11,629
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Research

Developing human/AI interactions for chat-based customer services: lessons learned from the Norwegian government

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 10-22 | Received 12 Oct 2020, Accepted 28 Jun 2022, Published online: 07 Jul 2022

References

  • Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2019). Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001
  • Aoki, N. (2020). An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490
  • Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021). The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS Artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15882
  • Barnett, A., Savic, M., Pienaar, K., Carter, A., Warren, N., Sandral, E., Manning, V., & Lubman, D. I. (2020). Enacting ‘more-than-human’care: Clients’ and counsellors’ views on the multiple affordances of chatbots in alcohol and other drug counselling. International Journal of Drug Policy, 94, 102910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102910
  • Baskerville, R. L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. (2015). Genres of inquiry in design-science research: justification and evaluation of knowledge production. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.02
  • Benbunan-Fich, R., Desouza, K. C., & Andersen, K. N. (2020). IT-enabled innovation in the public sector: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814989
  • Bernhard, E., Recker, J., & Burton-Jones, A. (2013). Understanding the actualization of affordances: A study in the process modeling context. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013), Milan, Italy, Association for Information Systems (AIS).
  • Burton-Jones, A., Butler, B., Scott, S., & Xu, S. (2021). Next-generation information systems theorizing: A call to action. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 45(1), 301–314. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2021/15434.
  • Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
  • Fowler, M. (2018). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Fromm, J., Mirbabaie, M., & Stieglitz, S. (2020). A systematic review of empirical affordance studies: Recommendations for affordance research in information systems. ECIS.
  • Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2021). Cognitive challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research.
  • Gartner. (2017). Gartner says by 2020, Artificial Intelligence will create more jobs than it eliminates. www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2017-12-13-gartner-says-by-2020-artificial-intelligence-will-create-more-jobs-than-it-eliminates
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea. Technovation, 34(10), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.006
  • Lacity, M., Willcocks, L., & Gozman, D. (2021). Influencing information systems practice: The action principles approach applied to robotic process and cognitive automation. Journal of Information Technology, 36(3), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396221990778
  • Lehrig, T., Krancher, O., & Dibbern, J. (2017). How users perceive and actualize affordances: An exploratory case study of collaboration platforms. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea. Association for Information Systems (AIS).
  • Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04
  • Liang, H., Peng, Z., Xue, Y., Guo, X., & Wang, N. (2015). Employees’ exploration of complex systems: An integrative view. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029402
  • Lommatzsch, A. (2018). A next generation chatbot-framework for the public administration. International Conference on Innovations for Community Services,
  • Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
  • Mathiassen, L., & Nielsen, P. A. (2008). Engaged scholarship in IS research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 3–20. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol20/iss2/1/
  • Mehr, H. (2017). Artificial intelligence for citizen services and government. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation. Harvard Kennedy School. https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf
  • Mesgari, M., & Okoli, C. (2019). Critical review of organisation-technology sensemaking: Towards technology materiality, discovery, and action. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1524420
  • Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021). Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186
  • National Assoc of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). (2020). Chat with us: How states are using chatbots to respond to the demands of COVID-19. https://www.nascio.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NASCIO_ChatbotsRespondtoCOVID-19.pdf
  • Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration - NAV. (2021). NAV R&D-plan 2021-2025. https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/kunnskap/fou-midler/nyheter/nav-har-fatt-ny-fou-plan#:~:text=NAVs%20FoU-plan%202021-2025
  • Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation. (2020). National strategy for Artificial Intelligence. www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/1febbbb2c4fd4b7d92c67ddd353b6ae8/en-gb/pdfs/ki-strategi_en.pdf
  • Opland, L. E., Pappas, I. O., Engesmo, J., & Jaccheri, L. (2022). Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 143(April 2022), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.038
  • Pentland, B., Yoo, Y., Recker, J., & Kim, I. (2022). From lock-in to transformation: A path-centric theory of emerging technology and organizing. Organization Science, 33(1), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1543
  • Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. AMCIS 2014 Proceedings,
  • Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
  • Rybnicek, R., & Königsgruber, R. (2019). What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics, 89(2), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6
  • Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  • Schein, E. H. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Schein, E. H. 2008. Clinical inquiry/research.In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.).Handbook of action research, 266–279. SAGE Publications.
  • Seidel, S., Recker, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2013). Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: Functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1275–1299. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.13
  • Stendal, K., Thapa, D., & Lanamäki, A. (2016). Analyzing the concept of affordances in information systems. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS),
  • Syvänen, S., & Valentini, C. (2020). Conversational agents in online organization–stakeholder interactions: A state-of-the-art analysis and implications for further research. Journal of Communication Management, 24(4), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2019-0145
  • Vassilakopoulou, P., & Grisot, M. (2020). Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: A process model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3), 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101617
  • Velsberg, O., Westergren, U. H., & Jonsson, K. (2020). Exploring smartness in public sector innovation-creating smart public services with the Internet of Things. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1761272
  • Waizenegger, L., Seeber, I., Dawson, G., & Desouza, K. (2020). Conversational agents-exploring generative mechanisms and second-hand effects of actualized technology affordances. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences,
  • Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 114–123. https://hometownhealthonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ai2-R1804J-PDF-ENG.pdf