Loss of friendship following traumatic brain injury: A model grounded in the experience of adults with severe injury

References

• AIHW. (2007). Disability prevalence and trends. Disability series, AIHW Bulletin 55, Dec. Canberra, AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic groups (2nd ed.). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, S., & Douglas, J. (2000). The social integration of individuals with aphasia. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 2, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, H., & Batson, M. (2009). Exercise intervention in brain injury: A pilot randomized study of Tai Chi Qigong. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 589–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluff, R. (2005). Grounded theory: The methodology. In I. Holloway (Ed.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 147–167). Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., Davidson, B., Worrall, L., & Howe, T. (2013). “Making a good time”: The role of friendship in living successfully with aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, J. (2004). Grounded theory analysis: Coming to data with questioning minds. In V. Minichiello, G. Sullivan, K. Greenwood, & R. Axford (Eds.), Research methods for nursing and health science (2nd ed., pp. 624–673). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B., Samter, W., & Lucchetti, A. (1992). Similarity in communication values as a predictor of friendship choices: Studies of friends and best friends. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 260–276.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, L., Sloan, S., & Winkler, D. (2005). Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: Principles of occupational therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(3), 257–260.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., & Tyrer, P. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ, 321, 694–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, E., Paterson, B., Scott-Findlay, S., Ehnfors, M., & Ehrenberg, A. (2007). Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain damage. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1361–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2004). Americans satisfied with number of friends, closeness of friendships. Gallup. http://news.gallup.com/poll/10891/americans-­satisfied-­number-­friends-­closeness-­friendships.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cattelani, R., Tanzi, F., Lombardi, F., & Mazzucchi, A. (2002). Competitive re-employment after severe traumatic brain injury: Clinical, cognitive and behavioural predictive variables. Brain Injury, 16(1), 51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 8, 243–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. Morse, P. Noerager Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. Clarke (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–193). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, L., Nellis, S. M., Whitaker, C. J., Martyr, A., Markova, I. S., Roth, I., … Morris, R. G. (2012). Marital Relationship Quality in Early-Stage Dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 26, 148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., Youse, K., & Le, K. (2002). Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 16, 659–672.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical research Council guidance. BMJ, 33, a1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 39–65). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., Klassen, A., Plano Clark, V., & Smith, K. for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Worrall, L., & Hickson, L. (2006). Quantifying aphasic people’s social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology, 20, 1210–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, B., Howe, T., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Togher, L. (2008). Social participation for older people with aphasia: The impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15, 325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, K., Douglas, J., & Serry, T. (in press). Personal narrative approaches in rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: A synthesis of qualitative research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degges-White, S., & Van Tieghem, J. (2015). Toxic friendships. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Delle Fave, A., Brdar, A., Wissing, M., & & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2013). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 517–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikman, S., Machamer, J., Powell, J., & Temkin, N. (2003). Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 1449–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2010). Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 365–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2013). Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27(1), 60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2015). Elizabeth usher memorial lecture: Placing therapy in the context of the self and social connection. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2017). “So that’s the way it is for me – always being left out.” Acquired pragmatic language impairment and social functioning following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 18, 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., Drummond, M., Knox, L., & Mealings, M. (2015). Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: Traumatic brain injury as a case study (chapter 8). In K. McPherson, B. E. Gibson, & A. Leplege (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation theory (pp. 137–162). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., Dyson, M., & Foreman, P. (2006). Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference? Brain Impairment, 7, 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., & Spellacy, F. (1996). Indicators of long-term family functioning following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Brain Injury, 10, 819–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., & Spellacy, F. J. (2000). Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury, 14, 71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M. (2007). Psychosocial and emotional outcomes 10 years following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(5), 278–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames, P., Cotterill, G., Kneale, T., Storrar, A., & Yeomans, P. (1996). Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a long-term follow-up study. Brain Injury, 10, 631–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensel, W., & Woelfel, M. (1986). Measuring the instrumental and expressive functions of social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, & W. Ensel (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 129–152). Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, A., Douglas, J., & O’Halloran, R. (2018). The experience of close personal relationships from the perspective of people with aphasia: Thematic analysis of the literature. Aphasiology, 32(4), 367–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotiadou, D., Northcott, S., Chatzidaki, A., & Hilari, K. (2014). Aphasia blog talk: How does stroke and aphasia affect a person’s social relationships? Aphasiology, 28, 1281–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genyus Network. http://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/sundayafternoon/caleb-rixon-stroke-survivor/8779380
   Google Scholar
• Hadorn, D., Sorenson, J., & Holte, J. (1995). Large-scale health outcomes evaluation: How should quality of life be measured? Part II – Questionnaire validation in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, R. A., Rapport, L. J., Wertheimer, J., & Koviak, C. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of peer mentoring for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their significant others. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 1297–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien, D., Gilboa, A., Vakil, E., & Donovick, P. (2001). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10?20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury, 15, 189–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, J., Landis, K., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett, B., & Teasdale, G. (1981). Management of head injuries. Contemporary neurology series. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jetten, J., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., & A, S. (2012). The social Cure: Identity, health & wellbeing. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., & Davis, P. (1998). A supported relationships intervention to increase the social integration of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Behavior Modification, 22(4), 502–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan, C., Bayen, E., Pradat-Diehl, P., Ghout, I., Darnoux, E., Azerad, S., … Azouvi, P. (2016). A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the Paris-TBI study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 59(2), 100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko, E., Lexell, J., & Soderberg, A. (2005). The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 37, 42–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinsella, G., Ford, B., & Moran, C. (1989). Survival of social relationships following head injury. International Disability Studies, 11, 9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2017). “I’ve never been a yes person”: Decision-making participation and self-conceptualization after severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(22), 2250–2260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozloff, R. (1987). Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, J., Marwitz, J., Seel, R., & Serio, C. (1996). Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 116–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, J., Marwitz, J., Walker, W., Sander, A., Sherer, M., & Bogner, J. (2003). Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18, 128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, J., Seel, R., & Marwitz, J. (1999). The neurobehavioral functioning inventory. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H., Cloutier, G., & Levert, J. (2008). Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury, 22, 535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack, W., Kayes, N., & Fadyl, J. (2010). Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 986–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marosszeky, N. E. V., Ryan, L., Shores, E. A., Batchelor, J., & Marosszeky, J. E. (1997). The PTA protocol: Guidelines for using the westmead posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) scale. Sydney: Wild & Wooley.
   Google Scholar
• McColl, M., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., & Davies, D. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12, 15–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44, 28–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealings, M., & Douglas, J. (2010). ‘School’s a big part of your life … ’: Adolescent Perspectives of Their School Participation Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Impairment, 11(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealings, M., Douglas, J., & Olver, J. (2012). Considering the student perspective in returning to school after TBI: A literature review. Brain Injury, 26, 1165–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealings, M., Douglas, J., & Olver, J. (2017). Beyond academic performance: Practice implications for working with students following traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(5), 441–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. J., Veitch, C., & Passey, M. (2014). Efficacy of leisure intervention groups in rehabilitation of people with an acquired brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(17), 1474–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muenchberger, H., Kendall, E., & Neal, R. (2008). Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: A dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury, 22, 979–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, J., & Kosciulek, J. (2014). Social interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(2), 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi, M. (1998). “Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 869–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, S., & Hilari, K. (2011). Why do people lose their friends after a stroke? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 524–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, S., Marshall, J., & Hilari, K. (2016). What factors predict who will have a strong social network following a stroke? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 772–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, S., Moss, B., Harrison, K., & Hilari, K. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: Associated factors and patterns of change. Clinical Rehabilitation, 30, 811–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. (1994). Friendship in older adulthood. In M. L. Hummert, J. M. Wiemann, & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 209–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K., & Chamberlain, K. (2000). Dimensions and discourses of meaning in life: Approaching meaning from qualitative perspectives. In G. T. Reker & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Exploring existential meaning: Optimising human development across the life span (pp. 75–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellet, M., Morin, C., & Lavoie, A. (2009). Volunteer work and psychological health following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24, 262–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S., & Herbert, C. (2016). Friendships and intimacy: Promoting the maintenance and development of relationships in residential neurorehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 38, 291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, J., & Stewart, J. (2002). Adults with acquired brain injury: Perceptions of their social world. Rehabilitation Nursing, 27(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Perdices, M., & Tate, R. L. (2009). Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 904–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C., & Hanks, R. (2006). Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World health Organization model of disability. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 889–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford, J., Draper, K., & Schönberger, M. (2008). Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, P., Gompertz, P., & Ebrahim, S. (1998). A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12(4), 338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. M., Rich, T. J., & Wise, E. K. (2016). Effectiveness of occupation- and activity-based interventions to improve everyday activities and social participation for people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, M., Douglas, J., & Ames, D. (2016). Spouses’ experience of living with a Partner diagnosed with a dementia: A synthesis of the qualitative research. International Psychogeriatrics, 28, 537–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, M., Douglas, J., & Ames, D. (2018). Facing the challenges of primary Progressive aphasia: The spousal perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(9), 2292–2312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England (PHE). (2018). Briefing document. First incidence of stroke: Estimates for England 2007–2016. London: PHE.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, C., Casassus, M., Rowlands, L., Pimm, S., & Flanagan, D. (2018). “Relating through sameness”: a qualitative study of friendship and social isolation in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28, 1161–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarre, S., Redlich, C., Tinker, A., Sadler, E., Bhalla, A., & McKevitt, C. (2014). A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: Lessons for the study of resilience. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 716–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorland, J., & Douglas, J. (2010). Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(4), 569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P., & Douglas, J. (2017). Psychosocial aspects of pragmatic disorders. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in clinical Pragmatics, series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11. Cham: Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-3-319-47487-8 (hardcover); 978-3-319-47489-2 (eBook), (617-649).
   Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1997). Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 11, 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow up study. Brain Injury, 12, 911–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1999). Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology, 13, 529–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman-Pare, D., Colantonio, A., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., & Vernich, L. (2001). Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen, M., Davis, L., Bogaards, J., Hudler Hall, T., Clark, A., Mazzei, D., … Caroselli, J. (2011). Making Connections After Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26, 4–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. (2009). Are We There Yet?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 287–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. ( Eds.) (2010). SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & Behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Broe, G., Cameron, I., Hodgkinson, A., & Soo, C. (2005). Pre-injury, injury and early post-injury predictors of long-term functional and psychosocial recovery after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 6, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Kennedy, M., Ponsford, J., Douglas, J., Velikonja, M., Bayley, M., & Stergiou-Kita, M. On behalf of the INCOG Expert Panel (2014). INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 338–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Lulham, J., Broe, G., Strettles, B., & Pfaff, A. (1989). Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: The results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52, 1128–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Wakim, D., & Genders, M. (2014). A systematic review of the Efficacy of community-based, leisure/social activity Programmes for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 15, 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. (2004). The potential unlimited programme: An outdoor experiential education and group work approach that facilitates adjustment to brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 1271–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., … Turkstra, L. (2014). INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umberson, D., & Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S54–S66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, P. (1987). Friendship networks and social support. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, C., Ponsford, J., Downing, M., & Carty, M. (2014). Frequency and quality of return to study following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29, 248–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar