Creep ductility considerations for high energy components manufactured from creep strength enhanced steels

References

• Guidelines and specifications for high-reliability fossil power plants 2nd edition: best practice guideline for manufacturing and construction of Grade 91 steel components. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2015. p. 3002006390.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Kushima H, Sawada K. Long-term creep strength property of advanced ferritic creep resistant steels. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advances in Materials Technology; EPRI/ASM International; 2011. p. 748.
   Google Scholar
• Parker JD. Creep cavitation in CSEF steels. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plant; EPRI/ASM; 2014. p. 714.
   Google Scholar
• Supporting data for reducing the minimum allowable post-weld heat treatment for power generation applications of Grade 91 steel. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2015. p. 3002006757.
   Google Scholar
• Balluffi RW, Seigle LL. Effect of grain boundaries upon pore formation and dimensional changes during diffusion. Acta Met. 1955;3:170–177.10.1016/0001-6160(55)90087-0
   Google Scholar
• DiStefano JR, Sikka VK. “Summary of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel development program”, 1975–1986. Oak Ridge (TN): ORNL. Oct 1986. ORNL 6303.
   Google Scholar
• Masuyama F, Toyoda T. Creep strength and mechanical properties of air-melt mod. 9Cr-1Mo cast steel. International Symposium on Improved Technology for Fossil Power Plants New and Retrofit Applications; 1993 March 1–2; Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Abe F. Creep deformation behavior and alloy design philosophy of creep-resistant tempered martensitic 9Cr steel. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Fired Power Plants (ASM International); 2011 March 1;20:620–639.
   Google Scholar
• The influence of steel making and processing variables on the microstructure and properties of creep-strength-enhanced ferritic (CSEF) steel Grade 91. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2015. p. 3002004370.
   Google Scholar
• The benefits of improved control of composition of creep-strength-enhanced ferritic steel Grade 91. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2015. p. 3002003472.
   Google Scholar
• Brett SJ, Bates JS, Thomson RC. Aluminium nitride precipitation in low strength Grade 91 power plant steels. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants; ASM International; 2005. p. 1183–1197.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Sawada K, Kushima H, et al. Influence of chemical composition and heat treatment on long-term creep strength of Grade 91 steel. Proc Eng. 2013;55:2–9.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.211
   Google Scholar
• Siefert JA, Parker JD. Evaluation of the creep cavitation behavior in Grade 91 steels. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip. Feb 2016;138:31–44.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigeyama H, Takahashi Y, Parker J. Simulation of creep deformation and rupture of notched bar specimens of Grade 92 steel. ASME PVP 2015–45252 ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2015; July 19–23, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• NIMS. Data sheets on the elevated temperature properties of 9Cr-½Mo-1.8 W-V-Nb steel tube for power boilers ASME SA-213 Grade T92 and 9Cr-½Mo-1.8 W-V-Nb steel pipe for high temperature service ASME SA-335 Grade P92, NIMS Datasheet 48, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Panait C, Gourgues-Lorenzon A, Besson J, et al. Long term aging effect on the creep strength of the T92 steel. 9th Liege conference: Materials for Advanced Power Engineering 2010; Liege, Belgium; Julich forschungszentrum; 2010. p. 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• van Wortel H. Reliability and limitations of the non destructive replica technique for the assessment of creep damage in welded components, ASME 2007 pressure vessels and piping conference volume 9. Eighth International Conference on Creep and Fatigue at Elevated Temperatures; San Antonio, Texas, USA; 2007 July 22–26, CREEP2007-26310. p. 567–572.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for rating the microstructural composition and creep rupture damage of creep-resistant steel for high pressure pipelines and boiler components and their weld connections, VGB-S-517-00-2014-11-DE-EN-ebook. Publication date: Jan 7, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Life management of creep-strength enhanced Grade 91 steels – atlas of microstructures: base metal, Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2013. p. 3002000080.
   Google Scholar
• Life management of creep-strength enhanced Grade 91 steels – atlas of microstructures: welds. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI; 2013. p. 3002000081.
   Google Scholar
• Lenk P, Proft D, Kussmaul A, et al. Einfluss der Mehrachsigkeit der Belastung auf die Kriechporenbildung und die zeitliche Schaedigungsentwicklung bei typischen Kraftwerksbaustaehlen [Influence of the multiaial load on creep pore formation and the time dependent damage development in typical power plant components, Mechanical Engineering Research]. Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau e.V., Heft. 2000;251.
   Google Scholar
• Benci JE, Pope DP, George EP. Creep damage nucleation sites in ferrous alloys. Mat Sci Eng. 1988;103:97–102. Workshop on the Mechanics and Physics of Crack Growth: Application to Life Prediction; 1987 August 4–7; Keystone, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• George EP, Pope DP. Impurity-induced changes in interfacial strength and their role in creep fracture. MRS Proc. 1988;122:391. doi:10.1557/PROC-122-391.
   Google Scholar
• Cane BJ. Creep cavitation and rupture in 2¼Cr1Mo steel under uniaxial and multiaxial stresses. Third International Conference on Mechanical Behaviour of Materials; Cambridge, England: Pergamon Press; Vol. 2; 1979. p. 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Rice JR, Tracey DM. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids. 1969;17:201–217.10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocks ACF, Ashby MF. Intergranular fracture during power-law creep under multiaxial stress. Metal Sci. 1980;14:395–402.10.1179/030634580790441187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Tack AJ, Thomas CW, et al. The development of a multiaxial stress rupture criterion for bolting steels using new and service aged materials. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip. 2000;77:91–97.10.1016/S0308-0161(99)00088-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Thomas CW, Knowles D. Multiaxial stress rupture behaviour and stress-state sensitivity of creep damage distribution in Durehete 1055 and 2.25Cr1Mo steel. Int J Pressure Vessels Pip. 2004;81(6):535–542.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal S, Laha K, Mathew MD. “Creep life prediction of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel under multiaxial state of stress”, 1st international conference on structural integrity, ICONS-2014. Proc Eng. 2014;86:150–157.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.023
   Google Scholar
• Parker JD. Component relevant creep damage in tempered martensitic 9 to 12%Cr steels. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plant; EPRI/ASM; 2016, to be published.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin IJ, Parker JD. Evolving design methods for modern high temperature power plant components. ASME PVP. 2016;5:63978
   Google Scholar
• Parker JD, Parsons AWJ. Fracture behaviour of low alloy steel weldments. ASME Pressure Vessel Pip Conf Minneapolis. 1994;288:423–428.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch DJ, Holdsworth SR, McCarthy PR. The influence of net section area on the notched bar creep rupture lives of three power plant steels. Proceedings of Institute of Metals 3rd International Conference on Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials; Swansea; April 1987. p. 441–458.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, West GD, Thomson RC, et al. Advances in materials technology for fossil power plant. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference; 2013 October 22–25; Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA; EPRI/ASM; 2014. p. 596–606.
   Google Scholar