External memory aids for memory problems in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

References

• Allen, D. N., Goldstein, G., Heyman, R. A., & Rondinelli, T. (1998). Teaching memory strategies to persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 35(4), 405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D. N., Longmore, S., & Goldstein, G. (1995). Memory training and multiple sclerosis: A case study. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 1(3), 189–202. doi:10.1007/bf02214731
   Google Scholar
• Amato, M. P., Zipoli, V., & Portaccio, E. (2008). Cognitive changes in multiple sclerosis. Expert Review of Neuotherapeutics, 8(10), 1585–1596. doi:10.1586/14737175.8.10.1585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Emslie, H., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1994). Doors and people: Test of visual and verbal recall and recognition. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. K. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, S., & Kesselring, J. (2009). Neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 160(2), 46–51. doi: 10.4414/sanp.2009.02043
   Google Scholar
• Ben Ari, E., Hertzman, G., Mosberg-Galili, R., & Hellmann, M. (2012). Cognitive rehabilitation: Functional strategies, problem-solving, and self-management skills for clients with multiple sclerosis. Paper presented at 17th Annual Conference of Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis, RIMS 2012, Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brissart, H., Leroy, M., & Debouverie, M. (2010). Première évaluation d'un programme de remédiation cognitive chez des patients atteints de sclérose en plaques: PROCOG-SEP. Revue Neurologique, 166(4), 406–411. doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2009.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brissart, H., Leroy, M., Morele, E., Baumann, C., & Debouverie, M. (2011). Efficacy of a cognitive program: PROCOG-SEP. Paper presented at 21st Meeting of the European Neurological Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Brissart, H., Leroy, M., Morele, E., Baumann, C., Spitz, E., & Debouverie, M. (2013). Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Neurocase, 19(6), 553–565. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2012.701644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., FitzGerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72. doi:10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. E., das Nair, R., Schwartz, A. F., & Lincoln, N. B. (2014). Group memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: A feasibility randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(6), 552–561. doi:10.1177/0269215513512336
   Google Scholar
• Chouliara, N. (2013). The development of a questionnaire assessing the outcome of memory rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Langenbahn, D. M., Braden, C., Malex, J. F., Kalmar, K., Fraas, M., … Ashman, T. (2011). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 519–530. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Nair, R., Ferguson, H., Stark, D. L., & Lincoln, N. B. (2012). Memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(3), Art. No.: CD008754.
   Google Scholar
• das Nair, R., & Lincoln, N. B. (2012). Evaluation of rehabilitation of memory in neurological disabilities (ReMiND): A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(10), 894–903. doi:10.1177/0269215511435424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. M., Cockburn, J. M., Wade, D. T., & Smith, P. T. (1995). A subjective memory assessment questionnaire for use with elderly people after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9(3), 238–244. doi:10.1177/026921559500900310
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, T. (2008). PDAs as cognitive aids for people with multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 18–27. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.1.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gich, J., Ramio-Torrenta, L., Menendez, R., Freixanet, J., Garcia, R., Vilanova, K., & Genis, D. (2011). Efficacy of a cognitive rehabilitation programme for patients with multiple sclerosis: “EM-line! Project”. Paper presented at 21st Meeting of the European Neurological Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. C., & Creed, F. H. (1994). Depression, cognitive impairment and social stress in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(3), 193–201. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90115-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilewski, M. J., Zelinski, E. M., & Schaie, K. W. (1990). The memory functioning questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age. Psychology and Aging, 5(4), 482–490. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.5.4.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., Best, C., & O'Neill, B. (2012). Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: A systematic review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 1–19. doi:10.1017/s1355617711001548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. (1992). General health questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart, J., Lamping, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Riazi, A., & Thompson, A. (2001). The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain, 124(5), 962–973. doi:10.1093/brain/124.5.962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M., Cullen, B., McGee-Lennon, M., Brewster, B., & Evans, J. J. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 419–444. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.825632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., Bamer, A. M., Yorkston, K. M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Use of cognitive aids and other assistive technology by individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 4(1), 1–8. doi:10.1080/17483100802239648
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Joode, E., van Heugten, C., Verhey, F., & van Boxtel, M. (2010). Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(8), 701–714. doi:10.1177/0269215510367551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jønsson, A., Korfitzen, E. M., Heltberg, A., Ravnborg, M. H., & Byskov-Ottosen, E. (1993). Effects of neuropsychological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 88(6), 394–400. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1993.tb05366.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardiasmenos, K. S., Clawson, D. M., Wilken, J. A., & Wallin, M. T. (2008). Prospective memory and the efficacy of a memory strategy in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 22(6), 746–754. doi:10.1037/a0013211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselring, J. (2004). Neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis what is the evidence-base? Journal of Neurology, 251, 25–29. doi:10.1007/s00415-004-1405-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, D. W. & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Cognitive problems in multiple sclerosis. MS Management, 3, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• LaRocca, N. G., Ritvo, P. G., Miller, D. M., Fischer, J. S., Andrews, H., & Paty, D. W. (1996). “Quality of life” assessment in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: Current status and strategies for improving multiple sclerosis clinical trial design. In D. E. Goodkin & R. A. Rudick (Eds.), Multiple sclerosis: Advances in clinical trial design, treatment and future perspectives (pp. 145–160). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, N. B., Dent, A., & Harding, J. (2003). Treatment of cognitive problems for people with multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 10(9), 412–416. doi:10.12968/bjtr.2003.10.9.13495
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, N. B., Dent, A., Harding, J., Weyman, N., Nicholl, C., Blumhardt, L. D., & Playford, E. D. (2002). Evaluation of cognitive assessment and cognitive intervention for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72(1), 93–98. doi:10.1136/jnnp.72.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83(8), 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantynen, A., Rosti-Otajarvi, E., Koivisto, K., Lilja, A., Huhtala, H., & Hamalainen, P. (2014). Neuropsychological rehabilitation does not improve cognitive performance but reduces perceived cognitive deficits in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 20(1), 99–107. doi:10.1177/1352458513494487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2003). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clinical Oral Investigations, 7(1), 2–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Multiple Sclerosis Society. (2006). Expert opinion paper: Assessment and management of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. New York: The Multiple Sclerosis Society.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, A. R., Chiaravalloti, N., Goverover, Y., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: A review of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 761–769. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poser, C. M., Paty, D. W., Scheinberg, L., McDonald, W. I., Davis, F. A., Ebers, G. C., … Tourtellotte, W. W. (1983). New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology, 13(3), 227–231. doi:10.1002/ana.410130302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosiegel, M., & Michael, C. (1993). Neuropsychology and multiple sclerosis: Diagnostic and rehabilitative approaches. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 115, S51–S54. doi:10.1016/0022-510x(93)90209-h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramio, I. T. L. L., Gich, J., Menendez, R., Freixanet, J., Garcia, R., Vilanova, J. C., & Genis, D. (2010). Efficacy of a cognitive rehabilitation programme: “EM line! Project”. Paper presented at 26th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, ECTRIMS, 15th Annual Conference of Rehabilitation in MS, RIMS, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. M. (1995). Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis. Current Opinion in Neurology, 8, 216–220. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199506000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti-Otajarvi, E. M., & Hamalainen, P. I. (2011). Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(11).
   Google Scholar
• Rosti-Otajarvi, E. M., & Hamalainen, P. I. (2014). Neuropsychological rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(2). Art. No.: CD 009131.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, G. A., Beebe, G., Kibler, R. F., Kurland, L. T., Kurtzke, J. F., McDowell, F., … Willmon, T. L. (1965). Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: Report by the panel on the evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 122(1), 552–568. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20235.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevil, E., & Finlayson, M. (2010). Pilot study of a cognitive intervention program for persons with multiple sclerosis. Health Education Research, 25(1), 41–53. doi:10.1093/her/cyp037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeel, R. L., & Edwards, S. (2001). The assessment and rehabilitation of memory impairments. In B. Johnstone & H. H. Stonnington (Eds.), Rehabilitation of neuropsychological disorders: A practical guide for rehabilitation professionals (pp. 419–440). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Solari, A., Motta, A., Mendozzi, L., Pucci, E., Forni, M., Mancardi, G., & Pozzilli, C. (2004). Computer-aided retraining of memory and attention in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 222(1–2), 99–104. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2004.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuifbergen, A. K., Becker, H., Perez, F., Morison, J., Kullberg, V., & Todd, A. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(10), 882–893. doi:10.1177/0269215511434997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E. & Baddeley, A. D. (1984). Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 341–357. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90229-3
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Percides, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the single-case experimental design (SCED) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(4), 385–401. doi:10.1080/09602010802009201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perceides, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(5), 619–638. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, N., Bandion, K., & Baumhackl, U. (2005). Efficacy of a neuropsychological training programme for patients with multiple sclerosis – A randomised controlled trial. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 117(21–22), 747–754. doi:10.1007/s00508-005-0470-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. W., Thomas, S., Hillier, C., Galvin, K., & Baker, R. (2006). Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, 2006(1), Art. No.:CD004431.
   Google Scholar
• Topcular, B., Bingol, A., Yildiz, S., Guclu, I., Yandim Kuscu, D., Soysal, A., … Siva, A. (2010). What to do in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive involvement? Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation: Is it a treatment option? Paper presented at 26th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, ECTRIMS, 15th Annual Conference of Rehabilitation in MS, RIMS, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer, A. K., & Rick, J. B. (2002). Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(1), P19–P27. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.1.p19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2001). Interpreting SF&-36 summary health measures: A response. Quality of Life Research, 10(5), 405–413. doi: 10.1023/A:1012588218728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). WMS-III administration of scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. J. G., Scott, J. G., & Adams, R. L. (1996). Traumatic brain injury. In R. L. Adams, O. A. Parsons, J. L. Cultbertson, & S. J. Nixon (Eds.), Neuropsychology for clinical practice: Etiology, assessment, and treatment of common neurological disorder (pp. 9–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1985). The rivermead behavioural memory test. London: Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Emslie, H., Foley, J., Shiel, A., Watson, P., & Hawkins, K. (2005). The Cambridge prospective memory test (CAMPROMPT). London: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Emslie, H. C., Quirk, K. & Evans, J. J. (2001). Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 70, 477–482. doi:10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A. & Moffat, N. (1984). Clinical management of memory problems. Bury St Edmunds: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., & Watson, P. C. (1996). A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment. Memory, 4, 465–486. doi:10.1080/741940776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar