Self-reported strategy generation and implementation in the multiple errands test: A qualitative description

References

• Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Knight, C., & Henman, C. (2003). Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703910046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre, M. M. (2009). Acquired brain injury and naturalistic strategy use: Analysis of strategies used during completion of the multiple errands test (Publication Number MR59276) [Master’s thesis, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/219966971?accountid=14723
   Google Scholar
• Antoniak, K., Clores, J., Jensen, D., Nalder, E., Rotenberg, S., & Dawson, D. R. (2019). Developing and validating a big-store multiple errands test. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bottari, C., & Dawson, D. R. (2011). Executive functions and real-world performance: How good are we at distinguishing people with acquired brain injury from healthy controls? OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(1), S61–S68. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20101108-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, C., Iliopoulos, G., Shun, P. L. W., & Dawson, D. R. (2014). The clinical reasoning that guides therapists in interpreting errors in real-world performance. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(6), E18–E30. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, C., Shun, P. L. W., Le Dorze, G., Gosselin, N., & Dawson, D. (2014). Self-generated strategic behavior in an ecological shopping task. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.008987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Forbes, C., Costello, A., Coates, L. M., Dawson, D. R., Anderson, N. D., Gilbert, S. J., Dumontheil, I., & Channon, S. (2006). The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617706060310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, S. P. (2016). Development and psychometric analysis of the multiple errands test home version (MET-home) in adults with stroke (Publication Number 10240921) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman’s University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/1862194450?pq-origsite=summon
   Google Scholar
• Burns, S. P., Dawson, D. R., Perea, J. D., Vas, A. K., Pickens, N. D., de la Plata, C. M., & Neville, M. (2020). Associations between self-generated strategy use and MET-home performance in adults with stroke. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(8), 1543–1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2019.1601112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, R. C. K., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2008). Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. J., Anderson, N. D., Nalder, E., Arshad, S., & Dawson, D. R. (2017). Reliability and construct validity of a revised Baycrest multiple errands test. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1117981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, S., Bonazzi, S., Laiacona, M., Masina, M., & Coralli, M. V. (2015). Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)-Italian version: Regression based norms and equivalent scores. Neurological Sciences, 36(2), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1921-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuberos-Urbano, G., Caracuel, A., Vilar-Lopez, R., Valls-Serrano, C., Bateman, A., & Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2013). Ecological validity of the multiple errands test using predictive models of dysexecutive problems in everyday life. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.776011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, M., Bragge, P., & Ponsford, J. (2019). Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: A survey of current practice in Australia. Brain Impairment, 20(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2018.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M., Ponsford, J., & Bennett, P. C. (2012). The application of goal management training to aspects of financial management in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(6), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2012.693455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberg, V. L., MacKenzie, D. E., & Merritt, B. K. (2018). Scoping review of the multiple errands test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(12), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberg, V. L., Mackenzie, D. E., & Versnel, J. (2019). Face validity of the youth multiple errands test (yMET) in the community: A focus group and pilot study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(4), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618813098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir, A., Katz, N., & Baum, C. M. (2009). Cognitive functional evaluation (CFE) process for individuals with suspected cognitive disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380570802455516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knight, C., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P. W. (2002). Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12(3), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010244000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, C., Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & McKenna, K. (2009). Management of patients with cognitive impairment after stroke: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(5), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00764.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Maeir, A., Krauss, S., & Katz, N. (2011). Ecological validity of the multiple errands test (MET) on discharge from neurorehabilitation hospital. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(1), S38–S46. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20101108-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen, S., Polatajko, H., Baum, C., Rios, J., Cirone, D., Doherty, M., & Wolf, T. (2015). Combined cognitive-strategy and task-specific training improve transfer to untrained activities in subacute stroke: An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314558602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. T., Edwards, D. F., & Giles, G. M. (2015). Performance-based testing in mild stroke: Identification of unmet opportunity for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(1), 6901360010p1–6901360010p5. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.011528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. T., Giles, G. M., Ryan, J. D., Baum, C. M., Dromerick, A. W., Polatajko, H. J., & Edwards, D. F. (2013). Multiple errands test-revised (MET-R): A performance-based measure of executive function in people with mild cerebrovascular accident. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(4), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.007880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalder, E. J., Clark, A. J., Anderson, N. D., & Dawson, D. R. (2017). Clinicians’ perceptions of the clinical utility of the multiple errands test for adults with neurological conditions. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1067628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description – The poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(52), https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Caoimh, R., Timmons, S., & Molloy, D. W. (2016). Screening for mild cognitive impairment: Comparison of “MCI specific” screening instruments. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 51(2), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski, M. V., Anheluk, M., Bartzen, M. P., & Zola, J. (2016). Effectiveness of interventions to address cognitive impairments and improve occupational performance after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(3), 7003180050p1–7003180050p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.020776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti, H. C., Lacritz, L. H., Cullum, C. M., & Weiner, M. F. (2011). Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology, 77(13), 1272–1275. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230208a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotenberg, S., Ruthralingam, M., Hnatiw, B., Neufeld, K., Yuzwa, K. E., Arbel, I., & Dawson, D. R. (2020). Measurement properties of the multiple errands test: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 101(9), 1628–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114(2), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.2.727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, E. R., Dawson, D. R., Butters, M. A., Grattan, E. S., Juengst, S. B., Whyte, E. M., Begley, A., Holm, M. B., & Becker, J. T. (2015). Strategy training shows promise for addressing disability in the first 6 months after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(7), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314562113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. (2018). Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2017. https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management
   Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Kennedy, M., Ponsford, J., Douglas, J., Velikonja, D., Bayley, M., & Stergiou-Kita, M. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part III: Executive function and self-awareness. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toglia, J. P., Rodger, S. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2012). Anatomy of cognitive strategies: A therapist’s primer for enabling occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.4.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar