The quiet period has something to say

References

• Adams, B, 2003. Does timing matter? A study of analyst coverage of initial public offerings. 2003, Working Paper, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, F, and Faulhaber, G, 1989. Signaling by underpricing in the IPO market, Journal of Financial Economics 23 (1989), pp. 303–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B, Lehavy, R, McNichols, M, and Trueman, B, 2001. Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst ratings and stock returns, Journal of Finance 56 (2001), pp. 531–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B, Lehavy, R, and Trueman, B, 2010. Ratings changes, ratings levels, and the predictive value of analysts’ recommendations, Financial Management 39 (2010), pp. 533–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B, and Lyon, J, 1997. Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: the empirical power and specification of test statistics, Journal of Financial Economics 43 (1997), pp. 341–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boni, L, 2005. Analyzing the analysts after the global settlement. 2005, Working Paper, University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D, 2007. Clarke, J. and Cooney, J. (2007), Do analysts curry favor with issuing firms?, Working Paper, Clemson University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D, Jordan, B, and Ritter, J, 2003. The quiet period goes out with a bang, Journal of Finance 58 (2003), pp. 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D, Jordan, B, and Ritter, J, 2008. Analyst behavior following IPOs: the ‘bubble period’ evidence, Review of Financial Studies 21 (2008), pp. 101–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D, Jordan, B, Ritter, J, and Wolf, J, 2004. The IPO quiet period revisited, Journal of Investment Management 2 (2004), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• C. Brakman, Condon, N., Heine, J., Munk, J. and Scarlett, J. (2003) Ten of Nation's Top Investment Firms Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Conflicts of Interest Between Research and Investment Banking. Available at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003-54.htm (accessed 30 June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• C. Brakman, Nester, J., Perone, H., Webster, B. and Wong, S. (2004) Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Conflicts of Interest Between Research and Investment Banking. Available at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-120.htm (accessed 28 June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R, and Strader, T, 2009. The market versus the analyst: biases and predictive ability, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49 (2009), pp. 398–416.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y, and Chan, C, 2008. Financial analysts’ stock recommendation revisions and stock price changes, Applied Financial Economics 18 (2008), pp. 309–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, M, 2007. Do affiliated analysts mean what they say?, Financial Management 36 (2007), pp. 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, M, and Denis, D, 2004. Do initial public offering firms purchase analyst coverage with underpricing?, Journal of Finance 59 (2004), pp. 2871–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, M, 1998. IPO profit forecasts and their role in signalling firm value and explaining post-listing returns, Applied Financial Economics 8 (1998), pp. 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, Y, 2010. Lu, H. and Wong, M. (2010), Conflict of interest reforms and brain drain in investment banks, Working Paper, University of Toronto and City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnett, N, 2010. The value relevance of earnings forecast disclosures: an investigation of forecast attributes and signalling in the Australian IPO context, Applied Financial Economics 20 (2010), pp. 1819–28.
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, M, Lach, P, and White, L, 2008. The quiet period is making noise again, Applied Financial Economics 18 (2008), pp. 1363–78.
   Google Scholar
• Iskoz, S, 2003. Bias in underwriter analyst ratings: does it matter?. 2003, Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kadan, O, Madureira, L, Wang, R, and Zach, T, 2009. Conflicts of interest and stock ratings: the effects of the global settlement and related regulations, Review of Financial Studies 22 (2009), pp. 4189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T, 2001. Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias, Journal of Finance 56 (2001), pp. 369–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H, and McNichols, M, 1998. Underwriting relationships and analyst's earning forecasts and investment recommendations, Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (1998), pp. 101–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungqvist, A, Malloy, C, and Marston, F, 2009. Rewriting history, Journal of Finance 64 (2009), pp. 1935–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U, and Shanthikumar, D, 2007. Are small investors naïve?, Journal of Financial Economics 85 (2007), pp. 457–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNichols, M, 2006. O’Brienk P. and Pamukcu O. (2006), That ship has sailed: unaffiliated analysts’ recommendation performance for IPO firms, Working Paper, Stanford University and University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Michaely, R, and Womack, K, 1999. Conflict of interest and the creditability of underwriter analyst recommendations, Review of Financial Studies 12 (1999), pp. 653–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, J, 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 46 (1991), pp. 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickel, S, 1995. The anatomy of the performance of buy and sell ratings, Financial Analysts Journal 51 (1995), pp. 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Whiddon, R, 1999. Cover me: new issues and the importance of analyst coverage. 1999, IPO Reporter, Released: 13 September 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, K, 1996. Do brokerage analysts’ ratings have investment value?, Journal of Finance 51 (1996), pp. 137–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar