Clinical research from information systems practice

References

• Adair, J. G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2004). Special issue on action research in information systems: Making is research relevant to practice–foreword. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1998). Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, K., Kensing, F., & Simonsen, J. (2011). Participatory design in information systems development. In H. Isomäki & S. Pekkola (Eds.), Reframing humans in information systems development (pp. 115–134). Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones, A., Oborn, E., Padmanabhan, B., Boh, W. F., & Kohli, R. (2021). Advancing research transparency-A view from MISQ. AIS Research Exchange, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Dodd, Mead & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Grønlund, A., & Guohua, B. (1993). Participatory information systems - information systems as venues for participation. In D. Avison, J. E. Kendall, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Human, organizational and social dimensions of information systems development IFIP transactions A-24 (pp. 193–240). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Halupa, C. M. (2021). Action research in practice-based doctoral programs. In R. Throne (Ed.), Practice-Based and practice-led research for dissertation development (pp. 137–164). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design science research in information systems. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216. https://doi.org/10.1145/67933.67937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., & Gregor, S. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenman, S. G. (n.d.). Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/ucla/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lanamäki, A., Stendal, K., & Thapa, D. (2011). Mutual informing between is academia and practice: Insights from KIWISR-5. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29, 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02907
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiassen, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15(4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840210453115
   Google Scholar
• Mathiassen, L., Chiasson, M., & Germonprez, M. (2012). Style composition in action research publication. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiassen, L., & Nielsen, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship in is research – the Scandinavian case. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110384771
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A. (2017). Editor’s comments: Diversity of design science research. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), iii–xviii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R. (1970). Three dilemmas of action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677002300601
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2020). The realist rationality of evidence-based management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Vaishnavi, V. K., & Kuechler, W. (2015). Design science research methods and patterns: Innovating information and communication technology (2nd. ed.). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Gau, M., & Mädche, A. (2021). Journaling the design science research process. Transparency about the making of design knowledge. In K. L. Chandra, S. Seidel, & G. I. Hausvik (Eds.), The next wave of sociotechnical design. DESRIST 2021 (pp. 131–136). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020). Special issue editorial–accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: A journey through time and space. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. (2008). Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zusman, A. (2017). Changing degrees: Creation and growth of new kinds of professional doctorates. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar