Modification of the reactive synthesis of porous FeAl with addition of Si

References

• Stoloff NS . Iron aluminides: present status and future prospects. Mat Sci Eng A. 1998;258(1–2):1–14. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00909-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H , Liu X , Jiang Y , et al . Direct separation of arsenic and antimony oxides by high-temperature filtration with porous FeAl intermetallic. J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:364–371. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NovickV J , AhluwaliaR K , Natesan K , et al . Performance of an iron aluminide metal filter in a reducing environment. J Mater Eng Perform. 2001;10(3):349–361. doi:10.1361/105994901770345079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich S . Hot gas filtration – a review. Fuel. 2003;104(2):83–94. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.059.
   Google Scholar
• Dong HX , He YH , Zou J , et al . Effect of preheating treatment at 575 C of green compacts on porous NiAl. J Alloy Compd. 2010;492(1–2):219–225. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák P , Michalcová A , Marek I , et al . On the formation of intermetallics in Fe–Al system – an in situ XRD study. Intermetallics. 2013;32:127–136. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2012.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiaszko D , Mościcki R . Kinetics study on the SHS reaction in massive samples with high heating rate in the Fe–Al system. J Alloy Compd. 2015;632:335–342. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sina H , Corneliusson J , Turba K , et al . A study on the formation of iron aluminide (FeAl) from elemental powders. J Alloy Compd. 2015;636:261–269. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao HY , He YH , Shen PZ , et al . Effect of heating rate on pore structure of porous FeAl material. Powder Metall. 2008;51(2):171–175. doi:10.1179/174329008X271673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao HY , He YH , Shen P . Z, ea al. Porous FeAl intermetallics fabricated by elemental powder reactive synthesis. Intermetallics. 2009;17(12):1041–1046. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2009.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alman DE , Govier RD . Influence of Al additions on the reactive synthesis of MoSi 2. Scripta Mater. 1996;34(8):1287–1293. doi:10.1016/1359-6462(95)00655-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karczewski K , Jóźwiak S , Chojnacki M , et al . The influence of different additives on the kinetics of self-propagating high-temperature synthesis during the sintering process of Fe and Al elemental powders. Intermetallics. 2010;18(7):1401–1404. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chojnacki M , Jóźwiak S , Karczewski K , et al . Modification of Fe and Al elemental powders’ sintering with addition of magnesium and magnesium hydride. Intermetallics. 2013;19(10):1555–1562. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2011.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák P , Michalcová A , Šerák J , et al . Preparation of Ti–Al–Si alloys by reactive sintering. J Alloy Compd. 2009;4709(1-2):123–126. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.046.
   Google Scholar
• Novák P , Michalcová A , Voděrová M , et al . Effect of reactive sintering conditions on microstructure of Fe–Al–Si alloys. J Alloy Compd. 2010;493(1-2):81–86. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák P , Knotek V , Voděrová M , et al . Intermediary phases formation in Fe–Al–Si alloys during reactive sintering. J Alloy Compd. 2010;497(1):90–94. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák P , Knotek V , Šerák J , et al . Synthesis of Fe–Al–Si intermediary phases by reactive sintering. Powder Metall. 2011;54(2):167–171. doi:10.1179/174329009X449314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B , Phelan D , Dippenaar R . Role of silicon in solidification microstructure in hot-dipped 55 wt-% Al–Zn–Si coatings. Mat Sci Eng A. 2008;473(1-2):76–80. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahani P , KarakSK Mishra B , et al . A comparative study on SiC–B 4 C–Si cermet prepared by pressureless sintering and spark plasma sintering methods. Metall Mater Trans A. 2016;47(6):3065–3076. doi:10.1007/s11661-016-3401-2.
   Google Scholar
• Weber BC , Hessinger PS . Silicon-base cermets and related observations. J Am Ceram Soc. 2010;37(37):267–272. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1954.tb14035.x.
   Google Scholar
• Eggersmann M , Mehrer H . Diffusion in intermetallic phases of the Fe–Al system. Philos Mag A. 2010; 80(5): 1219–1244. doi:10.1080/01418610008212112
   Google Scholar
• Gedevanishvili S , Deevi SC . Processing of iron aluminides by pressureless sintering through Fe+Al elemental route. Mat Sci Eng A. 2002; 325(1-2): 163–176. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01442-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SP . Intermetallic compound formation in Fe–Al–Si ternary system: part I. Mater Charact. 2002; 49(4): 269–291. doi. 10.1016/S1044-5803(03)00006-8
   Google Scholar
• Naoi D , Kajihara M . Growth behavior of Fe2Al5 during reactive diffusion between Fe and Al at solid-state temperatures. Mat Sci Eng A. 2007;459(1–2):375–382. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y , SchusterJC LiuZ-K , et al . A thermodynamic description of the Al–Fe–Si system over the whole composition and temperature ranges via a hybrid approach of CALPHAD and key experiments. Intermetallics. 2008;16(4):554–570. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D , Tu H , Zhou S , et al . Effect of silicon on the reaction between solid iron and liquid Zn-22.3 wt-% Al bath. Sur Coat Tech. 2016; 305: 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon SC , Lee JY . Interface morphology between the aluminide layer and iron substrate in the hot-dip aluminizing process. Can Metall Quart. 1981;20(3):351–357. doi:10.1179/000844381795270156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K , Liu Y , Tu H , et al . Effect of Si on the growth of Fe–Al intermetallic layer in Zn–11%Al–3%Mg coating. Sur Coat Tech. 2016;306:390–396. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar