382
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward a new transcendental aesthetic: Merleau-Ponty’s appraisal of Kant’s philosophical method

Pages 378-401 | Received 10 Sep 2018, Accepted 22 Dec 2018, Published online: 24 Jan 2019

Bibliography

  • Ameriks, Karl. ‘Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument’. In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–66, 2003. Reprint of Kant-Studien 69 (1978): 273–287.
  • Carman, Taylor. ‘The Body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty’. Philosophical Topics 27, no. 2 (1999): 205–226. doi: 10.5840/philtopics199927210
  • Carman, Taylor. ‘Sensation, Judgment, and the Phenomenal Field.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B. Hansen, 50–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Carman, Taylor. Merleau-Ponty. London: Routledge, 2008.
  • Carman, Taylor. ‘Between Empiricism and Intellectualism’. In Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts, edited by Rosalyn Diprose and Jack Reynolds, 44–56. Stocksfield: Acumen, 2008.
  • Coole, Diana. ‘The Aesthetic Realm and the Lifeworld: Kant and Merleau-Ponty’. History of Political Thought 5, no. 3 (1984): 503–526.
  • Dillon, M.C. ‘Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty’. Kant Studien 78 (1978): 403–23.
  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. ‘The Primacy of Phenomenology Over Logical Analysis’. Philosophical Topics, 27 (1999): 3–24. doi: 10.5840/philtopics19992722
  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. ‘Merleau-Ponty and Recent Cognitive Science’. In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B. N. Hansen, 129–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Gallagher, Shaun. ‘Body Schema and Intentionality’. In The Body and the Self, edited by José Luis Bermúdez, Anthony Marcel, and Naomi Eilan, 225–44. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
  • Gallagher, Shaun. ‘Cognitive Science’. In Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts, edited by Rosalyn Diprose, and Jack Reynolds, 207–17. Stocksfield: Acumen, 2008.
  • Gardner, Sebastian. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Transcendental Theory of Perception’. In The Transcendental Turn, edited by Sebastian Gardner, and Matthew Grist, 294–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
  • Gardner, Sebastian. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology in the Light of Kant’s Third Critique and Schelling’s Real-Idealismus’. Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue, eds. Andrew Inkpin and Jack Reynolds 50, no. 1 (2017): 5–25. doi: 10.1007/s11007-016-9393-1
  • Hall, Harrison. ‘The A Priori and the Empirical in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception’. Philosophy Today 23 (1979): 304–09. doi: 10.5840/philtoday19792342
  • Heinämaa, Sara. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Modification of Phenomenology: Cognition, Passion and Philosophy’. Synthese 118 (1999): 49–68. doi: 10.1023/A:1005140809802
  • Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Transl. D. Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff. [CM], 1960.
  • Husserl, Edmund. Formal and Transcendental Logic. Transl. Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff. [FTL], 1969.
  • Inkpin, Andrew. ‘Was Merleau-Ponty a ‘Transcendental’ Phenomenologist?’ Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue: ‘Merleau-Ponty's Gordian Knot: Transcendental Philosophy, Empirical Science and Naturalism,’ edited by Andrew Inkpin and Jack Reynolds, 50, no. 1 (2017): 27–47. doi: 10.1007/s11007-016-9394-0
  • Inkpin, Andrew and Jack Reynolds. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Gordian Knot: Transcendental Philosophy, Empirical Science and Naturalism.’ Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue 50, no. 1 (2017).
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [A/B]. 1998.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [KU]. 2002.
  • Kants gesammelte Schriften. Deutschen [formerly, Königlichen Preussichen] Akademie der Wissenschaften (Eds.). Walter de Gruyter, 1902.
  • Lennon, Kathleen. Imagination and the Imaginary. London: Routledge, 2015.
  • Low, Douglas. ‘Merleau-Ponty and Transcendental Philosophy’. Philosophy Today 57, no. 3 (2013): 279–94. doi: 10.5840/philtoday201357323
  • Matherne, Samantha. ‘The Kantian Roots of Merleau-Ponty's Account of Pathology’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22, no. 1 (2014): 12–49. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2013.876610
  • Matherne, Samantha. ‘Kantian Themes in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Perception’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98, no. 2 (2016): 193–230.
  • Matherne, Samantha. ‘Merleau-Ponty on Abstract Thought in Mathematics and Natural Science’. European Journal of Philosophy 26 (2018): 780–97. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12315
  • Moran, Dermot. ‘Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism’. Continental Philosophy Review 41 no. 4 (2008): 401–425. doi: 10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Structure of Behavior, translated by Alden Fisher. Boston: Beacon Press. [SB]. 1963.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ‘Film and the New Psychology’. In Sense and Non-Sense, translated by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. [Film]. 1964.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ‘The Primacy of Perception.’ In The Primacy of Perception, translated by J. Edie, 12–42. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. [PrP]. 1964.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ‘An Unpublished Texted by Merleau-Ponty.’ In The Primacy of Perception, translated by James Edie. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 3–11, 1964.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible, translated by Alphonso Lingus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. [VI]. 1968.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Prose of the World. Translated by Jack O'Neill. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Nature: Course Notes From the Collège de France, edited by Dominique Séglard and translated by Robert Vallier. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. [N]. 2004.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The World of Perception, translated by Oliver Davis. London: Routledge, 2004.
  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception, translated by D. Landes. London: Routledge. Translated from Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, 1945. [PhP]. 2012.
  • Reynolds, Jack. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s Gordian Knot: Transcendental Phenomenology, Science, and Naturalism’. Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue eds. Andrew Inkpin and Jack Reynolds, 50, no. 1 (2017): 81–104. doi: 10.1007/s11007-016-9395-z
  • Rockmore, Tom. Kant and Phenomenology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
  • Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge 2011.
  • Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. ‘Science in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology: From the Early Work to the Later philosophy’. In Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology, edited by D. Zahavi, 340–359. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • Rouse, Joseph. ‘Merleau-Ponty's Existential Conception of Science.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B. N. Hansen, pp. 265–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Smith, A. D. ‘The Flesh of Perception: Merleau-Ponty and Husserl.’ In Reading Merleau-Ponty, edited by Thomas Baldwin, 1–22. London: Routledge, 2008.
  • Smyth, Bryan. ‘Merleau-Ponty and the “Naturalization” of Phenomenology’. Philosophy Today, 54 (2010): 153–62. doi: 10.5840/philtoday201054Supplement60
  • Smyth, Bryan. Merleau-Ponty’s Existential Phenomenology and the Realization of Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
  • Smyth, Bryan. ‘The Primacy Question in Merleau-Ponty’s Existential Phenomenology’. Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue, eds. Andrew Inkpin and Jack Reynolds, 50, no. 1 (2017): 127–49. doi: 10.1007/s11007-016-9389-x
  • Summa, Michela. ‘Toward a Transcendental Account of Creativity. Kant and Merleau-Ponty on the Creative Power of Judgment and Creativity as Institution’. Continental Philosophy Review, Special Issue, eds. Andrew Inkpin and Jack Reynolds, 50, no. 1 (2017): 105–26. doi: 10.1007/s11007-016-9391-3
  • Zahavi, Dan. ‘Merleau-Ponty on Husserl: A Reappraisal’. In Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl, edited by Ted Toadvine, and Lester Embree, 3–29. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.