Contextual Constraint Treatment for coarse coding deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: Generalisation to narrative discourse comprehension

REFERENCES

• Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravetz, S. (1998). Cerebral hemisphere asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36, 691–700. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00141-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, R. A., Burgess, C., & Keeney, M. (1999). The effect of time course on the facilitation of semantic features in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychology, 13(3), 389–403. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., & Thompson, C. K. (1999). Treatment and generalization of complex sentence production in agrammatism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 690–707. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4203.690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & R. Treiman. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Washington University. Retrieved from http://elexicon.wustl.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Bayles, K. A., & Tomoeda, C. K. (1993). Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia. Tucson, AZ: Canyonlands Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. (1993). Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80–120. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychological Review, 16(4), 161–169. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, E., & Bryan, K. (1996). Right cerebral hemisphere damage: Incidence of language problems. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 19, 47–54. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199603000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K. S., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Judgment of Line Orientation. In Contributions to neuropsychological assessment (pp. 44–54). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., Sivan, A. B., Hamsher, K. S., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1994). Visual form discrimination. In Contributions to neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed., pp. 65–72). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M. L. (2009). Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: Effects of contextual bias. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 52(2), 373–384. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0172)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. L. (2011). Cognitive communication disorders associated with right hemisphere brain damage In M. L. Kimbarow (Ed.), Cognitive communication disorders (pp. 119–168). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M. L., & Lesniewicz, K. (2005). Contextual bias and predictive inferencing in adults with and without right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 19, 423–434. doi: 10.1080/02687030444000868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2003). Evaluating practice—Guidelines for the accountable professional (4th Edn.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1993). Discourse Comprehension Test. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310–321. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90022-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language, 33, 86–103. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(88)90056-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byiers, B. J., Reichle, J., & Symons, F. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 21, 397–441. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C. (2003). Parallel system for processing language: Hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain. In M. T. Banich & M. Mack (Eds.), Mind, brain & language: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 229–247). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, H., Payer, M., Giroux, F., & Joanette, Y. (2007). Towards a description of clinical communication impairment profiles following right-hemisphere damage. Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 739–749. doi: 10.1080/02687030701192331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23, 1311–1337. doi: 10.1080/02687030902756439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 958–968. doi: 10.3758/BF03195780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshanks, K. J., Wiley, T. L., Tweed, T. S., Klein, B. E., Klein, R., Mares-Perlman, J. A., & Nondahl, D. M. (1998). Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 148(9), 879–886. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M., Bracy, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2007). Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 21(12), 1181–1194. doi: 10.1080/02687030600980950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M., O'Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14(3), 251–268. doi: 10.1080/026870300401469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Bost, J. E., Ross, K. B., Wambaugh, J. L., Hula, W. D., & Mikolic, J. M. (2007). The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1389–1398. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9247-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Mikolic, J. M., Prieto, L., Hula, W. D., Lustig, A. P., … Elman, R. J. (2004). The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 997–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., Lee, F., Klein, A. J., Matthews, L. J., & Lam, C. F. (1995). Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 490–502. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3802.490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test: Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fassbinder, W., & Tompkins, C. (2006). Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: Alternative interpretations of current evidence. Aphasiology, 20(2/3/4), 110–122. doi: 10.1080/02687030500472397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Hodgson, C., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2003). The application of errorless learning to aphasic disorders: A review of theory and practice. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(3), 337–363. doi: 10.1080/09602010343000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). The treatment of anomia using errorless learning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16(2), 129–154. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. W., Kelley, M. E., & Lomas, J. E. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 387–406. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2001). Complexity in phonological treatment: Clinical factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 229–241. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–206. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., & Kasher, A. (2000). Differential effect of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 63–83. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678865
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J. (2006). Cognitive rehabilitation: The role of theoretical rationales and respect for the maturational process needed for our evidence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21, 194–197. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200603000-00011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Conceptual blending and metaphor. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Ska, B., & Côté, H. (2004). Protocole Montréal d’ évaluation de la communication (MEC). Isbergues: Ortho Édition.
   Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 712–718. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler, D., Van Lancker, D., Merchman, V., & Bates, E. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 327–349. doi: 10.1080/87565649909540753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, R. P., & de Haan, E. H. (2003). Implicit learning in memory rehabilitation: A meta-analysis on errorless learning and vanishing cues methods. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(6), 805–814. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.6.805.16474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 773–787. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2005). Processing homonymy and polysemy: Effects of sentential context and time-course following unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language, 95, 365–382. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman-Blake, M. T., & Tompkins, C. A. (2001). Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 639–654. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/052)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, C. L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997a). The use of contextual information by right-brain damaged individuals in the resolution of ambiguous pronouns. Brain and Language, 57, 309–342. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, C. L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997b). The use of contextual information related to general world knowledge by right brain-damaged individuals in pronoun resolution. Brain and Language, 57, 343–359. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, K., Brownell, H., Cayer-Meade, C., Milione, J., & Kearns, K. (2011). Treating metaphor interpretation deficits subsequent to right hemisphere brain damage: Preliminary results. Aphasiology, 25, 456–474. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.500809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., McKinley, L. N., & Thompson, A. G. (2004). Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 421–431. doi: 10.3758/BF03195590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mashal, N., & Faust, M. (2008). Right hemisphere sensitivity to novel metaphoric relations: Application of the signal detection theory. Brain & Language, 104, 103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language, 100, 115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., & Schwartz, M. F. (2012). Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 138–168. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.639619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, P. S. (1979). Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 38–46). Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P. S., & Linebaugh, C. W. (1981). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions by right-hemisphere-damaged adults. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 254–261). Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
   Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain & Language, 55, 293–316. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L., & Chiarello, C. (1995). Depth of associated activation in the cerebral hemispheres: Mediated versus direct priming. Neuropsychologia, 33, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00102-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R. R. (2004). A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R. R., & Schultz, M. C. (1998). A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: An adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology, 12, 787–810. doi: 10.1080/02687039808249573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2006). Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and state of the science. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 266–291. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., Shapiro, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(3), 591–607. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/047)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T., & Carhart, R. (1966). An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6) (Technical Report No. SAM-TR-66-55). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Aerospace Medical Division (AFSC).
   Google Scholar
• Titone, D. (1998). Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 65, 361–394. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A. (1990). Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 307–316. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3302.307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A. (1991). Automatic and effortful processing of emotional intonation after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 820–830. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3404.820
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Baumgaertner, A., Lehman, M. T., & Fassbinder, W. (2000). Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: Suppression and enhancement in lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 62–78. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4301.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Blake, M. L., Meigh, K. M., & Wambaugh, J. (2011). A novel, implicit treatment for language comprehension processes in right hemisphere brain damage: Phase I data. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 789–799. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.539784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Bloise, C. G., & Timko, M. L. (1994). Working memory and inference revision in brain damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Reaserch, 37, 896–912. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3704.896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Boada, R., & McGarry, K. (1992). The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 626–637. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3503.626
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Fassbinder, W., Blake, M. L., Baumgaertner, A., & Jayaram, N. (2004). Inference generation during text comprehension by adults with right hemisphere brain damage: Activation failure versus multiple activation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1380–1395. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/103)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Fassbinder, W., Scharp, V. L., & Meigh, K. M. (2008). Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults. Aphasiology, 22, 119–138. doi: 10.1080/02687030601040861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Klepousniotou, E., & Gibbs Scott, A. (2012). Nature and assessment of right hemisphere disorders. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 297–343). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Lehman-Blake, M. T., Baumgaertner, A., & Fassbinder, W. (2001). Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: Suppression in inferential ambiguity resolution. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 400–415. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/033)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Gibbs Scott, A., & Meigh, K. M. (in preparation). Suppression in polarized ambiguity processing after right hemisphere brain damage.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Meigh, K., Blake, M. L., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2012). Generalization of a novel, implicit treatment for coarse coding deficit in right hemisphere brain damage: A single subject experiment. Aphasiology, 26, 689–708. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.676869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., Meigh, K. M., & Fassbinder, W. (2008). Coarse coding and discourse comprehension in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 22, 204–223. doi: 10.1080/02687030601125019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. (1987). Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar