Towards more consistent and effective food control: learning from the views of food business operators

References

• Baş M, Ersun AŞ, Kıvanç G. 2006. The evaluation of food hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers’ in food businesses in Turkey. Food Control. 17:317–322. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz U, Run G, Kool JL, Fielding J, Mascola L. 2002. A risk-based restaurant inspection system in Los Angeles County. J Food Prot. 65:367–372. doi:10.4315/0362-028X-65.2.367. 10.4315/0362-028X-65.2.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley JA. 2015. Food safety regulation and small processing: A case study of interactions between processors and inspectors. Food Policy. 51:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton DA, Griffith CJ, Price P, Peters AC. 2002. Food handlers’ beliefs and self-reported practices. Int J Environ Health Res. 12:25–39. doi:10.1080/09603120120110031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cunha DT, De Rosso VV, Stedefeldt E. 2016. Should weights and risk categories be used for inspection scores to evaluate food safety in restaurants? J Food Prot. 79:501–506. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cunha DT, De Freitas Saccol AL, Tondo EC, De Oliveira AB, Ginani VC, Araújo CV, Lima TAS, De Castro AKF, Stedefeldt E. 2016. Inspection score and grading system for food services in Brazil: the results of a food safety strategy to reduce the risk of foodborne diseases during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Front Microbiol. 7:614. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies B, Brough M, Johnstone E. 2014. Food safety: maximising impact by understanding the food business context. Sydney: Australian Centre for Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Djekic I, Smigic N, Kalogianni EP, Rocha A, Zamioudi L, Pacheco R. 2014. Food hygiene practices in different food establishments. Food Control. 39:34–40. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DVFA] Danish Veterinary and Food Administration. 2017. Facts – the Danish veterinary and food administration. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 15]; Available from: https://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/english/SiteCollectionDocuments/Ledelsessekretariatet/Fact-Book-DVFA-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2015. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Apr 12]; Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/zoonoses-trends-sources-EU-summary-report-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. European Commission recommendation 2003/361/EC on the definition of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises. Off J Eur Union Brussels: Eur Commission L. 124:36–41.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 2005. The European code of good administrative behaviour. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2004. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Off J Eur Union Brussels: Eur Commission L. 139:55–205.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2004. Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules. Off J Eur Union Brussels: Eur Commission L. 165:1–141.
   Google Scholar
• Evira. 2013. Oiva brings consumers to the door of your company. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 5]; Available from: https://www.evira.fi/globalassets/tietoa-evirasta/julkaisut/esitteet/elintarvikkeet/oiva_esite_uk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evira. 2015. Approved establishments. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 3]; Available from: http://www.evira.fi/portal/fi/elintarvikkeet/valmistus+ja+myynti/elintarvikehuoneistot+/hyvaksytyt+laitokset+/laitokset/. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Evira. 2016a. Elintarviketurvallisuusviraston määräys elintarvikevalvontaviranomaisen ilmoitus- ja tiedonantovelvollisuuden toteuttamistavasta ja valvontatietojen julkistaminen [The finnish food safety authority Evira’s order on obligation of the control authority to notify and provide information and publishing of the inspection results]. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 15]; Available from: https://www.evira.fi/globalassets/tietoa-evirasta/asiointi/maarayskokoelma/elintarviketurvallisuusviraston-maarays-elintarvikevalvontaviranomaisen-ilmoitus–ja-tiedonantovelvollisuuden-toteuttamistavasta-ja-valvontatietojen-julkistaminen.pdf. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Evira. 2016b. Raportti Suomen elintarvikeketjun monivuotisen kansallisen valvontasuunnitelman 2014 - 2018 toteutumisesta vuonna 2015. [The annual report 2015 on the control of the food chain of Finland]. Evira/1454/0411/2016. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 8]; Available from: https://www.evira.fi/globalassets/tietoa-evirasta/esittely/toiminta/valvonta/arviointi–ja-raportit/fi-mancp-report-2015.pdf. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Fairman R, Yapp C. 2005. Enforced self‐regulation, prescription, and conceptions of compliance within small businesses: the impact of enforcement. Law Policy. 27:491–519. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00209.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding LM, Ellis L, Beveridge C, Peters AC. 2005. An evaluation of HACCP implementation status in UK small and medium enterprises in food manufacturing. Int J Environ Health Res. 15:117–126. doi:10.1080/09603120500061583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency. 2017. Food hygiene rating schemes. [Internet] [cited 2017 Feb 10]; Available from: https://www.food.gov.uk/business-industry/hygieneratings
   Google Scholar
• Gould LH, Mungai EA, Johnson SD, Richardson LTC, Williams IT, Griffin PM, Cole DJ, Hall AJ. 2013. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks – United States, 2009–2010. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 62:41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RM, Kane K. 2014. The effective enforcement of HACCP based food safety management systems in the UK. Food Control. 37:257–262. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith CJ, Livesey KM, Clayton D. 2010. The assessment of food safety culture. British Food J. 112:439–456.10.1108/00070701011034448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton P. 2004. Reducing administrative burdens: effective inspection and enforcement. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Ho DE. 2012. Fudging the nudge: information disclosure and restaurant grading. Yale LJ. 122:574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho DE. 2017. Does peer review work? an experiment of experimentalism. Stanford Law Rev. 69:1–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter BM, Amodu T. 2009. Risk regulation and compliance: food safety in the UK. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasinghe-Mudalige U, Henson S. 2007. Identifying economic incentives for Canadian red meat and poultry processing enterprises to adopt enhanced food safety controls. Food Control. 18:1363–1371. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianu C, Chiş C. 2012. Study on the hygiene knowledge of food handlers working in small and medium-sized companies in western Romania. Food Control. 26:151–156. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Leslie P. 2003. The effect of information on product quality: evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Q J Econ. 118(2):409–451.10.1162/003355303321675428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TF, Pavlin BI, LaFleur BJ, Ingram LA, Schaffner W. 2004. Restaurant inspection scores and foodborne disease. Emerging Infect Dis. 10:688–692. doi:10.3201/eid1004.030343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman AD. 2012. Food safety practices and knowledge among Turkish dairy businesses in different capacities. Food Control. 26:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldgaard KJ, Stormly ML, Leisner JJ. 2010. Relation between microbial levels of ready-to-eat foods and the monitoring of compliance with HACCP-based own control programs in small Danish food outlets. Food Control. 21:1453–1457. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läikkö-Roto T, Nevas M. 2014a. Auditing local official food control: perceptions of auditors and auditees. Food Control. 37:135–140. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läikkö-Roto T, Nevas M. 2014. Restaurant business operators’ knowledge of food hygiene and their attitudes toward official food control affect the hygiene in their restaurants. Food Control. 43:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.02.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läikkö-Roto T, Mäkelä S, Lundén J, Heikkilä J, Nevas M. 2015. Consistency in inspection processes of food control officials and efficacy of official controls in restaurants in Finland. Food Control. 57:341–350. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JE, Nelson DC, Almanza BA. 2012. Health inspection reports as predictors of specific training needs. Int J Hosp Manage. 31:522–528. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Woolf C, Bain J, Fell D. 2015. Consistency in the delivery of official food safety controls: the role of organisational-level factors. A report for the Food Standards Agency. [Internet] [cited 2017 Feb 9]; Available from: https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/consistency-regulatory-work-research4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leisner JJ, Lund TB, Frandsen EA, Andersen NBE, Fredslund L, Nguyen VP, Kristiansen T. 2014. What consumers expect from food control and what they get – A case study of the microbial quality of sushi bars in Denmark. Food Control. 45:76–80. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepistö O, Hänninen M-L. 2011. Effects of legal aspects on the use of compulsory procedures in environmental health and food control. J Environ Health Res. 11:127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mascini P, Wijk EV. 2009. Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and consumer product safety authority: an empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regul Gov. 3:27–47. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01047.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May PJ, Wood RS. 2003. At the regulatory front lines: inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. J Public Adm Res Theory. 13:117–139. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2011. Finnish food act 23/2006, amendment 352/2011. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Apr 26]; Available from: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2006/en20060023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nevas M, Kalenius S, Lundén J. 2013. Significance of official food control in food safety: food business operators’ perceptions. Food Control. 31:59–64. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.09.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York City. 2017. Restaurant letter grading. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 10]; Available from: http://www1.nyc.gov/nyc-resources/service/2363/restaurant-letter-grading
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. 2004. “Any other comments?” open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 4:1. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-25.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264208117-en.
   Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland. 2016. Structural business and financial statement statistics. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 17]; Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/yrti/tau_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Pautz MC. 2009. Trust between regulators and the regulated: a case study of environmental inspectors and facility personnel in Virginia. Polit Policy. 37:1047–1072.10.1111/polp.2009.37.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Pautz MC. 2010. Front-line regulators and their approach to environmental regulation in Southwest Ohio. Rev Policy Res. 27:761–780.10.1111/ropr.2010.27.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell DA, Jacob CJ, Chapman BJ. 2011. Enhancing food safety culture to reduce rates of foodborne illness. Food Control. 22:817–822. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorie M, Rinfret S, Pautz M. 2015. The thin green line: examining environmental regulation and environmental offending from multiple perspectives. Int J Law Crime Justice. 43:586–608. doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serapiglia T, Kennedy E, Thompson S, De Burger R. 2007. Association of food premises inspection and disclosure program with retail-acquired foodborne illness and operator noncompliance in Toronto. J Environ Health. 70:54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahid NSM, Whisson J. 2012. Effectiveness of the tees valley food hygiene award scheme towards food business operators and consumers in the Middleborough District. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 49:368–380. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.035.
   Google Scholar
• Stadlmüller L, Matt M, Stüger HP, Komericki-Strimitzer T, Jebousek K, Luttenfeldner M, Fuchs K. 2017. An operational hygiene inspection scoring system for Austrian high-risk companies producing food of animal origin. Food Control. 77:121–130. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tähkäpää S, Maijala R, Hörman A, Poutiainen-Lindfors U, Korkeala H. 2008. Reasons behind inadequate local food control resources. Food Control. 19:403–411. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tähkäpää S, Kaario N, Maijala R, Korkeala H, Tulokas A, Lunden J. 2009. Problems for meat and fish business operators in implementing food law in Finland. Arch Lebensmittelhyg. 60:172–178. doi:10.2376/0003-925X-60-172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S, de Burger R, Kadri O. 2005. The Toronto food inspection and disclosure system: a case study. Brit Food J. 107:140–149. doi:10.1108/00070700510586461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violaris Y, Bridges O, Bridges J. 2008. Small businesses – big risks: current status and future direction of HACCP in cyprus. Food Control. 19:439–448. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker E, Pritchard C, Forsythe S. 2003a. Hazard analysis critical control point and prerequisite programme implementation in small and medium size food businesses. Food Control. 14:169–174. doi:10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00061-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker E, Pritchard C, Forsythe S. 2003b. Food handlers’ hygiene knowledge in small food businesses. Food Control. 14:339–343. doi:10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00101-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2013. Advancing food safety initiatives: strategic plan for food safety including foodborne zoonoses 2013–2022. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 21]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/101542/1/9789241506281_eng.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A, Ball B, Fajumo A. 2011. Effective implementation of food safety initiatives: managers’, food safety coordinators’ and production workers’ perspectives. Food Control. 22:27–33. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worsfold D, Worsfold PM. 2007. Evaluating food hygiene inspection schemes: ‘scores on doors’ in the UK. Int J Consum Stud. 31:582–588. 0.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00612.x
   Google Scholar
• Yapp C, Fairman R. 2006. Factors affecting food safety compliance within small and medium-sized enterprises: implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control. 17:42–51. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar