An overview of outcome measures used in neuropsychological rehabilitation research on adults with acquired brain injury

References

• Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15–S20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech, P. (2015). The responsiveness of the different versions of the Hamilton depression scale. World Psychiatry, 14, 309–310. doi: 10.1002/wps.20248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech, P., Bille, J., Møller, S. B., Hellström, L. C., & Østergaard, S. D. (2014). Psychometric validation of the Hopkins symptom checklist (SCL-90) subscales for depression, anxiety, and interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens, S., van Heugten, C. M., & Verhey, F. (2009). The practical use of goal attainment scaling for people with acquired brain injury who receive cognitive rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(4), 310–320. doi: 10.1177/0269215508101744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016, June 1). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD000425.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine and Royal College of Physicians National Clinical Guidelines. (2003). p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. J., & Tyson, S. (2015). Screening for mood disorders after stroke: A systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility. Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 29–49. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozzino, D., Morberg, B. M., Siri, C., Pezzoli, G., & Bech, P. (2018). Evaluating psychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease by a clinimetric analysis of the Hopkins symptom checklist (SCL-90-R). Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 2(81), 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.024
   Google Scholar
• Casaletto, K. B., & Heaton, R. K. (2017). Neuropsychological assessment: Past and future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23, 778–790. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C. J., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., … Moy, C. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78(23), 1860–1867. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F.,  …  Morse, P. A. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596–1615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., … Catanese, J. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1681–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Langenbahn, D. M., Braden, C., Malec, J. F., Kalmar, K., Fraas, M., … Ashman, T. (2011). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Nair, R., Cogger, H., Worthington, E., & Lincoln, N. B. (2016, September 1). Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD002293. [Epub ahead of print] Review.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliot, F., & Parente, M. (2014). Efficacy of memory rehabilitation therapy: A meta-analysis of TBI and stroke cognitive rehabilitation literature. Brain Injury, 28(12), 1610–1616. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.934921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, R. C., Lai, J. S., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., … , Cella, D. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research., 21(3), 475–486. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtsen, G. J., van Heugten, C. M., Martina, J. D., & Geurts, A. C. H. (2010). Comprehensive rehabilitation programmes in the chronic phase after severe brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 97–110. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, B. (1991). Multidimensional properties of the general health questionnaire. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 26, 132–138. doi: 10.1007/BF00782952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M., & Ponsford, J. (2014). Goal attainment scaling in brain injury rehabilitation: Strengths, limitations and recommendations for future applications. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(5), 661–677. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.901228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregório, G. W., Brands, I., Stapert, S., Verhey, F. R., & van Heugten, C. M. (2014). Assessments of coping after acquired brain injury: A systematic review of instrument conceptualization, feasibility, and psychometric properties. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(3), E30–E42. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828f93db
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, R., Tennant, A., Biering-Sørensen, F., Grimby, G., Marincek, C., Phillips, S., … Thonnard, J. L. (2001). The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(6), 273–278. doi: 10.1080/165019701753236464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honan, C. A., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Ownsworth, T., Togher, L., Fleming, J., … Ponsford, J. (2017, July 2). Outcome instruments in moderate-to-severe adult traumatic brain injury: Recommendations for use in psychosocial research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1–21. [Epub ahead of print ].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Khan, S. R., Shankles, E. B., & Polissar, N. L. (2002). Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale, the Hamilton depression rating scale and the clinical global impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(6), 281–285. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200211000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, P., Campbell Burton, C. A., Holmes, J., Murray, J., Gillespie, D., Lightbody, C. E., … Lewis, S. R. (2017, May 23). Interventions for treating anxiety after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD008860.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenstrøm, E., Boysen, G., Christiansen, L. W., Hansen, B. R., & Nielson, P. W. (1991). Reliability of scandinavian neurological stroke scale. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 1, 103–107. doi: 10.1159/000108825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz-Cook, E., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Woods, R., Verhey, F., Chattat, R., De Vugt, M., … Orrell, M. (2008). A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging & Mental Health, 12(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1080/13607860801919850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polinder, S., Haagsma, J. A., Bonsel, G., Essink-Bot, M. L., Toet, H., & van Beeck, E. F. (2010). The measurement of long-term health-related quality of life after injury: Comparison of EQ-5D and the health utilities index. Injury Prevention, 16(3), 147–153. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.022418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polinder, S., Haagsma, J. A., van Klaveren, D., Steyerberg, E. W., & van Beeck, E. F. (2015). Health-related quality of life after TBI: A systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome. Population Health Metrics, 13, 4. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0037-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti-Otajärvi, E. M., & Hämäläinen, P. I. (2014, February 11). Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD009131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas, J., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Ackerson, T., Bernhardt, J., Davie, C., George, M. G., … Schwamm, L. H. (2016). An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke, 47, 180–186. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, S. M., Ponds, R. W., Verhey, F. R., & van Heugten, C. M. (2012). Psychometric properties and feasibility of instruments used to assess awareness of deficits after acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(6), 433–442. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182242f98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman, J. M., & Fasotti, L. (2017). Recovery cand treatment. In R. Kessles, P. Eling, R. Ponds, K. Spikman, & M. van Zandvoort (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 113–133). Amsterdam: Boom Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L. (2010). A compendium of tests, scales and questionnaires. Hove: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L. (2014). Measuring outcomes using the ICF with special reference to participation and environmental factors. In H. S. Levin, D. H. K. Shum, & R. C. K. Chan (Eds.), Undersatnding traumatic brain injury (pp. 163–189). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Godbee, K., & Sigmundsdottir, L. (2013). A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(4), 729–750. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., … de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerby, N., Andersen, J. H., Søndergaard, S., Østergaard, S. D., & Bech, P. (2017). A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of the 6-item version of the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D6). Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 86(3), 141–149. doi: 10.1159/000457131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Putten, J. J., Hobart, J. C., Freeman, J. A., & Thompson, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the barthel index and the functional independence measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 66(4), 480–484. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heugten, C. M. (2017). Outcome measures. In B. A. Wilson, J. Winegardner, C. M. van Heugten, & T. Ownsworth (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation. The international handbook (pp. 537–546). Oxford: Routledge Raylor & Francis group.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heugten, C., Walton, L., & Hentschel, U. (2015). Can we forget the mini-mental state examination? A systematic review of the validity of cognitive screening instruments within one month after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29(7), 694–704. doi: 10.1177/0269215514553012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, E. A., Whiteneck, G. G., Bogner, J., Bushnik, T., Cifu, D. X., Dikmen, S., … von Steinbuechel, N. (2010). Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(11), 1650–1660.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A. (1997). Cognitive rehabilitation: How it is and how it might be. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 487–496. doi: 10.1017/S1355617797004876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A. (2002). Cognitive rehabilitation in the 21st century. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair, 16(2), 207–210. doi: 10.1177/08839002016002002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar