Toward sustainable household laundry. Washing quality vs. environmental impacts

References

• Abney SE, Ijaz MK, McKinney J, Gerba CP. 2021. Laundry hygiene and odor control: state of the science. Appl Environ Microbiol. 87(14):e03002–03020. doi:10.1128/AEM.03002-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai B, Grunwald MH, Davidovici B, Farhi R, Shemer A. 2013. The effect of domestic laundry processes on fungal contamination of socks. Int J Dermatol. 52(11):1392–1394. doi:10.1111/ijd.12167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bockmühl DP, Schages J, Rehberg L. 2019. Laundry and textile hygiene in healthcare and beyond. Microbial Cell. 6(7):299. doi:10.15698/mic2019.07.682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron BA. 2007. Laundering in cold water: detergent considerations for consumers. Fam Consum Sci Res J. 36(2):151–162. doi:10.1177/1077727X07308159.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Ji X, Chu J, Xu P, Wang L. 2021. A review: life cycle assessment of cotton textiles. Ind Textila. 72(01):19–29. doi:10.35530/IT.072.01.1797.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele J, Pant R, Schowanek D, Salducci N 2006. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Ariel “Actif à froid”(2006), a laundry detergent that allows to wash at colder wash temperatures, with previous Ariel laundry detergents (1998, 2001). Procter & Gamble, Brussels Innovation Center, Central Product Safety-Environmental: Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Drol P, Kert M, Simoncic B, Hladnik A. 2012. Evaluation of the influence of different parameters in removing standard soil from cotton fabric using multi-factorial analysis of variance. Tekstilec. 55(3):194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle U, Lange A, Dewaele J, Schowanek D. 2007. LCA study and environmental benefits for low temperature disinfection process in commercial laundry (12 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 12(2):127–138. doi:10.1065/lca2006.05.245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri A, Osset M, Abeliotis K, Amberg C, Candan C, Owens J, Stamminger R. 2016. Laundry performance: effect of detergent and additives on consumer satisfaction. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 53(4):375–386. doi:10.3139/113.110451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülümser T. 2010. Soil releasing effect of concentrated detergents compared with the ordinary ones. Textile and Apparel. 20(4):329–335.
   Google Scholar
• Heinzel M, Kyas A, Weide M, Breves R, Bockmühl DP. 2010. Evaluation of the virucidal performance of domestic laundry procedures. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 213(5):334–337. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honisch M, Brands B, Weide M, Speckmann H-D, Stamminger R, Bockmühl DP. 2016. Antimicrobial efficacy of laundry detergents with regard to time and temperature in domestic washing machines. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 53(6):547–552. doi:10.3139/113.110465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honisch M, Stamminger R, Bockmühl DP. 2014. Impact of wash cycle time, temperature and detergent formulation on the hygiene effectiveness of domestic laundering. J Appl Microbiol. 117(6):1787–1797. doi:10.1111/jam.12647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson I, Somasundaran P. 2007. Handbook for Cleaning/decontamination of Surfaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Laitala K, Jensen HM. 2010. Cleaning effect of household laundry detergents at low temperatures. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 47(6):413–420. doi:10.3139/113.110096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Chen J, Jiang L. 2014. Elevated critical micelle concentration in soil–water system and its implication on PAH removal and surfactant selecting. Environ Earth Sci. 71:3991–3998. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2783-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maceno MMC, João S, Voltolini DR, Zattar IC. 2022. Life cycle assessment and circularity evaluation of the non-medical masks in the Covid-19 pandemic: a Brazilian case. Environ Dev Sustainability. 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02388-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monleón-Getino T, Cavalleri M. 2022. International ring trial to validate a new method for testing the antimicrobial efficacy of domestic laundry products. Plos One. 17(6):e0269556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan E, Foxon TJ, Tallontire A. 2018. ‘I prefer 30°’?: business strategies for influencing consumer laundry practices to reduce carbon emissions. J Clean Prod. 190:234–250. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsali S. 2017. Damage assessment of bitumen refineries using simapro (LCA) inventory data. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 8(1):317. doi:10.4172/2157-7463.1000317.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, et al. 2022. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 399(10325):629–655. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebello S, Anoopkumar A, Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A, Aneesh EM. 2020. Comparative life-cycle analysis of synthetic detergents and biosurfactants—an overview. Refining Biomass Residue Sustainable Energy Bioprod. 511–521.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds KA, Verhougstraete MP, Mena KD, Sattar SA, Scott EA, Gerba CP. 2022. Quantifying pathogen infection risks from household laundry practices. J Appl Microbiol. 132(2):1435–1448. doi:10.1111/jam.15273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley K, Williams J, Owen L, Shen J, Davies A, Laird K. 2017. The effect of low-temperature laundering and detergents on the survival of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus on textiles used in healthcare uniforms. J Appl Microbiol. 123(1):280–286. doi:10.1111/jam.13485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT. 2012. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggerio CA. 2021. Sustainability and sustainable development: a review of principles and definitions. Sci Total Environ. 786:147481. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa Z, Da P, Hb L, Ma L. 2020. The application of home-made Achilles tendon teaching aids combined adhesive tape in explaining Achilles tendon teaching. Asian J Surg. 44(2):494–495. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.11.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schages J, Stamminger R, Bockmühl DP. 2020. A new method to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of domestic laundry detergents. J Surfactants Deterg. 23(3):629–639. doi:10.1002/jsde.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahmohammadi S, Steinmann Z, Clavreul J, Hendrickx H, King H, Huijbregts MA. 2018. Quantifying drivers of variability in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of consumer products—a case study on laundry washing in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 23(10):1940–1949. doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1426-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y, Park J, Park W. 2020. Sterilization efficiency of pathogen-contaminated cottons in a laundry machine. J Microbiol. 58(1):30–38. doi:10.1007/s12275-020-9391-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimaPro. 2016. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro. Retrived from https://wwwpresustainabilitycom/legacy/download/SimaPro8IntroductionToLCApdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn J, Nielsen KS, Birkved M, Joanes T, Gwozdz W. 2021. The environmental impacts of clothing: evidence from United States and three European countries. Sustainable Prod Consumption. 27:2153–2164. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavčer PF. 2020. Influence of bleach activators in removing different soils from cotton fabric. Fibres Text East Eur. 28(3(141)):74–78. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.9023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavčer PF, Brenčič K, Fink R, Tomšič B. 2022. Influence of hydrogen peroxide on disinfection and soil removal during low-temperature household laundry. Molecules. 27(1):195. doi:10.3390/molecules27010195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates L, Evans D. 2016. Dirtying Linen: re-evaluating the sustainability of domestic laundry. Environ Policy Governance. 26(2):101–115. doi:10.1002/eet.1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn M-K, Flemming H-C, Bockmühl D. 2022. A comprehensive view of microbial communities in the laundering cycle suggests a preventive effect of soil bacteria on malodour formation. Microorganisms. 10(7):1465. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10071465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar