How can plant-enriched natural environments benefit human health: a narrative review of relevant theories

References

• AdlI M, Labib SM. 2023. Demystifying normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for greenness exposure assessments and policy interventions in urban greening. Environ Res. 220:115155. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.115155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aerts R, Honnay O, Van Nieuwenhuyse A. 2018. Biodiversity and human health: mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces. Br Med Bull. 127(1):5–22. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An KW, Kim EI, Joen KS, Setsu T. 2004. Effects of forest stand density on human’s physiophychological changes. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ. 49(2):283–291. doi:10.5109/4588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli M, Barbieri G, Donelli D. 2019. Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) on levels of cortisol as a stress biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Biometeorol. 63(8):1117–1134. eng. doi:10.1007/s00484-019-01717-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli M, Donelli D, Barbieri G, Valussi M, Maggini V, Firenzuoli F. 2020. Forest volatile organic compounds and their effects on human health: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(18):6506. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Kolt GS. 2013. Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians. BMJ open. 3(8):e003094. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbiero G. 2021. Affective Ecology as development of biophilia hypothesis. Vis Sustain. 16:21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Berman MG, Kross E, Krpan KM, Askren MK, Burson A, Deldin PJ, Kaplan S, Sherdell L, Gotlib IH, Jonides J. 2012. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J Affect Disord. 140(3):300–305. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielinis E, Omelan A, Boiko S, Bielinis L. 2018. The restorative effect of staying in a broad-leaved forest on healthy young adults in winter and spring. Balt For. 24(2):218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Blum WEH, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger KM. 2019. Does Soil Contribute to the Human Gut Microbiome? Microorganisms. 7(9):287. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7090287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman GN, Olvera-Alvarez HA. 2022. Nature and health: perspectives and pathways. Ecopsychology. 14(3):133–136. doi:10.1089/eco.2022.29007.editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Browning MH, Mimnaugh KJ, CJ VR, Laurent HK, LaValle SM. 2020. Can simulated nature support mental health? comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors. Front Psychol. 10:2667. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C-C C, Cheng GJY, Nghiem TPL, Song XP, Oh RRY, Richards DR, Carrasco LR. 2020. Social media, nature, and life satisfaction: global evidence of the biophilia hypothesis. Sci Rep. 10(1):4125. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60902-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Nakagawa S. 2018. Nature's pathways on human health . International Handbook of Forest Therapy. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; pp. 12–31 .
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Wang R, Zhang X, Liu J, Wang D. 2021. Effects of different site conditions on the concentration of negative air ions in mountain forest based on an orthogonal experimental study. Sustainability. 13(21):12012. doi:10.3390/su132112012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi Y, Kim G, Park S, Kim E, Kim S. 2021. Prediction of natural volatile organic compounds emitted by bamboo groves in urban forests. Forests. 12(5):543. doi:10.3390/f12050543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi Y, Park S, Kim S, Kim E, Kim G. 2022. A model combining forest environment images and online microclimate data instead of on-site measurements to predict phytoncide emissions. Forests. 13(11):1895. doi:10.3390/f13111895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CS, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TF, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV. 2019. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1985. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality - ScienceDirect. J Res Pers. 19(2):109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis S, Kintsch W. 2007. Evaluating Theories. Critical Thinking in Psychology. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; pp. 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Dzhambov AM, Dimitrova DD. 2014. Urban green spaces′ effectiveness as a psychological buffer for the negative health impact of noise pollution: a systematic review. Noise Health. 16(70):157. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.134916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov AM, Lercher P, Browning M, Stoyanov D, Petrova N, Novakov S, Dimitrova DD. 2021. Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? Environ Res. 196:110420. eng. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzhambov AM, MHEM B, Markevych I, Hartig T, Lercher P. 2020. Analytical approaches to testing pathways linking greenspace to health: a scoping review of the empirical literature. Environ Res. 186:109613. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner LE, Sütterlin S, Calogiuri G. 2020. Proposing a framework for the restorative effects of nature through conditioning: conditioned restoration theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(18):6792. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escolà-Gascón Á, Houran J. 2021. Paradoxical effects of exposure to nature in “haunted” places: implications for stress reduction theory. Landsc Urban Plan. 214:104183. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber Taylor A, Kuo FE. 2009. Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. J Atten Disord. 