The Real ‘Letter to Arbuthnot’? a Motive For Hume's Probability Theory in an Early Modern Design Argument

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Anonymous [Richard Allestree]. The Practice of Christian Graces: Or the Whole Duty of Man. London: D. Maxwell for T. Garthwait, 1658.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnot, John. Of the Laws of Chance, or, a Method of Calculation of the Hazards of Game Plainly Demonstrated, and Applied to Games at Present Most in Use, Which May Easily Be Extended to the Most Intricate Cases of Chance Imaginable. London: B. Motte, 1692.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnot, John. ‘A Treatise of Chance Written by Dr. Arbuthnot in Anno 1694’. Unsigned manuscript in Arbuthnot's hand, Gregory Collection, University of Edinburgh Library, MS Dk.1.2. Fol. B [no. 19]. http://www.nahste.ac.uk/cgi-bin/view_isad.pl?id=GB-0237-David-Gregory-Dk-1-2-2-Folio-B-19&view=basic
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnot, John. ‘An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ'd in the Births of Both Sexes’. Philosophical Transactions (1683–1775) 27, no. 328 (1711–1712): 186–90. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1710.0011
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnot, John. Of the Laws of Chance. 4th ed. London: B. Motte and C. Bathurst, 1738.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, Annette. A Progress of Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Barfoot, Michael. ‘Hume and the Culture of Science in the Early Eighteenth Century’. In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by M. A. Stewart, 150–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, repr. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bellhouse, David R. ‘A Manuscript on Chance Written by John Arbuthnot’. International Statistical Review 57, no. 3 (1989): 249–59. doi: 10.2307/1403798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellhouse, David R. ‘Banishing Fortuna: Montmort and De Moivre’. Journal of the History of Ideas 69, no. 4 (Oct. 2008): 559–81. doi: 10.1353/jhi.0.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellhouse, David R. Abraham De Moivre: Setting the Stage for Classical Probability and Its Application. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, Richard. Sermons Preached at Boyle’s Lecture (1697). Reprinted as Eight Sermons, Preached at Robert Boyle’s Lecture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1809. Also reprinted in The Works of Richard Bentley, edited by Alexander Dyce. New York: AMS Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Bernoulli, Jacob. The Art of Conjecturing (1713). Translated by Edith Dudley Sylla. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, James. Boswell's Edinburgh Journals 1767–1786, edited by Hugh M. Milne. Edinburgh: Mercat Press, 2001. Revised edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, John Hill. Life and Correspondence of David Hume. 2 vols. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1846.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, Daniel. ‘The Framing of the Fundamental Probability Set: A Historical Case Study on the Context of Mathematical Discovery’. Perspectives on Science 17, no. 4 (2009): 385–416. doi: 10.1162/posc.2009.17.4.385
   Google Scholar
• Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De natura deorum. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Mark. ‘A New Look at Hume's Theory of Probabilistic Inference’. Hume Studies 31, no. 1 (Apr. 2005): 21–36. doi: 10.1353/hms.2011.0287
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine. ‘Probability and Evidence’. In Vol. 2 of The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, edited by D. Garber and M. Ayers, 1108–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• De Moivre, Abraham. The Doctrine of Chances. London: W. Pearson, 1718.
   Google Scholar
• De Moivre, Abraham. The Doctrine of Chances. 2nd ed. London: H. Woodfall, 1738.
   Google Scholar
• De Moivre, Abraham. The Doctrine of Chances. 3rd ed. London: A. Millar, 1756.
   Google Scholar
• Derham, William. Physico-Theology: or, a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. London: W. Innys, 1714.
   Google Scholar
• Fontenelle, Bernard. The Lives of the French, Italian and German Philosophers, Late Members of the Royale Academy of Sciences in Paris. London: W. Innys, 1717.
   Google Scholar
• Gower, Barry. ‘Hume on Probability’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, no. 1 (1991): 1–19. doi: 10.1093/bjps/42.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graunt, John. Natural and Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index, and Made upon the Bills of Mortality. 5th ed. London: John Martyn, 1676.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, J. Y. T., ed. The Letters of David Hume. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrini, Anita. ‘The Tory Newtonians: Gregory, Pitcairne, and Their Circle’. The Journal of British Studies 25, no. 3 (1986): 288–311. doi: 10.1086/385866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Hendel, Charles W. Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. Enquiries: Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (1748 & 1751), edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd ed. Revised, edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature (1738–1739), edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd ed. revised, edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David Fate and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Huygens, Christiann. ‘De ratiociniis in ludo Aleae’. In Exercitationum Mathematicarum libri quinque, edited by F. van Schooten, 517–34. Leiden: Elsevier, 1657.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan, 1921. Republished, Mineola, NY: Dover, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lucretius. On the Nature of Things. Translated by Martin Ferguson Smith. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees: Or Private Vices, Publick Benefits (1705–1729). 2 vols. Edited by F. B. Kaye. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. Reprinted by Liberty Press, Indianapolis, 1988. http://www.amazon.com/Fable-Bees-Private-Publick-Benefits/dp/0865970726/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1404358369&sr=1-2&keywords=Mandeville+Fable+Kaye.
   Google Scholar
• Millican, Peter. Reading Hume on Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Montmort, Pierre Rémond de. Essay d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard [Essay on the analysis of games of chance]. 2nd ed. Paris: Quillau, 1713.
   Google Scholar
• Mossner, Ernst. ‘Hume's Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot, 1734: The Biographical Significance’. Huntington Library Quarterly 7 (1944): 135–52. doi: 10.2307/3815989
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwentyt, Bernard. The Religious Philosopher: Or, the Right Use of Contemplating the Works of the Creator. 3 vols. Translated by John Chamberlayne. London: J. Senex and W. Taylor, 1718.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, D. F., and Mary Norton. The David Hume Library. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Bibliographical Society, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Patey, Douglas Lane. Probability and Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009[1984].
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Karl. The History of Statistics in the 17th & 18th Centuries, edited by E. S. Pearson. London: Charles Griffin, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Angus. The Correspondence of Dr. John Arbuthnot. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2006; prev. ed., unpublished dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, Isabel. ‘“Galen's Muscles”: Wilkins, Hume and the Educational Use of the Argument from Design’. The Historical Journal 36, no. 3 (1993): 577–97. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X0001431X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Paul. ‘Butler's “Future State” and Hume's “Guide of Life”’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004): 425–48. doi: 10.1353/hph.2004.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Paul. The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. ‘On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44, no. 3 (September 2013): 416–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shoesmith, Eddie. ‘The Continental Controversy over Arbuthnot's Argument for Divine Providence’. Historia Mathematica 14 (1987): 133–46. doi: 10.1016/0315-0860(87)90017-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleton, David E. ‘A Modest Examination: John Arbuthnot and the Scottish Newtonians’. British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 18 (1995): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sober, Elliot. ‘The Design Argument’. In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion, edited by William Mann, 117–47. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. ‘An Early Fragment on Evil’. In Hume and Hume's Connexions, edited by M. A. Stewart and John P. Wright, 160–70. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. ‘Hume's Intellectual Development, 1711–1752’. In Impressions of Hume, edited by Marina Frasca-Spada and P. J. E. Kail, 11–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. ‘Arguments for the Existence of God: The British Debate’. In Vol. 2 of The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonssen, 710–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. ‘The Curriculum in Britain, Ireland, and the Colonies’. In Vol. 1 of The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Knud Haakonssen, 97–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, John. The Principles and Duties of Natural Religion (1675). 6th ed. London: Chiswell, 1710.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Catherine. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, David. ‘Hume's ‘Of Miracles’: Probability and Irreligion’. In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by M. A. Stewart, 191–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, repr. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, John P. ‘Dr. George Cheyne, Chevalier Ramsay, and Hume's Letter to a Physician’. Hume Studies 29, no. 1 (April 2003): 125–41. doi: 10.1353/hms.2011.0100
   Google Scholar