Typicality-based semantic treatment for anomia results in multiple levels of generalisation

References

• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2016). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4 (version 1.1-12). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16(4), 161–169. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3), 236–249. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. doi: 10.1310/tsr1706-411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2017). Semantic treatments for word and sentence production deficits in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 38(01), 052–061. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94–98. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. In The Cochrane Collaboration (Ed.), Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Chichester: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., McHugh, R. E., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1080/026870300401513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. A., & Stanton, S. T. (2005). Semantic feature analysis as a functional therapy tool. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science & Disorders, 32, 85–92. 8p. doi: 10.1044/cicsd_32_F_85
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, C., Nessler, C., Wright, S., & Wambaugh, J. (2015). Semantic feature analysis: Further examination of outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), S864–S879. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Roches, C. A., Balachandran, I., Ascenso, E. M., Tripodis, Y., & Kiran, S. (2015). Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1015. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Roches, C. A., Mitko, A., & Kiran, S. (2017). Relationship between self-administered cues and rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with aphasia: Understanding individual responsiveness to a technology-based rehabilitation program. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam, J., Copland, D., O’Brien, K., Burfein, P., Khan, A., & Rodriguez, A. D. (2017). Influence of cognitive ability on therapy outcomes for anomia in adults with chronic poststroke aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 60(2), 406. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Kiran, S. (2006). Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49(4), 729–748. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, N., Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P., & Kiran, S. (2018). The multidimensional nature of aphasia: Using factors beyond language to predict treatment-induced recovery.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (2001). The revised Boston naming test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 441–461. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90246-9
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. A. (1995). Testing the prototype theory of concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 686–708. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, N. (2012). The use of semantic- and phonological-based feature approaches to treat naming deficits in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(6), 518–553. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.663051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, N., & Frome, A. (2011). The use of a modified semantic features analysis approach in aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(4), 459–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2001). Cognitive linguistic quick test: Examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A., Winell, H., & Zeileis, A. (2016). Coin: Conditional inference procedures in a permutation test framework (version 1.1-3). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coin
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). The psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia battery-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S. (2007). Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 18–29. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S. (2008). Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: Further evidence for semantic complexity. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1550–1568. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0038)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Johnson, L. (2008). Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Evidence from well-defined categories. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(4), 389–400. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/06-0085)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., Ntourou, K., & Eubank, M. (2007). The effect of typicality on online category verification of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia. Aphasiology, 21(9), 844–866. doi: 10.1080/02687030600743564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., Sandberg, C., & Sebastian, R. (2011). Treatment of category generation and retrieval in aphasia: Effect of typicality of category items. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54(4), 1101. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0117)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003a). Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain and Language, 85(3), 441–450. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00064-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003b). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46(4), 773–787. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensson, J., Behrns, I., & Saldert, C. (2015). Effects on communication from intensive treatment with semantic feature analysis in aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(4), 466–487. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.973359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (version 2.0-33). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
   Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., Snell, C., Fillingham, J. K., Conroy, P., & Sage, K. (2010). Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(2), 289–305. doi: 10.1080/09602010903237875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, S., Beeson, P. M., & Holland, A. L. (1995). The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming performance of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 109–114. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0404.109
   Google Scholar
• Madden, E., Robinson, R., & Kendall, D. (2017). Phonological treatment approaches for spoken word production in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 38(01), 062–074. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meier, E. L., Johnson, J. P., Villard, S., & Kiran, S. (2017). Does naming therapy make ordering in a restaurant easier? Dynamics of co-occurring change in cognitive-linguistic and functional communication skills in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 266. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, E. L., Lo, M., & Kiran, S. (2016). Understanding semantic and phonological processing deficits in adults with aphasia: Effects of category and typicality. Aphasiology, 30(6), 719–749. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1081137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16(10/11), 935–979. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Reuter, K. A. (2010). A discourse-based approach to semantic feature analysis for the treatment of aphasic word retrieval failures. Aphasiology, 24(9), 971–990. doi: 10.1080/02687030903058629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1995). Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 291–321. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Studio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: R Studio. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ralph, M. A. L., Moriarty, L., & Sage, K. (2002). Anomia is simply a reflection of semantic and phonological impairments: Evidence from a case-series study. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 56–82. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107(3), 460–499. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider, J. D., Wright, H. H., Marshall, R. C., & Page, J. L. (2008). Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 161–172. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/016)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. T., Patterson, K., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2015). Disorders of representation and control in semantic cognition: Effects of familiarity, typicality, and specificity. Neuropsychologia, 76, 220–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., & Olson, A. (2011). Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: Implications for a new model of speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 62(2), 151–192. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, C., & Best, W. (2013). “Penguins don’t fly”: An investigation into the effect of typicality on picture naming in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27(7), 784–798. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.751579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, C., & Kiran, S. (2014). How justice can affect jury: Training abstract words promotes generalisation to concrete words in patients with aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(5), 738–769. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.899504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F. (2013). Theoretical analysis of word production deficits in adult aphasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120390–20120390. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanczak, L., Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (2006). Typicality-based learning and generalisation in aphasia: Two case studies of anomia treatment. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 374–383. doi: 10.1080/02687030600587631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (1989). Generalization research in aphasia: A review of the literature (Vol. 18, pp. 195–222). Presented at the clinical aphasiology conference, College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Lukic, S., King, M. C., Mesulam, M. M., & Weintraub, S. (2012). Verb and noun deficits in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia: The northwestern naming battery. Aphasiology, 26(5), 632–655. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.676852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46(3), 591–607. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/047)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 30–42. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., & Ferguson, M. (2007). Application of semantic feature analysis to retrieval of action names in aphasia. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(3), 381–394. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.05.0038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Mauszycki, S., Cameron, R., Wright, S., & Nessler, C. (2013). Semantic feature analysis: Incorporating typicality treatment and mediating strategy training to promote generalization. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S334–S369. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0070)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Mauszycki, S., & Wright, S. (2014). Semantic feature analysis: Application to confrontation naming of actions in aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2013.845739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Whitworth, A., & Morris, J. (2015). Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 29(11), 1240–1264. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2017). tidyverse: Easily install and load the “Tidyverse” (Version R package version 1.2.1.). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
   Google Scholar
• Wisenburn, B., & Mahoney, K. (2009). A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1338–1352. doi: 10.1080/02687030902732745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar