Unpacking digital options thinking for innovation renewal: a clinical inquiry into car connectivity

References

• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world (Vol. 4). Harvard Business School Press Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.2307/258597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009). Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organization Science, 20(2), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, S. (2020, January 26). Why and how Volvo embraces agile at scale. Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28(9), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Beyond valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT project management. California Management Review, 47(2), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Yoo, Y. (2014). The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 25(3), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., Scarbrough, H., & Panourgias, N. (2018). Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Information and Organization, 28(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., Johnson, J., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026–3048. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulatilaka, N., & Venkatraman, N. (2001). Strategic options in the digital Era [Article]. Business Strategy Review, 12(4), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00187
   Google Scholar
• Mankevich, V., & Svahn, F. (2021). Resourcing digital competence in product development. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oborn, E., Barrett, M., Orlikowski, W., & Kim, A. (2019). Trajectory dynamics in innovation: developing and transforming a mobile money service across time and place. Organization Science, 30(5), 1097. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., Mathiassen, L., & Napier, N. (2014). Digital options theory for IT capability investment. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(7), 422–453. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork. SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1995). Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: Are they the same? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949510093830
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2008). Clinical inquiry/research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (2 ed., pp. 266–279). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Multiple scenario development: Its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., & Beretta, M. (2020). The gordian knot of practicing digital transformation: Coping with emergent paradoxes in ambidextrous organizing structures*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2): 166–191. doi:10.1111/jpim.12548.
   Google Scholar
• Suseno, Y., Laurell, C., & Sick, N. (2018). Assessing value creation in digital innovation ecosystems: A social media analytics approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms:How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannou, M., & Westerman, G. (2012). Volvo cars corporation: Shifting From a B2B to a “B2B+ B2C” Business Model. MIT Sloan School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy [Article]. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
   Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R., Griffith, T., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar