636
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

Are our moral responsibility practices justified? Wittgenstein, Strawson and justification in ‘Freedom and Resentment’

ORCID Icon
Pages 603-614 | Received 04 Sep 2017, Accepted 19 Dec 2017, Published online: 11 Jan 2018

Bibliography

  • Coates, D. Justin. ‘Strawson’s Modest Transcendental Argument’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no. 4 (2017): 799–822. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2017.1284647
  • De Mesel, Benjamin. ‘Is Moral Responsibility Essentially Interpersonal? A Reply to Zimmerman’. The Journal of Ethics 21, no. 3 (2017): 309–33. doi: 10.1007/s10892-017-9251-3
  • Magill, Kevin. ‘Blaming, Understanding and Justification. A Defence of Strawson’s Naturalism about Moral Responsibility’. Chap. 9 in Free Will and Reactive Attitudes. Perspectives on P. F. Strawson’s ‘Freedom and Resentment’, edited by Michael McKenna and Paul Russell, 187–200. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
  • Strawson, P. F. ‘Freedom and Resentment’. Chapter 1 in Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–28. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
  • Strawson, P. F. Scepticism and Naturalism. Some Varieties. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.