The use of a smartwatch as a prompting device for people with acquired brain injury: a single case experimental design study

References

• Baldwin, V. N., Powell, T., & Lorenc, L. (2011). Factors influencing the uptake of memory compensations: A qualitative analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21, 484–501. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.582378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Patience, M. (2014). Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 464–491. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.868361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulté, I., & Onghena, P. (2012). When the truth hits you between the eyes: A software tool for the visual analysis of single-case experimental data. Methodology, 8, 104–114. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, S. F., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2004). Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: Incorporating the degree of interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 780–791. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Edgington, E. S. (1972). An additive method for combining probability values from independent experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 80, 351–363. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1972.9924813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2003). Rehabilitation of executive deficits. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory and practice. Studies in neuropsychology: Development and cognition (pp. 54–55). New York/Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In N. Hancock & P. A. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods, 4, 324–341. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, M., Moeyaert, M., Verkempynck, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Vervloet, M., Ugille, M., & Onghena, P. (2016, March 2). Testing the intervention effect in single-case experiments: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Journal of Experimental Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1123667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubley A. M., & Jassal, S. (2006). Comparability of the Rey-Osterrieth and modified Taylor complex figures using total scores, completion times, and construct validation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1482–1497. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M., Cullen, B., McGee-Lennon, M., Brewster, S., & Evans, J. J. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 419–444. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.825632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. V., & Fiske, D. W. (1953). Models for testing the significance of combined results. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 375–382. doi: 10.1037/h0057844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single case designs technical documentation. In What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (version 1.0). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lemoncello, R., Sohlberg, M. M., Fickas, S., & Prideaux, J. (2011). A randomised controlled crossover trial evaluating television assisted prompting (TAP) for adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21, 825–846. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.618661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolov, R., Solanas, A., Sierra, V., & Evans, J. J. (2011). Choosing among techniques for quantifying single-case intervention effectiveness. Behavior Therapy, 42, 533–545. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, A., Haslam, C., Yates, P., Gurr, B., Leeder, G., & Sayers, A. (2011). Google calendar: A new memory aid to compensate for prospective memory deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21, 784–807. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.598405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee-Lennon, M., Smeaton, A., & Brewster, S. (2012, May). Designing home care reminder systems: Lessons learned through co-design with older users. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Cryer, J., & Byrns, G. (2006). Controlling baseline trend in single-case research. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 418–444. doi: 10.1037/h0084131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. J. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, S., Adams, M., & Atterton, L. (2007). A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation. Brain Injury, 21, 401–411. doi: 10.1080/02699050701252030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda, E., Richards, B., Leach, L., & Mertens, V. (2012). Pda and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: Application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 408–427. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.652498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Brlow, H., Horner, R., … Wilson, B. (2016). The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/arc0000026
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n -of-1 trials: The 15-item risk of bias in N -of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulle, A., & Hux, K. (2006). Improvement patterns among survivors of brain injury: Three case examples documenting the effectiveness of memory compensation strategies. Brain Injury, 20, 101–109. doi: 10.1080/02699050500309684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., Parker, R.I., & Gonen, O. (2011). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (version 1.0). [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from http://www.singlecaseresearch.org/calculators/nap
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnock, D., McGee-Lennon, M., & Brewster, S. (2013, April). Multiple notification modalities and older users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, pp. 1091–1094. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler memory scale (WMS-IV). New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2011). Test of premorbid functioning. UK version (TOPF UK). London, UK: Pearson Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). The rivermead behavioural memory test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Emslie, H. C., Quirk, K., & Evans, J. J. (2001). Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 70, 477–482. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Evans, J. J., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., & Emslie, H. (1997). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 239–250). London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Evans, J. J., Emslie, H., & Malinek, V. (1997). Evaluation of NeuroPage: A new memory aid. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 63, 113–115. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.1.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Gracey, F., & Evans, J. J. (2009). Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory, models, therapy and outcome. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Shiel, A., Foley, J., Emslie, H., Groot, Y., Hawkins, K., & Watson, P. (2005). Cambridge test of prospective memory (CAMPROMPT). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar