322
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Alice Ambrose and early analytic philosophy

Pages 312-335 | Received 30 Sep 2020, Accepted 04 Mar 2021, Published online: 19 Apr 2021

Bibliography

  • Alice Ambrose’s Letters, held in Cambridge University Library (MA Add. 8330 8L/8).
  • Alice Ambrose’s Papers, held in Newnham College Archives (PP Lazerowitz).
  • Ambrose, Alice. “A Critical Discussion of Mind and the World-Order”. The Journal of Philosophy 28, no. 14 (1931): 365–81.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “Finitism in Mathematics [II]”. Mind (New Series) 44 (1935): 317–40.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “Linguistic Approaches to Philosophical Problems”. The Journal of Philosophy 49 (1952): 289–301. Repr. in Alice Ambrose. Essays in Analysis, 142–56. London: Allen and Unwin, 1966 and in The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method, edited by Richard Rorty, 147–55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Portrait”. In Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophy and Language, edited by A. Ambrose and M. Lazerowitz, 13–25. London: Allen and Unwin, 1972.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “The Problem of Linguistic Inadequacy”. In Philosophical Analysis. A Collection of Essays, edited by Max Black, 15–37. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1950. Repr. in Alice Ambrose. Essays in Analysis, 157–81. London: Allen and Unwin, 1966.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “The Revolution in Philosophy: From the Structure of the World to the Structure of Language”. The Massachusetts Review 9, no. 3 (1968): 551–64.
  • Ambrose, Alice. “Wittgenstein on Universals”. In Metaphysics: Readings and Reappraisals, edited by W. E. Kennick and M. Lazerowitz, ch. 7. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966. Repr. in Ambrose, Essays in Analysis, 104–21.
  • Ambrose, A., and M. Lazerowitz, eds. G. E. Moore: Essays in Retrospect. London: Allen and Unwin, 1970.
  • Anderson, C. A. “Alonzo Church’s Contributions to Philosophy and Intensional Logic”. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4, no. 2 (1998): 129–71.
  • Antony, Louise. “Different Voices or Perfect Storm: Why are There So Few Women in Philosophy?”. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (2012): 227–55.
  • Baylis, C. A. “Review of Max Black, Philosophical Analysis. A Collection of Essays, 1950”. Journal of Symbolic Logic 16, no. 4 (1951): 298–301.
  • Beaney, Michael. “Analysis”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/analysis/.
  • Beaney, Michael. “Chronology of Analytic Philosophy and Its Historiography”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 61–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Beaney, Michael. “First Steps and Conceptual Creativity”. In Wittgenstein on Objectivity, Intuition, and Meaning. Edited by James Conant and Sebastian Grève, 119–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  • Beaney, Michael. “Historiography of Analytic Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 30–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Beaney, Michael. “What is Analytic Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 3–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Byrne, A., and J. Barling. “Does a Woman’s High-Status Career Hurt Her Marriage? Not if Her Husband Does the Laundry”. Harvard Business Review, May 2, 2017. https://hbr.org/2017/05/does-a-womans-high-status-career-hurt-her-marriage-not-if-her-husband-does-the-laundry.
  • Chapman, Siobhan. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
  • Chisholm, Roderick. “Comments on the ‘Proposal Theory’ of Philosophy”. The Journal of Philosophy 49, no. 9 (1952): 301–5. repr. in R. Rorty (ed.) The Linguistic Turn, 155–59.
  • Chisholm, Roderick. “Philosophers and Ordinary Language”. Philosophical Review 60, no.1 (1951): 317–328.
  • Church, Alonzo. “Carnap’s Introduction to Semantics”. Philosophical Review 52 (1943): 298–302.
  • Coliva, Annalisa. “Scepticism and Knowledge: Moore’s Proof of an External World”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 975–1002. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Copilowish [Copi], I. M. “Border-line Cases, Vagueness, and Ambiguity”. Philosophy of Science 6 (1939): 181–95.
  • De Pellegrin, Enzo. “The Brown Book of Alice Ambrose”. Wittgenstein Studien 10, no. 1 (2019): 1–36. Jan. 2019.
  • Falzer, P., and L. Davidson. “Language, Logic and Recovery: A Commentary on van Staden”. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 9, no. 2 (2002): 131–6.
  • Flew, Anthony. “Review of Max Black, Philosophical Analysis”. The Philosophical Quarterly 3, no. 12 (1953): 284–6.
  • Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • Frost-Arnold, Greg. “The Rise of ‘Analytic Philosophy: When and How Did People Begin Calling Themselves ‘Analytic Philosophers’?”. In Innovations in the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by S. Lapointe and C. Pincock, 27–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
  • Glock, Hans-Johann. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • Glock, Hans-Johann. “The Influence of Wittgenstein on American Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, edited by Cheryl Misak, 375–402. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Glock, Hans-Johann. “Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 572–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Graff, Delia. “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness”. Philosophical Topics 28 (2000): 45–81.
  • Hacker, P. M. S. “The Linguistic Turn in Analytic Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 926–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Harrah, D. “The Adequacy of Language”. Inquiry 3, no. 1–4 (1960): 73–88.
  • Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. “Susan Stebbing’s Metaphysics and the Status of Common-Sense Truths”. In Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by J. Peijnenburg, and S. Verhaegh. Cham: Springer, forthcoming.
  • Kennick, W. E. “Art and the Ineffable”. The Journal of Philosophy 58, no. 12 (1961): 309–20.
  • Kenny, Anthony. A New History of Western Philosophy Vol. 4: Philosophy in the Modern World. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007.
  • LaVine, Matt. Race, Gender, and the History of Early Analytic Philosophy. Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield, 2020.
  • Loner, David. “Alice Ambrose and Life Unfettered by Philosophy in Wittgenstein’s Cambridge”. JHI Blog, 2016. https://jhiblog.org/2016/02/01/alice-ambrose-and-life-unfettered-by-philosophy-in-wittgensteins-cambridge.
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Letters held in Cambridge University Library (MA Add.8330 8 W/32/39, 30).
  • McGuinness, Brian. Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
  • Misak, Cheryl. “Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 1098–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Monk, Ray. Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage, 1990.
  • Nielsen, Kai. “Meta-philosophy Once Again”. Philo 15, no. 1 (2012): 55–96.
  • Parker-Ryan, S. “Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm's (Moore's) Ordinary Language Analysis”. Essays in Philosophy 11, no. 2 (2010): 123–49.
  • Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, no. 1 (1951): 20–43.
  • Raymont, P. D. “In Search of the Elusive Qualia”. Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia. May 1993.
  • Reese, W. L. “Morris Lazerowitz and Metaphilosophy”, Metaphilosophy 21.1/2 (1990): 28–42.
  • Rorty, Richard. “Introduction”. In The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method, edited by R. Rorty, 1–39. Chicago, IL.: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
  • Russell, Bertrand. “Vagueness”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1923): 84–92.
  • Saul, Jennifer. “Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy”. In Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? edited by Fiona Jenkins and Katrina Hutchison, ch. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Schilpp, Paul. ed. The Philosophy of G.E. Moore, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. IV. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1942.
  • Soames, Scott. “Analytic Philosophy in America”. In The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, edited by Cheryl Misak, 449–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Sorensen, Roy. “Vagueness”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/vagueness/.
  • Stebbing, L. Susan. “The Method of Analysis in Metaphysics”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 33 (1932): 65–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/33.1.65.
  • White, Morton. Towards Reunion in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the ‘Philosophical Investigations. Edited by R. Rhees. London: Harper and Row, 1958.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Cambridge Lectures 1932–35. Edited by A. Ambrose, from notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret MacDonald. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Gesamtbriefwechsel III, InteLex Past Masters, 1997.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value. Edited by G. H. von Wright and Heikki Nyman, and Translated Peter Winch. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. [CV]
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. [PI]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.