Play, Idleness and the Problem of Necessity in Schiller and MarcuseFootnote

1 I am grateful to Owen Hulatt, Fabian Freyenhagen, an anonymous reader and all participants at a University of Notre Dame colloquium in March 2014 for comments on earlier versions of this paper.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Allison, Henry E. Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser, Frederick. Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Deligiorgi, Katerina. ‘The Proper Telos of Life: Schiller, Kant and Having Autonomy as an End’. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54, no. 5 (2011): 494–511. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2011.608881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, Andrew. Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. New York: Routledge, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. “Repression”. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited and translated by James Strachey et al. Vol. XIV, 143–58. London: Vintage, 2001 (work originally published in 1915).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. “Beyond the Pleasure Principle”. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited and translated by James Strachey et al. Vol. XVIII, 1–64. London: Vintage, 2001 (work originally published in 1920).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. “The Ego and the Id”. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited and translated by James Strachey et al. Vol. XIX, 1–66. London: Vintage, 2001 (work originally published in 1923).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. “Civilization and it Discontents”. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited and translated by James Strachey et al. Vol. XXI, 64–145, 2001 (work originally published in 1930).
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, Dieter. “Beauty and Freedom: Schiller's Struggle with Kant's Aesthetics”. In Essays in Kant's Aesthetics, edited by Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason, translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 (work originally published in 1788).
   Google Scholar
• Lavin, Douglas. ‘Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error’. Ethics 114, no. 3 (2004): 424–57. doi: 10.1086/381695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. 2nd ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. ‘The Realm of Freedom and the Realm of Necessity: A Reconsideration’. Praxis: A Philosophical Journal 5 (1969): 20–5.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London: Routledge, 2002 (work originally published in 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, translated by Martin Milligan. New York: Prometheus Books, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. D. Schiller and the Ideal of Freedom: A Study of Schiller’s Philosophical Works with Chapters on Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, Brian. ‘Idleness, Usefulness and Self-Constitution’. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 14, no. 2 (2013): 181–99. doi: 10.1179/1440991713Z.0000000005
   Google Scholar
• Roehr, Sabine. ‘Freedom and Autonomy in Schiller’. Journal of the History of Ideas 64, no. 1 (2003): 119–34. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2003.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savile, Anthony. Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant and Schiller. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. (Aristotelian Society Series, Vol. 8.)
   Google Scholar
• Schaper, Eva. ‘Towards the Aesthetic: A Journey with Friedrich Schiller’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (1985): 153–68. doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/25.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolman, Morton. ‘Further Reflections on Work, Alienation, and Freedom in Marcuse and Marx’. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 6, no. 2 (1973): 295–302. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900039706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar