, S., & Kettinger, W. J. (2016). Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: a configurational perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 942–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1267516
  • Henningsson, S., Yetton, P. W., & Wynne, P. J. (2018). A review of information system integration in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Information Technology, 33(4), 255–303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0051-9
  • Hirschheim, R., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Detours in the path toward strategic information systems alignment. California Management Review, 44(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166112
  • Hsu, J., & Chen, E. T. (2006). The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Information Systems: A Case of a Software Industry Acquisition. Communications of the IIMA, 6(1), 6. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima/vol6/iss1/6
  • Hu, N., Li, L., Li, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Do Mega-Mergers Create Value? the acquisition experience and mega-deal outcomes. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55(January), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.004
  • Jain, R. P., & Ramesh, B. (2015). The roles of contextual elements in post-merger common platform development: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.42
  • Johnston, K., & Yetton, P. W. (1996). Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger - fit, compatibility and models of change. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(96)80003-5
  • Joy, J. (2018). Divestitures and Spin-Offs: Lessons Learned in the Trenches of the World’s Largest M&a Deals. Springer.
  • Lee, G., & Xia, W. 2002. Development of a measure to assess the complexity of information systems development projects. International conference of information systems, Barcelona, Spain. : (p. 8). Association for Information Systems: Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Leimeister, S., Leimeister, J. M., Fähling, J., & Krcmar, H. 2008. Exploring success factors for it carve out projects, 16th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Galway, Ireland (pp. 1764–1776). Atlanta, Georgia: Association for Information Systems.
  • Leimeister, J. M., Böhm, M., & Yetton, P. (2012). Managing it in a business unit divestiture. Management Information Systems Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 37–48. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol11/iss1/6
  • Luu, A., & Thomsen, J. (2019). ”Solving the carve-out conundrum,”. McKinsey & Company.
  • Makadok, R. (2010). The interaction effect of rivalry restraint and competitive advantage on profit: Why the whole is less than the sum of the parts. Management Science, 56(2), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1102
  • Makadok, R., Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). Invited editorial: the four theories of profit and their joint effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385697
  • Markus, M. L. (2001). Reflections on the systems integration enterprise. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj.2001.15707caf.001
  • Mehta, M., & Hirschheim, R. (2007). Strategic alignment in mergers and acquisitions: theorizing is integration decision making. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(3), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00118
  • Müller, H. (2006). Demerger-management. In B. W. Wirtz (Ed.), Handbuch mergers & acquisitions management (pp. 1186–1207). Gabler Verlag.
  • Pflügler, C., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2015). Coping with it carve-out projects-towards a maturity model. Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 1664–1678). https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2015/111.
  • Powell, T. C., & Dent‐Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
  • Quaadgras, A., Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2014). Management commitments that maximize business impact from it. Journal of Information Technology, 29(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.7
  • Queiroz, M. (2017). Mixed Results in Strategic It Alignment Research: A Synthesis and Empirical Study. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0024-z
  • Queiroz, M., Tallon, P. P., Coltman, T., Sharma, R., & Reynolds, P. (2020). Aligning the it portfolio with business strategy: evidence for complementarity of corporate and business unit alignment. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3), 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101623
  • Ratzer, P., Weber, J., Krcmar, H., Weiss, D., Brinkmann, M., & Böhm, M. (2014). Dear CFO, why IT does matter within M&A transactions: Insights & Recommendations (Deloitte Insights, Issue. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/mergers-acqisitions/IT-MA-Studie.pdf Accessed 4 April 2022
  • Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring the Linkage between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/249542
  • Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250980
  • Reynolds, P. J., & Yetton, P. W. (2015). Aligning business and it strategies in multi-business organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.1
  • Robbins, S. S., & Stylianou, A. C. (1999). Post-merger systems integration: the impact on is capabilities1both authors have contributed equally to this research1. Information & Management, 36(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00018-X
  • Rolland, K. H., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018). Managing digital platforms in user organizations: the interactions between digital options and digital debt. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0788
  • Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard business press.
  • Slaughter, S. A., Levine, L., Ramesh, B., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2006). Aligning Software Processes with Strategy. Mis Quarterly), 30(4), 891–918. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148758
  • Stylianou, A. C., Jeffries, C. J., & Robbins, S. S. (1996). Corporate Mergers and the Problems of Is Integration. Information & Management, 31, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01082-8
  • Tallon, P. P. (2007). A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240308
  • Tallon, P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T. R., & Sharma, R. (2016). Business process and information technology alignment: construct conceptualization, empirical illustration, and directions for future research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(9), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00438
  • Tanriverdi, H., & Du, K. 2009. “Disintegrating information technology in corporate divestures: implications for regulatory compliance risks and costs,” International conference on information systems H. Chen & S. Slaughter (eds.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for Information Systems.
  • Tanriverdi, H., & Uysal, V. B. (2015). When it capabilities are not scale-free in merger and acquisition integrations: how do capital markets react to it capability asymmetries between acquirer and target? European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.22
  • Thomas, T., Swinteck, B., & Altman, T. 2017. Day one readiness: enabling business continuity through effective execution of complex transactions Deloitte Perspectives. Deloitte.
  • Thomson, O. N. E. 2021. Mergers & Acquisitions Database. Refinitiv.
  • Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational it architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0206
  • Toppenberg, G., Shanks, G., & Henningsson, S. (2015). How cisco systems used enterprise architecture capability to sustain acquisition-based growth. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(4), 151–168. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol14/iss4/5
  • van Es, R. V., Mehta, S., & Albert, G. 2014. Making Transitional Service Agreements Work. Accenture. Retrieved 8 September 2021 from https://www.accenture.com/us-en/~/media/accenture/conversion-assets/dotcom/documents/global/pdf/strategy_5/accenture-making-transitional-service-agreements-work.pdf
  • Weber, R. (2003). Theoretically speaking. Management Information Systems Quarterly(MISQ), 27(3), iii–xii. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036536
  • Weber, R. (2012). Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00284
  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). It governance: how top performers manage it decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Press.
  • Wiedemann, A., Wiesche, M., Gewald, H., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Understanding how DevOps aligns development and operations: A tripartite model of intra-it alignment. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1782277
  • Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R., & Fa, R. T. A. (2006). Post-merger it integration strategies: an it alignment perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.002
  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). Transaction cost economics and the Carnegie connection. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00898-0
  • Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045831
  • Yetton, P. W., Henningsson, S., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2013). “Ready to Acquire”: the it resources required for a growth-by-acquisition business strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(1), 19–35. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol12/iss1/4
  • Zhang, M., Chen, H., & Lyytinen, K. (2020). Validating the coevolutionary principles of business and is alignment via agent-based modeling. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1801360

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.