12(5):402–409. doi:10.1177/1087054708323000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaekwad JS, Sal Moslehian A, Roös PB, Walker A. 2022. A meta-analysis of emotional evidence for the biophilia hypothesis and implications for biophilic design [systematic review]. Front Psychol. 13:13. English. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianfredi V, Buffoli M, Rebecchi A, Croci R, Oradini-Alacreu A, Stirparo G, Marino A, Odone A, Capolongo S, Signorelli C. 2021. Association between urban greenspace and health: a systematic review of literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(10):5137. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahn P, Tenngart Ivarsson C, Stigsdotter UK, Bengtsson I-L. 2010. Using affordances as a health-promoting tool in a therapeutic garden. Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge; pp. 116–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gullone E. 2000. The biophilia hypothesis and life in the 21st century: increasing mental health or increasing pathology? J Happiness Stud. 1(3):293–322. doi:10.1023/A:1010043827986.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Taylor R. 2004. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J Environ Psychol. 24(2):247–255. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han K-T. 2001. A review: theories of restorative environments. J Ther Hortic 12: 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Haque SZ, Haque M. 2017. The ecological community of commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic gastrointestinal microorganisms – an appraisal. Clin exp gl. 10:91. doi:10.2147/CEG.S126243.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan A, Tao J, Li G, Jiang M, Aii L, Zhihui J, Zongfang L, Qibing C. 2018. Effects of walking in bamboo forest and city environments on brainwave activity in young adults. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018:9653857. eng. doi:10.1155/2018/9653857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog TR, Kutzli GE. 2002. Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environ Behav. 34(6):819–835. doi:10.1177/001391602237250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley TH. 1869. Nature: aphorisms by Goethe. Nature. 1(1):9–11. doi:10.1038/001009a0.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Mansell W. 2021. A thematic analysis of multiple pathways between nature engagement activities and well-being [original research]. Front Psychol. 12:12. English. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA, Jacobs JA. 2000. Commentaries on “the ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior”. Psychol Inq. 11(4):269–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings V, Bamkole O. 2019. The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(3):452. doi:10.3390/ijerph16030452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S. 2014. Therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens: a review of Chinese literature in relation to the studies in western countries. Front Archit Res. 3(2):141–153. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2013.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang S-Y, Ma A, Ramachandran S. 2018. Negative Air Ions and their effects on human health and Air quality Improvement. Int J Mol Sci. 19(10):2966. doi:10.3390/ijms19102966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JN DB, Pope ZC, Mitchell NR, Schneider IE, Larson JM, Horton TH, Pereira MA. 2020. The effect of green walking on heart rate variability: a pilot crossover study. Environ Res. 185:109408. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye Y. 2007. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev gen psychol. 11(4):305–328. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye Y, De Block A. 2011. ’Nature and I are two’: a critical examination of the biophilia hypothesis. Environ Values. 20(2):189–215. doi:10.3197/096327111X12997574391724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye Y, Dewitte S. 2018. Nature’s broken path to restoration. A critical look at Attention Restoration Theory. J Environ Psychol. 59:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye Y, van den Berg A. 2011. Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban for Urban Greening. 10(4):261–268. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 15(3):169–182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R, Kaplan S. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York, USA: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• King GM. 2014. Urban microbiomes and urban ecology: how do microbes in the built environment affect human sustainability in cities? J Microbiol. 52(9):721–728. doi:10.1007/s12275-014-4364-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo M. 2015. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway [mini review]. Front Psychol. 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahart I, Darcy P, Gidlow C, Calogiuri G. 2019. The effects of green exercise on physical and mental wellbeing: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(8):1352. eng. doi:10.3390/ijerph16081352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai J, Liu B, Wang H. 2022. Does the “Tian-Ren-He-Yi” belief system promote corporate environmental performance? Front Psychol. 13:1909. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886114.
   Google Scholar
• Laland KN, Brown GR. 2006. Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev. 15(3):95–104. doi:10.1002/evan.20093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon AC, Woosnam KM, Kyle GT, Keith SJ. 2021. Psychological needs satisfaction and attachment to natural landscapes. Environ Behav. 53(6):661–683. doi:10.1177/0013916520916255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, Chen X, Yin J, Da L. 2014. The spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of negative air ions in urban forests, Shanghai, China. J For Res. 25(4):847–856. doi:10.1007/s11676-014-0475-9.
   Google Scholar
• Liang S, Wu X, Jin F. 2018. Gut-brain psychology: rethinking psychology from the microbiota–gut–brain axis [review]. Front Integr Neurosci. 12:12.English10.3389/fnint.2018.00033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Browning MHEM, Dzhambov AM, Zhang G, Cao Y. 2022. Green space for mental health in the COVID-19 era: a pathway analysis in residential green space users. Land. 11(8):1128. doi:10.3390/land11081128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Browning MHEM, Rigolon A, Larson LR, Taff D, Labib SM, Benfield J, Yuan S, McAnirlin O, Hatami N, et al. 2022. Beyond “bluespace” and “greenspace”: a narrative review of possible health benefits from exposure to other natural landscapes. Sci Total Environ. 856:159292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X. 2019. Correlation analysis between air quality of ecological environment in forest oxygen bar and respiratory disease of morning runners. Ekoloji. 28(108):1883–1887.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang R, Grekousis G, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Li Z. 2019. Neighbourhood greenness and mental wellbeing in Guangzhou, China: what are the pathways? Landsc Urban Plan. 190:103602. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang X, Bi S, Cao Y, Zhang G. 2022. Psychological benefits of green exercise in wild or urban greenspaces: ameta-analysis of controlled trials. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 68:127458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang X, Wang H, Yang Z, Liu H, Cao Y, Zhang G. 2021. Access to nature via virtual reality: a mini-review [mini review]. Front Psychol. 12:4324.English10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725288.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang X, You C, Chen X, Cao Y, Zhang G. 2021. Can viewing nature through windows improve isolated living? a pathway analysis on chinese male prisoners during the COVID-19 epidemic [original research]. Front Psychiatry. 12:12. English. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.720722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas J, SME VD, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP. 2009. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place. 15(2):586–595. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, De Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P. 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health. 60(7):587–592. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald KJ, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI, Schermer JA. 2020. Predicting loneliness from where and what people do. Soc Sci. 9(4):51. doi:10.3390/socsci9040051.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki M, Aalto J, Hellén H, Pihlatie M, Bäck J. 2019. Interannual and seasonal dynamics of volatile organic compound fluxes from the boreal forest floor. Front Plant Sci. 10:191. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markevych I, Schoierer J, Hartig T, Chudnovsky A, Hystad P, Dzhambov AM, De Vries S, Triguero-Mas M, Brauer M, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2017. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ Res. 158:301–317. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marselle MR, Stadler J, Korn H, Irvine KN, Bonn A. 2019. Biodiversity and health in the face of climate change. New York, USA: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel C, Reese G. 2021. Implicit associations with nature and urban environments: effects of lower-level processed image properties [original research]. Front Psychol. 12:12.English10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran D. 2019. Back to nature? attention restoration theory and the restorative effects of nature contact in prison. Health Place. 57:35–43. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai Y, Nakashima T, Ohira H, Shirakawa T. 2007. Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health. 121(1):54–63. eng. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller W, Milner J, Loh M, Vardoulakis S, Wilkinson P. 2022. Exposure to urban greenspace and pathways to respiratory health: an exploratory systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 829:154447. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. 2021. New urban models for more sustainable, liveable and healthier cities post covid19; reducing air pollution, noise and heat island effects and increasing green space and physical activity. Environ Int. 157:106850. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard B, Draborg E, Andreasen J, Juhl CB, Yost J, Brunnhuber K, Robinson KA, Lund H. 2022. Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 145:1–33. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Hoehn R, Crane DE. 2007. Oxygen production by urban trees in the United States. Arboriculture Urban For. 3333(33):220–226. doi:10.48044/jauf.2007.026.
   Google Scholar
• Ohly H, White MP, Wheeler BW, Bethel A, Ukoumunne OC, Nikolaou V, Garside R. 2016. Attention Restoration Theory: a systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J Toxicology Environ Health Part B. 19(7):305–343. doi:10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson J, Grahn P. 2008. The role of natural settings in crisis rehabilitation: how does the level of crisis influence the response to experiences of nature with regard to measures of rehabilitation? Landscape Res. 33(1):51–70. doi:10.1080/01426390701773813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson J, Grahn P. 2021. Nature archetypes–concepts related to objects and phenomena in natural environments. A Swedish case. Front Psychol. 11:3909. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pálsdóttir AM 2014. The role of nature in rehabilitation for individuals with stress-related mental disorders. Vol. 2014. 2014: 45.
   Google Scholar
• Philippe FL, Vallerand RJ. 2008. Actual environments do affect motivation and psychological adjustment: a test of self-determination theory in a natural setting. Motiv Emot. 32(2):81–89. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9087-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä M, Neuvonen M, Borodulin K, Korpela K, Sievänen T, Tyrväinen L. 2015. Relationships between exposure to urban green spaces, physical activity and self-rated health. J Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 10:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Pratiwi PI, Xiang Q, Furuya K. 2020. physiological and psychological effects of walking in urban parks and its imagery in different seasons in middle-aged and older adults: evidence from Matsudo City, Japan. Sustainability. 12(10):4003. doi:10.3390/su12104003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese G, Kohler E, Menzel C. 2021. Restore or get restored: the effect of control on stress reduction and restoration in virtual nature settings. Sustainability. 13(4):1995. doi:10.3390/su13041995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigolon A, Browning MH, McAnirlin O, Yoon HV. 2021. Green space and health equity: a systematic review on the potential of green space to reduce health disparities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(5):2563. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roviello V, Gilhen-Baker M, Vicidomini C, Roviello GN. 2021. Forest-bathing and physical activity as weapons against COVID-19: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 20(1):letters.1–10. eng. doi:10.1007/s10311-021-01321-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2017. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, USA: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Santhosh KV, Roy BK, Bhowmik PK Oxygen level monitoring in an oxygen cylinder. IEEE-International Conference On Advances In Engineering, Science And Management (ICAESM-2012), 2012 Nagapattinam, India. IEEE, 592–595.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebel T, Gallinat J, Kühn S. 2022. Testing the Biophilia theory: automatic approach tendencies towards nature. J Environ Psychol. 79:101725. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffee N, Abd Shukor SF. 2018. The effect of natural settings on stress reduction. Alam Cipta. 11(2):25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shin JC, Parab KV, An R, Grigsby-Toussaint DS. 2020. Greenspace exposure and sleep: a systematic review. Environ Res. 182:109081. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.109081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin WS, Shin CS, Yeoun PS, Kim JJ. 2011. The influence of interaction with forest on cognitive function. Scand J for Res. 26(6):595–598. doi:10.1080/02827581.2011.585996.
