Propositional speech in unselected stroke: The effect of genre and external support

REFERENCES

• Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, S., McMillan, C., Gross, R. G., Cook, P., Morgan, B., Boller, A, … Grossman, M. (2011). The organization of narrative discourse in Lewy Body Spectrium Disorder. Brain and Language, 119, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badre, D., & D'Esposito, M. (2007). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 2082–2099. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels-Tobin, L. R., & Hinckley, J. J. (2005). Cognition and discourse production in right hemisphere disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 461–477. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L. (1968). Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia, 6, 53–60. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(68)90038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Wayland, S., Rochon, E., Saffran, E., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Quantitative Production Analysis: A training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, T., Kulke, F., & Blanken, G. (2008). The influence of word frequency on semantic word substitutions in aphasic naming. Aphasiology, 22, 1313–1320. doi: 10.1080/02687030701679436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, T., Wallesch, C. W., & Blanken, G. (2008). Verbal planning in a case of Dynamic Aphasia: An impairment at the level of macroplanning, Neurocase, 14, 431–450. doi: 10.1080/13554790802459478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 236–249. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Armstrong, L., & Mackenzie, C. (2006). An examination over time of language and discourse production abilities following right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 291–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, P., & Shallice, T. (1997). The Hayling and Brixton tests: Test manual. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, F., Mondani, M., Skrap, M., & Shallice, T. (2009). Semantic access dysphasia resulting from left temporal lobe tumours. Brain, 132, 87–102. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castner, J. E., Chenery, H. J., Silburn, P. A., Coyne, T. J., Sinclair, F., Smith, E. R., & Copland, D. A. (2008). Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on noun/verb generation and selection from competing alternatives in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 79, 700–705. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.118729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castner, J. E., Copland, D. A., Silburn, P. A., Coyne, T. J., Sinclair, F., & Chenery, H. J. (2007). Lexical-semantic inhibitory mechanisms in Parkinson's disease as a function of subthalamic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3167–3177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., Anand, R., Sparks, G., & Cullum, C. M. (2006). Gist distinctions in healthy cognitive aging versus mild Alzheimer's disease. Brain Impairment, 7, 223–233. doi: 10.1375/brim.7.3.223
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., Gamino, J. F., Cook, L.G., Hanten, G., Li, X., & Levin, H. S. (2006). Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury. Brain and Language, 97, 178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, L. S. (1998). Pragmatics and discourse: An introduction. In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden, & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 1–8). Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Copland, D. A., Sefe, G., Ashley, J., Hudson, C., & Chenery, H. J. (2009). Impaired semantic inhibition during lexical ambiguity repetition in Parkson's disease. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 45, 943–949. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews, 3, 201–215. doi: 10.1038/nrn755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 125–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A., & Warrington, E. K. (1989). Dynamic aphasia: The selective impairment of verbal planning. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 25, 103–114. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80010-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescentini, C., Lunardelli, A., Mussoni, A., Zadini, A., & Shallice, T. (2008). A left basal ganglia case of dynamic aphasia or impairment of extra-language cognitive processes? Neurocase: The Neural Basis of Cognition, 14, 184–203. doi: 10.1080/13554790802108380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescentini, C., Shallice, T., Del Missier, F., & Macaluso, E. (2010). Neural correlates of episodic retrieval: An fMRI study of the part-list cueing effect. NeuroImage, 50, 678–692. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden, B. M. & Duncan, J. (2012). Task difficulty manipulation reveals multiple demand activity but no frontal lobe hierarchy. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 532–540. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128, 615–627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstad, T., Almkvist, O., Viitanen, M., & Arnesen, E. (2003). Impaired motor speed, visuospatial episodic memory and verbal fluency characterize cognition in long-term stroke survivors: The Tromsø study. Neuroepidemiology, 22, 326–331. doi: 10.1159/000072921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, T., Giles, E., Xuereb, J., & Hodges, J. (1996). Progressive supranuclear palsy presenting with dynamic aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 60, 403–410. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.4.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, C., & Antonucci, S. M. (2012). Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion. Aphasiology, 6, 64–82. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.602390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P. C., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). “Sculpting the Response Space” – An Account of Left Prefrontal Activation at Encoding. NeuroImage, 12, 404–417. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D. (2000). The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action, as revealed by functional imaging. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 549–565). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster, J. M. (1997). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, E., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1996). Performance on the Boston Cookie theft picture description task in patients with early dementia of the Alzheimer's type: Missing information. Aphasiology, 10, 4, 395–408. doi: 10.1080/02687039608248419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, M., Nadeau, S. E., Jacobs, D. H., Adair, J. C., Rothi, L. J. G., & Heilman, K. M. (1997). Adynamic aphasia: A transcortical motor aphasia with defective semantic strategy formation. Brain and Language, 57, 374–393. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., Hickin, J., & Best, W. (2010). Phonological and orthographic cueing therapy: A case of generalized improvement. Aphasiology, 24, 991–1016. doi: 10.1080/02687030903168220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5, 267–285. doi: 10.3109/02699059109008097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jefferies, E., Hoffman, P., Jones, R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2008). The impact of semantic impairment on verbal short-term memory in stroke aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 66–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2008). Deficits of knowledge versus executive controls in semantic cognition: Insights from cued naming. Neuropsychologia, 46, 649–658.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Gotman, M., & Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: The invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 653–674. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90070-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koechlin, E., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science, 302, 1181–1185. doi: 10.1126/science.1088545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2012). Predicting story goodness performance from cognitive measures following traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech – Language Pathology, 21, S115–S125A. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0114)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê, K., Mozeiko, J., & Coelho, C. (2011). Discourse analyses: Characterizing cognitive-communication disorders following TBI. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110215/Discourse-Analyses.htm
   Google Scholar
• Legg, C. F., & Sonnenberg, B. R. (1998). Changes in aspects of speech and language functioning following unilateral pallidotomy. Aphasiology, 12, 257–266. doi: 10.1080/02687039808249454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223–232. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E. C., Williams, S. E., & Volpe, A. D. (1995). The effects of topic and listener familiarity on discourse variables in procedural and narrative discourse tasks. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 39–55. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(95)91023-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M., McCall, D., Virata, T., & Berndt, R. S. (2007). Widening the temporal window: Processing support in the treatment of aphasic language production. Brain and Language, 100, 53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., McCall, D., & Berndt, R. S. (2004). Supported versus unsupported narrative elicitation: Impact on language production in aphasia. Brain and Language, 91, 44–46. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Kohn, S. E. (2001). Computer-based training of language production: An exploratory study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11, 57–96. doi: 10.1080/09602010042000178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Why does lexical selection have to be so hard? Comment on Abdel Rahman and Melinger's swinging lexical network proposal. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 735–748. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R. A., & Warrington, C. K. (1984). A two-route model of speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 107, 463–485. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.2.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, P., & Warrington, E. K. (1980). Testing for nominal dysaphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 43, 781–788. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.9.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mink, J. W. (1996). The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology, 50, 381–425. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00042-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228–258. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., Shallice, T., Robinson, G., MacPherson, S., Turner, S., Woollett, K., … Cipolotti, L. (2013). Impairments in proverb interpretation following focal frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2075–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. E., & Willison, J. (1991). The National Adult Reading Test (2nd ed.). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Nys, G. M. S., van Zandvoort, M., van der Worp, H., Kappelle, L., & de Haan, E. (2006). Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of perseverative responses in subacute stroke. Brain, 129, 2148–2157. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323–330. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90047-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M. P., Gillingham, S. (2006). Keeping time: Effects of focal frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1195–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A. R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–734. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1976). Advanced progressive matrices, set 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymer, A., Rowland, L., Haley, M., & Crosson, B. (2002). Nonsymbolic movement training to improve sentence generation in transcortical motor aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 16, 493–506. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. A. (2013). Primary progressive dynamic aphasia and Parkinsonism: Generation, selection and sequencing deficits. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2534–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Blair, J., & Cipolotti, L. (1998). Dynamic aphasia: An inability to select between competing verbal responses. Brain, 121, 77–89. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.1.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Shallice, T., Bozzali, M., & Cipolotti, L. (2010). Conceptual proposition selection and the LIFG: Neuropsychological evidence from a focal frontal group. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1652–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Shallice, T., Bozzali, M., & Cipolotti, L. (2012). The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests. Brain, 135, 2022–2214. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Shallice, T., & Cipolotti, L. (2005). A failure of high level verbal response selection in progressive dynamic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 661–694. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Shallice, T., & Cipolotti, L. (2006). Dynamic aphasia in progressive supranuclear palsy: A deficit in generating a fluent sequence of novel thought. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1344–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berdnt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 3, 440–479. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadden, B. B., Burnette, R. B., Eikenberry, B. R., & DiBrezzo, R. (1991). All discourse tasks are not created equal. Clinical Aphasiology: Proceedings of the Conference, 20, 327–341.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. (2000). Discourse production in right brain damaged subjects: The effects of discourse genre and task, and attentional mechanisms. Paper presented at the 9th International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. (2007). Multi-level discourse analysis: A feasible approach. Aphasiology, 21, 375–393. doi: 10.1080/02687030600911435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K. (2012). Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P. C., & Douglas, J. M. (2000). Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding. Brain Injury, 14, 397–415. doi: 10.1080/026990500120510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., Holmes, G., & Walshe, F. M. R. (1932). Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson. (Vols. 2, Reprint 1996 Edn.). Nijmegen: N. J. M. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N., Kozak, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and Animal Naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., & Chapman, S. B. (1990). Narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 180–198). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence (pp. 539–588). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1989). The Queen Square Screening Test for Cognitive Deficits. London: Institute of Neurology.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1991). The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K., McKenna, P., & Orpwood, L. (1998). Single word comprehension: A concrete and abstract word synonym test. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 143–154. doi: 10.1080/713755564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition. Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Healy, H., & Ellis, N. (1999). The effect of imageability and predictability of cues in autobiographical memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 555–579. doi: 10.1080/713755828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar