188
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Human-biomonitoring and individual soil measurements for children and mothers in an area with recently detected mercury-contaminations and public health concerns: a cross-sectional study

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 391-406 | Received 13 Apr 2018, Accepted 17 May 2018, Published online: 02 Jul 2018

References

  • Awata H, Linder S, Mitchell LE, Delclos GL. 2016a. Association of dietary intake and biomarker levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury among Asian populations in the U.S.: NHANES 2011–2012. Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar; 125(3): 314–323.
  • Awata H, Linder S, Mitchell LE, Delclos GL. 2016b. Biomarker levels of toxic metals among Asian populations in the U.S.: NHANES 2011–2012. Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar; 125(3):306-313.
  • BAG. 2012. EU Pilotstudie DEMOCOPHES zur Schadstoffbelastung. Berne (Switzerland): Bundesamt für Gesundheit.
  • Bailey EA, Gray JE, Theodorakos PM. 2002. Mercury in vegetation and soils at abandoned mercury mines in southwestern Alaska, USA. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis. 2(3):275–285.
  • Biester H, Müller G, Schöler HF. 2002. Binding and mobility of mercury in soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants. Sci Total Environ. 284(1–3):191–203.
  • Bland M. 2015. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Fourth Edition ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 141.
  • Bose-O’Reilly S, McCarty KM, Steckling N, Lettmeier B. 2010. Mercury exposure and children’s health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 40(8):186–215.
  • Boszke L, Kowalski A, Astel A, Barański A, Gworek B, Siepak J. 2008. Mercury mobility and bioavailability in soil from contaminated area [journal article]. Environ Geol. 55(5):1075–1087.
  • Castaño A, Cutanda F, Esteban M, Pärt P, Navarro C, Gómez S, Rosado M, López A, López E, Exley K, et al. 2015. Fish consumption patterns and hair mercury levels in children and their mothers in 17 EU countries. Environ Res. 141:58–68.
  • CDC. 2015. Fourth report on human exposure to environmental chemicals, Updated Tables, (2015 Feb). Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/.
  • Clarkson TW, Magos L. 2006. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 36(8):609–662.
  • Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ. 2003. The toxicology of mercury–current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med. 349(18):1731–1737. eng.
  • Davis A, Bloom NS, Que Hee SS. 1997. The environmental geochemistry and bioaccessibility of mercury in soils and sediments: a review. Risk Analysis: Official Publication Society Risk Analysis. 17(5):557–569.
  • eng.EPA US. 2008. Child-specific exposure factors handbook (Final report) EPA/600/R-06/096F. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Ewers U, Boening D, Albrecht J, Radel R, Peter G, Uthoff T. 2004. Risk assessment of soil contamination in a residential area: the importance and role of human biological monitoring–a case report. Gesundheitswesen. 66(8–9):536–544. ger.
  • Fréry N, Saoudi A, Garnier R, Zeghnoun A, Falq G. 2010. Exposure of the French population to environmental pollutants –environmental components of the French national survey on nutrition and health. Saint-Maurice (Fra): Initial results.
  • Gebel T, Behmke C, Dunkelberg H. 1998. Influence of exposure to mercury, arsenic and antimony on body burden–a biomonitoring study. Zentralblatt Fur Hygiene Und Umweltmedizin = International Journal Hygiene Environmental Medicine. 201(1):103–120. ger.
  • Gray JE, Crock JG, Fey DL. 2002. Environmental geochemistry of abandoned mercury mines in West-Central Nevada, USA. Appl Geochemistry. 17(8):1069–1079.
  • Grömping U. 2006. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Softw. 17(1).
  • Higueras P, Oyarzun R, Biester H, Lillo J, Lorenzo S. 2003. A first insight into mercury distribution and speciation in soils from the Almadén mining district, Spain. J of Geochemical Exploration. 80(1):95–104.
  • Kingman A, Albertini T, Brown LJ. 1998. Mercury concentrations in urine and whole blood associated with amalgam exposure in a US military population. J Dent Res. 77(3):461–471. eng.
  • Kocman D, Horvat M, Kotnik J. 2004. Mercury fractionation in contaminated soils from the Idrija mercury mine region [10.1039/B403625E]. J Environ Monit. 6(8):696–703.
  • McDowell MA, Dillon CF, Osterloh J, Bolger PM, Pellizzari E, Fernando R, Montes De Oca R, Se S, Sinks T, Rl J, et al. 2004. Hair mercury levels in U.S. children and women of childbearing age: reference range data from NHANES 1999–2000. Environ Health Perspect. 112(11):1165–1171. eng.
  • HealthCanada. 2010. Report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada - Results of the Canadian Health Measures Survey Cycle 1 (2007–2009), Health Canada
  • Lindeman RH, Merenda PF, Gold RZ. 1980. Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview (IL): Scott Foresman & Co; p. 119ff.
  • Molina JA, Oyarzun R, Esbri JM, Higueras P. 2006. Mercury accumulation in soils and plants in the Almaden mining district, Spain: one of the most contaminated sites on Earth. Environ Geochem Health. 28(5):487–498. Eng.
  • R Core Team 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.
  • Reis AT, Rodrigues SM, Davidson CM, Pereira E, Duarte AC. 2010. Extractability and mobility of mercury from agricultural soils surrounding industrial and mining contaminated areas. Chemosphere. 81(11):1369–1377.
  • Safruk AM, Berger RG, Jackson BJ, Pinsent C, Hair AT, Sigal EA. 2015. The bioaccessibility of soil-based mercury as determined by physiological based extraction tests and human biomonitoring in children. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jun 15;518-519:545-53.
  • Schindler BK, Esteban M, Koch HM, Castano A, Koslitz S, Cañas A, Casteleyn L, Kolossa-Gehring M, Schwedler G, Schoeters G, et al. 2014. The European COPHES/DEMOCOPHES project: towards transnational comparability and reliability of human biomonitoring results. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 217(6):653–661.
  • Schoeters G, Colles A, Hond ED, Croes K, Vrijens J, Baeyens W, Nelen V, Mieroop EVD, Covaci A, Bruckers L et al. 2012. Chapter 2F The Flemish Environment and Health Study (FLEHS) - Second Survey (2007–2011): establishing reference values for biomarkers of exposure in the flemish population. biomarkers and human biomonitoring: volume 1. the royal society of chemistry. 135–165.
  • Schulz C, Conrad A, Becker K, Kolossa-Gehring M, Seiwert M, Seifert B. 2007. Twenty years of the German Environmental Survey (GerES): human biomonitoring–temporal and spatial (West Germany/East Germany) differences in population exposure. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 210:271–297.
  • Schulz C, Wilhelm M, Heudorf U, Kolossa-Gehring M. 2011. Update of the reference and HBM values derived by the German Human Biomonitoring Commission. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 215(1):26–35. eng.
  • Sikorski R, Juszkiewicz T, Paszkowski T, Szprengier-Juszkiewicz T. 1987. Women in dental surgeries: reproductive hazards in occupational exposure to metallic mercury. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 59(6):551–557. eng.
  • Sly PD, Pronczuk J. 2007. Guest editorial: susceptibility of children to pollutants. Paediatr Respir Rev. 8:273–274.
  • Umweltbundesamt, 2008. German Environmental Survey for Children 2003/06 - GerES IV, Human Biomonitoring Levels of selected substances in blood and urine of children in Germany. Umweltbundesamt.
  • UNEP. 2013. Global Mercury Assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, SwitzerlandWallis K. 2011. PCB und Quecksilberanalyse bei Fischen im Grossgrundkanal, Nordkanal und Milibach sowie im Teich Mangettes
  • Wallis K. 2011. Präsidium des Staatsrates. PCB und Quecksilberanalyse bei Fischen im Grossgrundkanal, Nordkanal und Milibach sowie im Teich Mangettes
  • Wallis K 2015a. Präsidium des Staatsrates. Quecksilberbelastungen Raum Visp - Niedergesteln Untersuchungen gehen weiter.
  • Wallis K 2015b. Thematische Gruppe “Gesundheitliche Auswirkungen”. Informationsblatt betreffend Quecksilbergehalte in Gemüse aus quecksilberbelasteten Parzellen.
  • Wallis K 2016. Alte Deponie Gamsenried Notwendigkeit einer umfassenden Detailuntersuchung.
  • WHO. 1996. World Health Organization. Biological Monitoring of Chemical Exposure in the Workplace - Guidelines Volume 1. Geneva 1996.
  • WHO. 2007. World Health Organization. Exposure to mercury: A major public health concern. Geneva.
  • WHO/INCHEM. 2003. World Health Organization & International Programme on Chemical Safety. Elemental mercury and inorganic mercury compounds: Human health aspects. Geneva.
  • WHO/UNEP. 2008. Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. Switzerland: Geneva.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.