   Google Scholar
• Skår M. 2010. Forest dear and forest fear: dwellers’ relationships to their neighbourhood forest. Landsc Urban Plan. 98(2):110–116. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanhope J, Breed MF, Weinstein P. 2020. Exposure to greenspaces could reduce the high global burden of pain. Environ Res. 187:109641. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigsdotter U, Grahn P. 2002. What makes a garden a healing garden. J Ther Hortic. 13(2):60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Stigsdotter UK, Palsdottir AM, Burls A, Chermaz A, Ferrini F, Grahn P. 2011. Nature-based therapeutic interventions. In: Nilsson K, Sangster M Gallis C et al., editors. Forests, Trees and Human Health. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; pp. 309–342.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltz J, Lundell Y, Skärbäck E, MA VDB, Grahn P, Nordström E-M, Dolling A. 2016. Planning for restorative forests: describing stress-reducing qualities of forest stands using available forest stand data. Eur J For Res. 135(5):803–813. doi:10.1007/s10342-016-0974-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Woolley H 2003. Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environment ( 1978).94–106.
   Google Scholar
• S-X Z, F-F H, S-Y H, Qiu Q, Su Y, He Q, J-Y L. 2021. Comprehensive evaluation of healthcare benefits of different forest types: a case study in shimen national forest park, China. Forests. 12(2):207. doi:10.3390/f12020207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamakoshi S, Shimai S, Sogo S, Yagi A. 2011. The psychophysiological effects of the fireplace. Psychologia. 54(2):68–79. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2011.68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M. 2004. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience. 54(6):585–590. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0585:GUATSO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. 2018. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res. 166:628–637. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Sci NY. 224(4647):420–421. eng. doi:10.1126/science.6143402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS. 1993. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. Biophilia Hypothesis. 7:73–137.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 11(3):201–230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uvnäs-Moberg K. 1997. Physiological and endocrine effects of social contact. The integrative neurobiology of affiliation. New York, NY, US: New York Academy of Sciences; pp. 146–163.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Wendel-Vos W, van Poppel M, Kemper H, van Mechelen W, Maas J. 2015. Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Urban for Urban Greening. 14(4):806–816. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter J, Britton RA, Roos S 2011. Host-microbial symbiosis in the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract and the lactobacillus reuteri paradigm Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(supplement_1):4645–4652. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000099107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Jin Y, Liu Y, Li D, Zhang B. 2018. Comparing social media data and survey data in assessing the attractiveness of Beijing Olympic forest park. Sustainability. 10(2):382. doi:10.3390/su10020382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton DE. 2006. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 174(6):801–809. doi:10.1503/cmaj.051351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2022. Physical activity. [ accessed 2023 January 11th]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1984. Biophilia Cambridge. MA: Har.
   Google Scholar
• Wöran B, Arnberger A. 2012. Exploring relationships between recreation specialization, restorative environments and mountain hikers’ flow experience. Leisure Sci. 34(2):95–114. doi:10.1080/01490400.2012.652502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Cai H, Yang Z, Zhao X, Li M, Han R, Chen SX. 2022. Why does nature enhance psychological well-being? a self-determination account. J Environ Psychol. 83:101872. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Ho JYS, Wong FKY, Chang KKP, Chan KL, Wong MS, Ho HC, Yuen JWM, Huang J, Siu JYM. 2020. Neighbourhood green space, perceived stress and sleep quality in an urban population. Urban For Urban Greening. 54:126763. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Van Dijk T, Tang J, AEvd B. 2015. green space attachment and health: a comparative study in two urban neighborhoods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 12(11):14342–14363. doi:10.3390/ijerph121114342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorić M, Kostić S, Kladar N, Božin B, Vasić V, Kebert M, Orlović S. 2021. phytochemical screening of volatile organic compounds in three common coniferous tree species in terms of forest ecosystem services. Forests. 12(7):928. doi:10.3390/f12070928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar