Heidegger on the Being of Monads: Lessons in Leibniz and in the Practice of Reading the History of PhilosophyFootnote

1 Thanks to the following people for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper: Mike Beaney, Jeremy Dunham, Mogens Laerke, David Leopold, Stephen Mulhall, Pauline Phemister, Lloyd Strickland, John Whipple, and an anonymous referee for the journal.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• ABBREVIATIONS
   Google Scholar
• A = Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften (Darmstadt and Berlin: Akademie, 1923-). Cited by series, volume, and page.
   Google Scholar
• AG = Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• GA9 = Martin Heidegger, Wegmarken (Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• GA10 = Martin Heidegger, Der Satz vom Grund. Translated as The Principle of Reason, translated by R. Lilly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• GA26 = Martin Heidegger, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik (Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman, 1978).
   Google Scholar
• GP = Die Philosophische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, 7 vols., edited by C. I. Gerhardt (Berlin: Weidmann, 1875–90; reprint ed. Hildesheim: Olms, 1960). Cited by volume and page.
   Google Scholar
• L = Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd ed., edited and translated by Leroy Loemker (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969).
   Google Scholar
• LDV = G. W. Leibniz, The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence, edited and translated by Paul Lodge (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• MFL = Martin Heidegger, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Michael Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• P = Martin Heidegger, Pathmarks, edited and translated by William McNeill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• SZ = Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1957).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Robert M. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, Donald L. M. ‘Corporeal Substances and True Unities’. Studia Leibnitiana XXVII, no. 2 (1995): 154–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jonathan. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, Ernst. Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. Marburg, Germany: N. G. Elwert'sche, 1902.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Giles. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Translated by Tom Conley. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. Hume Variations. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Daniel. ‘Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years’. In The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz, edited by K. Okruhlik and J. R. Brown, 27–130. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Daniel. Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, Glenn. Leibniz's Final System: Monads, Matter, and Animals. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. ‘‘Blue-Eyed Philosophers Born on Wednesdays’: An Essay on Women and History of Philosophy’. The Monist 98, no. 1  (2015): 7–20. doi: 10.1093/monist/onu003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laerke, Mogens, Justin Smith, and Eric Schliesser. Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, Paul. ‘Force and the Nature of Body in Discourse on Metaphysics §§17–18’. Leibniz Society Review 7 (1997): 116–24. doi: 10.5840/leibniz199777
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, Paul. ‘Garber's Interpretations of Leibniz on Corporeal Substance in the ‘Middle Years’’. The Leibniz Review 15 (2005): 1–26. doi: 10.5840/leibniz2005154
   Google Scholar
• Phemister, Pauline. ‘Leibniz and Elements of Compound Bodies’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7, no. 1 (1999): 57–78. doi: 10.1080/09608789908571015
   Google Scholar
• Phemister, Pauline. Leibniz and the Natural World. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’. In Philosophy and Its History, edited by R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, 49–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Donald. ‘Leibniz as Idealist’. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4 (2008): 141–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sleigh, Robert C., Jr. ‘Leibniz on the Simplicity of Substance’. Rice University Studies 63 (1977): 107–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sleigh, Robert C., Jr. Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. Individuals. London: Methuen, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Whipple, John. ‘Continual Creation and Finite Substance in Leibniz's Metaphysics’. Journal of Philosophical Research 36 (2011): 1–30. doi: 10.5840/jpr_2011_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar