310
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On Sellars' exam question trilemma: are Kant's premises analytic, or synthetic a priori, or a posteriori?

Pages 402-421 | Received 21 Mar 2018, Accepted 28 Aug 2018, Published online: 08 Nov 2018

Bibliography

  • Allais, Lucy. “Transcendental Idealism and the Transcendental Aesthetic: Reading the Critique of Pure Reason Forward”. In Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by J. R. O’Shea, 46–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • Ameriks, Karl. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
  • Bird, Graham. ‘Recent Interpretations of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’. Kant-Studien 65 (1974): 1–14. doi: 10.1515/kant.1974.65.1-4.1
  • Bird, Graham. “Kant’s Analytic Apparatus”. In A Companion to Kant, edited by G. Bird. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
  • Brandom, Robert B. From Empiricism to Expressivism: Brandom Reads Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
  • Conant, James. “Kant’s Critique of the Layer-Cake Conception of Human Mindedness in the B Deduction.” In Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by J. R. O’Shea, 120–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • deVries, Willem A. Wilfrid Sellars. Chesham: Acumen Publishing, and Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.
  • Erdmann, Benno. Nachträge zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kiel: Lipsius & Tischer, 1881.
  • Forster, Michael N. Kant and Skepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
  • Gava, Gabriele. ‘Kant’s Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction Between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses’. European Journal of Philosophy 23, no. 3 (2013): 728–49. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12006
  • Haag, Johannes. ‘Analytic Kantianism: Sellars and McDowell on Sensory Consciousness’. Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy 6 (2017): 18–41.
  • Kant, Immanuel. A Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1781/1787].
  • Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [1783].
  • Kant, Immanuel. Notes and Fragments. Edited by Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Kemp Smith, Norman. A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1923 [2003].
  • Körner, Stephan. ‘Transcendental Tendencies in Recent Philosophy’. Journal of Philosophy 63, no. 19 (1966): 551–61. doi: 10.2307/2024220
  • Körner, Stephan. “The Impossibility of Transcendental Deductions”. In Kant Studies Today, edited by L. W. Beck, 230–44. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1967.
  • Körner, Stephan. ‘The Impossibility of Transcendental Deductions’. The Monist, 51, no. 3 (1967): 317–31. doi: 10.5840/monist196751325
  • Land, Thomas. ‘Review of Mario Caimi, The B-Deduction (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014)’. Kantian Review 22, no. 3 (2017): 509–14. doi: 10.1017/S1369415417000218
  • Landy, David. Kants Inferentialism: The Case Against Hume. New York: Routledge, 2015.
  • Lewis, Clarence Irving. Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Dover, 1929.
  • Marshall, Colin. ‘Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 52, no. 3 (2014): 549–76. doi: 10.1353/hph.2014.0067
  • McDowell, John. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
  • O’Shea, James R. “Conceptual Connections: Kant and the Twentieth-Century Analytic Tradition.” In The Blackwell Companion to Kant, edited by Graham Bird, 513–27. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
  • O’Shea, James R. Kants Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction and Interpretation. London: Routledge, 2012.
  • O’Shea, James R. “Concepts of Objects as Prescribing Laws: A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought”. In Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, edited by Robert Stern and Gabriele Gava, 196–216. London: Routledge, 2015.
  • O’Shea, James R., ed. Sellars and His Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  • O’Shea, James R., ed. Kants Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • O’Shea, James R. “Sellars’ Interpretive Variations on Kant’s Transcendental Idealist Themes”. In Sellars and the History of Modern Philosophy, edited by Luca Corti and Antonio Nunziante, 79–96. London: Routledge, 2018.
  • O’Shea, James R. “Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy: The ‘Analytic’ Tradition”. In The Kantian Mind, edited by Sorin Baiasu and Mark Timmons. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
  • Rosenberg, Jay F. The Thinking Self. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1986 [2008].
  • Rosenberg, Jay F. Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
  • Schulting, Denis, ed. Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (ITSA). ‘Is There a Synthetic A Priori?’ Philosophy of Science 20 (1953): 121–38, revised version in American Philosophers at Work, edited by Sidney Hook (Indianapolis, IN: Criterion Press, 1957), and in Science, Perception, and Reality (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1963). doi: 10.1086/287251
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (EPM). “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I, edited by Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven, 253–329. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1956; reprinted in Science, Perception, and Reality (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1963).
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (KTE). ‘Some Remarks on Kant’s Theory of Experience’. Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967): 633–47; in 2002a (KTM), 269–82. doi: 10.2307/2024460
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (SM). Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, the John Locke Lectures for 1965-66. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968. Reissued by Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1992.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (TTC). “Towards a Theory of the Categories”. In Experience and Theory, edited by L. Foster and J. W. Swanson, 55–78. University of Massachusetts Press, 1970; in 2002a (KTM), 321–40.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (‘I’). ‘ …  This I or He or It (the Thing) Which Thinks’. The Presidential Address, American Philosophical Association (Eastern Division) for 1970, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 44 (1972): 5–31; in 2002a (KTM), 341–62.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (AR). “Autobiographical Reflections: (February, 1973)”. In Action, Knowledge and Reality: Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars, edited by Hector-Neri Castañeda, 277–93. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1975.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (KTM). Kants Transcendental Metaphysics. Sellars’ Cassirer Lectures Notes and Other Essays. Edited and introduced by Jeffrey F. Sicha. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 2002.
  • Sellars, Wilfrid (KPT). Kant and Pre-Kantian Themes: Lectures by Wilfrid Sellars. Edited by Pedro Amaral. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 2002.
  • Sperber, Peter. ‘Solving the Regress Puzzle: J. F. Fries’s Psychological Reconstruction of Kant’s Transcendental Methodology.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 55, no. 4 (2017): 675–91. doi: 10.1353/hph.2017.0070
  • Stern, Robert, ed. Transcendental Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • Strawson, P. F. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen, 1966.
  • Westphal, Kenneth R. Kants Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • Westphal, Kenneth R. “Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy”. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Paul Guyer, 401–30. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.