519
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A practitioner's guide to conducting and analysing embedded randomized single-case experimental designs

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 613-645 | Received 24 Aug 2021, Accepted 25 Jan 2022, Published online: 18 Feb 2022

References

  • Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effetcs of two treatments in a single-subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
  • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Pearson.
  • Boyle, M. A., Keenan, G., Forck, K. L., & Curtis, K. S. (2019). Treatment of elopement without blocking with a child with autism. Behavior Modification, 43(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517740871
  • Brogan, K. M., Falligant, M., & Rapp, J. T. (2017). Interdependent group contingencies decrease adolescents’ disruptive behaviors during group therapy: A practitioner's demonstration. Behavior Modification, 41(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420950027
  • Bulté, I., & Onghena, P. (2008). An R package for single-case randomization tests. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.467
  • Bulté, I., & Onghena, P. (2009). Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs: An extension of the SCRT-R package. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.477
  • Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis. New directions for Psychology and Education (pp. 187–212). Erlbaum.
  • Busse, R. T., McGill, R. J., & Kennedy, K. S. (2015). Methods for assessing single-case school-based intervention outcomes. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(3), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0025-7
  • Cassiello-Robbins, C., Sauer-Zavala, S., Brody, L. R., & Barlow, D. H. (2020). Exploring the effects of mindfulness and countering emotional behaviors modules from the unified protocol on dysregulated anger in the context of emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 51(6), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.12.007
  • Connell, P. J., & Thompson, C. K. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: Using flexibility to design or modify experiments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5103.214
  • Coon, J. C., & Rapp, J. T. (2018). Application of multiple baseline designs in behavior analytic research: Evidence for the influence of new guidelines. Behavarioal Interventions, 32(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1510
  • Craig, A. R., & Fisher, W. W. (2019). Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior analytic data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 111(2), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.500
  • De, T. K., Michiels, B., Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (2020). Handling missing data in randomization tests for single-case experiments: A simulation study. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01320-3
  • Delano, M. E. (2007). Improving written language performance of adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.50-06
  • Dowdy, A., Peltier, C., Tincani, M., Schneider, W. J., Hantula, D. A., & Travers, J. C. (2021). Meta-analyses and effect sizes in applied behavior analysis: A review and discussion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.862
  • Edgington, E. S. (1967). Statistical inference from N = 1 experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1967.10544864
  • Edgington, E. S. (1975). Randomization tests for one-subject operant experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 90(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9923926
  • Edgington, E. S. (1980). Validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986005003235
  • Edgington, E. S. (1996). Randomized single-subject experimental designs. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34(7), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(96)00012-5
  • Ferron, J., & Jones, P. K. (2006). Tests for the visual analysis of response-guided multiple-baseline data. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.1.66-81
  • Ferron, J., Joo, S.-H., & Levin, J. R. (2017). A Monte Carlo evaluation evaluation of masked visual analysis in response-guided versus fixed-criteria multiple-baseline data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.410
  • Ferron, J., Rohrer, L. L., & Levin, J. R. (2019). Randomization procedures for changing criterion designs. Behavior Modification. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519847627
  • Ferron, J. M., Moeyaert, M., Van den Noortgate, W., & Beretvas, S. N. (2014). Estimating causal effects from multiple-baseline studies: Implications for design and analysis. Psychological Methods, 19(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037038
  • Ferron, J., & Ware, W., (1995). Analyzing single-case data: The power of randomization tests. The Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943820
  • Gedo, P. M. (1999). Single case studies in psychotherapy research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 16(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.16.2.274
  • Gerow, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Davis, T. N., Hodges, A., & Feind, A. (2020). A comparison of demand fading and a dense schedule of reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00403-z
  • Hammond, D., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs: 1983–2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 187–202.
  • Hartmann, D. P., & Hall, R. V. (1976). The changing criterion design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-527
  • Hathaway, K. L., Schieltz, K. M., & Detrick, J. (2021). Evaluating the effects of instructional prompts and strategic incremental rehearsal on the letter identification mastery of two typically developing kindergarteners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00456-5
  • Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2014). Randomization tests for single-case experiments: State of the art, state of the science, and state of the application. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.10.002
  • Horner, R. J., & Odom, S. L. (2014). Constructing single-case research designs: Logic and options. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methdological and statistical advances (pp. 27–51). American Psychological Association.
  • Imam, A. A. (2021). Historically recontextualizing Sidman's Tactics: How behavior analysis avoided psychology's methodlogical Ouroboros. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.661
  • Jacobs, K. W. (2019). Replicability and randomization test logic in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 111(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.501
  • Janosky, J. E., Leininger, S. L., Hoerger, M. O., & Libkuman, T. M. (2009). Single subject designs in biomedicine. Springer.
  • Johnson, A. H., & Cook, B. G. (2019). Preregistration in single-case design research. Exceptional Children, 86(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0014402919868529
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2020). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2021). Single-case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.638
  • Kennedy, C. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson.
  • Klein, L. A., Houlihan, D., Vincent, J. L., & Panahon, C. J. (2017). Best practices in utilizing the changing criterion design. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0036-x
  • Koehler, M. J., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Regulated randomization: A potentially sharper analytical tool for the multiple baseline design. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.206
  • Krasny-Pacini, A., & Evans, J. (2018). Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 61(3), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdf
  • Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736
  • Lancioni, G. E., Desideri, L., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & O'Reilly, M. H. (2021). A commentary on standards for single-case experimental studies. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1870420
  • Lane, J. D., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
  • Lane, J. D., Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2017). Single-case experimental design: Current standards and applications in occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 7102300010p1–7102300010p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.022210
  • Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Pradhan, S., & Huitema, B. E. (2019). An overview of scientific reproducibility: Consideration of relevant issues for behavior science/analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00193-3
  • Ledford, J. R. (2018). No randomization? No problem: Experimental control and assignment in single case research. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017723110
  • Ledford, J. R., Barton, E. E., Severini, K. E., & Zimmerman, K. N. (2019). A primer on single-case research designs: Contemporary use and analysis. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35
  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018a). Combination and other designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology – applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed, pp. 335–364). Routledge.
  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018b). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2014). Improved randomization tests for a class of single-case intervention designs. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 13(2), 2–52. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1414814460
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2017). Additional comparisons of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple baseline designs: Alternative effect types. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.02.003
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2018). Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(5), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2016.1197708
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2019a). An improved two independent-samples randomization test for single-case AB-type intervention designs: A 20-year journey. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 18(1), eP3311. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1556670480
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2021). Investigation of single-case multiple-baseline randomization tests of trend and variability. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09549-7
  • Levin, J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2012). Nonparametric statistical tests for single-case systematic and randomized ABAB … AB and alternating treatment intervention designs: New developments, new directions. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), 599–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.05.001
  • Levin, J. R., Kratochwill, T. R., & Ferron, J. M. (2019b). Randomization procedures in single-case intervention research contexts: (Some of) “the rest of the story”. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.558
  • Levin, J. R., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Generalized single-case randomization tests: Flexible analyses for a variety of situations. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(1), 59–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088998
  • Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C., Jakielski, K., Kovacs, N., Stoeckel, R., Vradelis, H., & Welsh, M. (2019). Bang for your buck: A single-case experimental design study of practice amount and distribution in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9), 3160–3182. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0212
  • Maggin, D. M., Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2018). Using single-case research designs to examine the effects of interventions in special education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12184
  • Manolov, R., Moeyaert, M., & Fingerhut, J. (2021). A priori justification for effect measures in single-case experimental designs. Perspectives on Behavior Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00282-2
  • Manolov, R., & Onghena, P. (2018). Analyzing data from single-case alternating treatments designs. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000133
  • Manolov, R., Solanas, A., & Sierra, V. (2020). Changing criterion designs: Integrating methodological and data analysis recommendations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(2), 235–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1553838
  • Matson, J. L., Turygin, N. C., Beighley, J. S., & Matson, M. L. (2012). Status of single-case research designs for evidence-based practice. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.12.008
  • Michiels, B., & Onghena, P. (2019). Randomized single-case AB phase designs: Prospects and pitfalls. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2454–2476. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1084-x
  • Moeyaert, M., Akhmedjanova, D., Ferron, J. M., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2020). Effect size estimation for combined single-case experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 14(1-2), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2020.1747146
  • Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Ferron, J., Beretvas, S. N., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2014). The influence of the design matrix on treatment effect estimates in the quantitative analyses of single-case experimental designs research. Behavior Modification, 38(5), 665–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514535243
  • Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. (2009). Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. SAGE.
  • Morley, S. (2018). Single-case methods in clinical psychology: A practical guide. Routledge.
  • Muharib, R., Alzrayer, N. M., Wood, C. L., & Voggt, A. P. (2019). Backward chaining and speech-output technologies to enhance functional communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1704433
  • Nikles, J., & Mitchell, G. (2015). The essential guide of N-of-1 trials in health. Springer.
  • Onghena, P. (1992). Randomization tests for extensions and variations of ABAB single-case experimental designs: A rejoinder. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 153–171.
  • Onghena, P., & Edgington, E. S. (1994). Randomization tests for restricted alternating treatments designs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(7), 783–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90036-1
  • Onghena, P., & Edgington, E. S. (2005). Customization of pain treatments: Single-case design and analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 21(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200501000-00007
  • Onghena, P., Tanious, R., De, T. K., & Michiels, B. (2019). Randomization tests for changing criterion designs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 117, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.005
  • Peng, C. Y., & Chen, L. T. (2021). Assessing intervention effects in the presence of missing scores. Education Sciences, 11(2), article 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020076
  • Perdices, M., Tate, R. L., & Rosenkoetter, U. (2019). An algorithm to evaluate methodological rigor and risk of bias in single-case studies. Behavior Modification. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519863035
  • Perone, M. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better. The Behavior Analyst, 22(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391988
  • Plavnick, J. B., & Ferreri, S. J. (2013). Single-case experimental designs in educational research: A methodology for causal analyses in teaching and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9230-6
  • Porcino, A. J., Shamseer, L., Chan, A.-W., Kravitz, R. L., Orkin, A. , Punja, S., Ravaud, P., Schmid, C. H., & Vohra, S. (2020). SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist. BMJ, Article 368:m122. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m122
  • Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ferron, J. M. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis of single-case designs. In J. M. Kaufmann, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 168–185). Routledge.
  • Radley, K. C., Dart, E. H., & O'Handley, R. D. (2016). The quiet classroom game: A class-wide intervention to increase academic engagement and reduce disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 45(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-1.93-108
  • Riley-Tillman, T. C., Burns, M. K., & Kilgus, S. P. (2020). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case design for measuring response to intervention (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Rvachew, S., & Matthews, T. (2017). Demonstrating treatment efficacy using the single subject randomization design: A tutorial and demonstration. Journal of Communication Disorders, 67, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.04.003
  • Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.005
  • Shadish, W. R., Kyse, E. N., & Rindskopf, D. M. (2013). Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: New applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032964
  • Shadish, W. R., & Sullivan, K. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y
  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0956797611417632
  • Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 510–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029312
  • Soto, P. L. (2020). Single-case experimental designs for behavioral neuroscience. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 114(3), 447-467.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.633.
  • Spielberger, C. D. (1999). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: STAXI-2. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
  • Swan, D. M., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Beretvas, S. N. (2020). The impact of response-guided designs on count outcomes in single-case experimental design baselines. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 14(1-2), 82–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2020.1739048
  • Tang, J., & Landes, R. D. (2020). Some t-tests for N-of-1 trials with serial correlation. PloS One, 15(2), e0228077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228077
  • Tanious, R., De, T. K., Michiels, B., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2020). Assessing consistency in single-case A-B-A-B phase designs. Behavior Modification, 44(4), 518–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519837726
  • Tanious, R., De, T. K., & Onghena, P. (2019). A multiple randomization testing procedure for level, trend, variability, overlap, immediacy, and consistency in single-case phase designs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 119, article 103414. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103414
  • Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (2019). Randomized single-case experimental designs in healthcare research: What, why, and how? Healthcare, 7(4), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040143
  • Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (2021). A systematic review of applied single-case research published between 2016 and 2018: Study designs, randomization, data aspects, and data analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01502-4
  • Tanious, R., & Onghena, P. (in press). Applied hybrid single-case experiments published between 2016 and 2020: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221077910
  • Tate, R. L., & Perdices, M. (2019). Single-case experimental designs for clinical research and neurorehabilitation settings: Planning, conduct, analysis, and reporting. Routledge.
  • Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R., Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T. R., McDonald, S., Sampson, M., Shamseer, L., Togher, L., Albin, R., Backman, C., Douglas, J., Evans, J. J., Gast, D. L., Manolov, R., Mitchell, G., Nickels, L. (2016a). The Single-Case Reporting guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000026
  • Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W. R., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., … Wilson, B. (2016b). The Single-Case Reporting guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. Aphasiology, 30(7), 862–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1178022
  • Tate, R. L., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Sigmundsdottir, L., Doubleday, J., Togher, L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M. (2015). The risk of bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale: An expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports. John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation research.
  • Wampold, B. E., & Worsham, N. L. (1986). Randomization tests for multiple baseline designs. Behavioral Assessment, 8(2), 135–143.
  • What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). Standards Handbook, version 4.1. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/WWC-Standards-Handbook-v4-1-508.pdf
  • Wood, A. W., Dorais, S., Gutierrez, D., Moore, C. M., & Schmidt, M. K. (2021). Advancing the counseling profession through contemporary quantitative approaches. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12363
  • Wright, R. E., McMahon, D. D., Cihak, D. F., & Hirschfelder, K. (2020). Smartwatch executive function supports students with ID and ASD. Journal of Special Education Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0162643420950027
  • Zuidersma, M., Riese, H., Snippe, E., Booij, S. H., Wichers, M., & Bos, E. H. (2020). Single-subject research in psychiatry: Facts and fictions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.539777

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.