Margaret MacDonald’s scientific common-sense philosophy

Bibliography

• Addis, Mark. “Margaret MacDonald”. In Dictionary of Twentieth-Century British Philosophers, edited by Stuart Brown, 601–5. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, Alice, ed. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge 1932–1935, from the Notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret MacDonald. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions”. Social Epistemology 26, no. 2 (2012): 163–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. “A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1957): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J., W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, and R. A. Wollheim. The Revolution in Philosophy. New York: MacMillan, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Beaney, Michael, ed. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beaney, Michael. “The Historiography of Analytic Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 30–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beaney, Michael. “Susan Stebbing on Cambridge and Vienna Analysis”. In The Vienna Circle and Logical Positivism, edited by Friedrich Stadler, 339–50. Dordecht: Kluwer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Gustav. “Two Types of Linguistic Philosophy”. Review of Metaphysics 5, no. 3 (1951): 417–38.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Max. “The Principle of Verifiability”. Analysis 2, no. 1/2 (1934): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Max. “Relations Between Logical Positivism and the Cambridge School of Analysis”. Erkenntnis 8, no. 1 (1939): 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Max, ed. Philosophical Analysis: A Collection of Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Siobhan. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Hasok. “The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25, no. 3 (2011): 205–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donagan, Alan. “Recent Criticisms of Russell’s Analysis of Existence”. Analysis 12, no. 6 (1952): 132–7.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, William R., ed. Aesthetics and Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Emmet, Dorothy M. “The Use of Analogy in Metaphysics”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41 (1940–1): 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Feigl, Herbert, and Wilfrid Sellars, eds. Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Flew, Anthony, ed. Logic and Language (First Series). Oxford: Blackwell, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, P. M. S. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hannay, A. H., John Holloway, and Margaret MacDonald. “Symposium: What Are the Distinctive Features of Arguments Used in Criticism of the Arts?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 23 (1949): 165–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, John. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, Peter, ed. Philosophy, Politics, and Society. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Kevin T. The Logic of Reliable Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, Michael. “Margaret MacDonald and Gilbert Ryle: A Philosophical Friendship”. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Verification and Understanding”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34 (1933–4): 143–56.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Language and Reference”. Analysis 4, no. 2/3 (1936): 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Russell and McTaggart”. Philosophy 11, no. 43 (1936): 322–35.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Reply to Mr MacIver”. Analysis 4, no. 5 (1937): 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Further Reply to Mr MacIver”. Analysis 5, no. 1 (1937): 12–6.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “The Philosopher’s Use of Analogy”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 38 (1938): 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Things and Processes”. Analysis 6, no. 1 (1938): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Review of Philosophy and the Concepts of Modern Science”. Philosophy 13, no. 52 (1938): 500–1.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “The Language of Political Theory”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41 (1940–1): 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Natural Rights”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47 (1946–7): 225–50.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Professor Ryle on the Concept of Mind”. The Philosophical Review 60, no. 1 (1951): 80–90.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret. “Sleeping and Waking”. Mind 62, no. 246 (1953): 202–15.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret, ed. Philosophy and Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Margaret, Gilbert Ryle, and Isaiah Berlin. “Symposium: Induction and Hypothesis”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volume 16 (1937): 20–102.
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, A. M. “Token, Type and Meaning”. Analysis 4, no. 4 (1937): 58–4.
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, A. M. “Rejoinder to Miss MacDonald”. Analysis 4, no. 6 (1937): 81–8.
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, A. M. “Last Words to Miss MacDonald”. Analysis 5, no. 2 (1938): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, A. M. “Some Questions about ‘Know’ and ‘Think’”. Analysis 5, no. 3/4 (1938): 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, Brian F., ed. Wittgenstein und der Wiener Kreis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, Cheryl J. Verificationism: Its History and Prospects. London: Routledge, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, Cheryl J. “The Subterranean Influence of Pragmatism on the Vienna Circle: Peirce, Ramsey, Wittgenstein”. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4, no. 5 (2016): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Eileen. “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History”. In Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions, edited by Janet A. Kourany, 17–62. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, John. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Duckworth, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, and Bernard Linsky. “Verification: The Hysteron Proteron Argument”. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6, no. 6 (2018): 8–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Frank P. “Truth and Probability”. In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, edited by R. B. Braithwaite, 156–98. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. W. “The Origin and Consequences of the Theory of Descriptions”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34 (1933–1934): 211–30.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, Hans. “Logistic Empiricism in Germany and the Present State of its Problems”. The Journal of Philosophy 33, no. 6 (1936): 141–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard M. “Introduction: Metaphilosophical Difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy”. In The Linguistic Turn, edited by Richard M. Rorty, 1–39. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saw, Ruth. “Dr. Margaret MacDonald”. Analysis 16, no. 4 (1956): 73–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schlick, Moritz. “Meaning and Verification”. The Philosophical Review 45, no. 4 (1936): 339–69.
   Google Scholar
• Schlick, Moritz. “Form and Content”. In Gesammelte Aufätze, 1926–1936, edited by Friedrich Waismann, 151–250. Vienna: Gerold & Co, 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. J. C. “Descartes and the Wax”. The Philosophical Quarterly 1, no. 1 (1950): 50–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan. A Modern Introduction to Logic. London: Methuen, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan. Logical Positivism and Analysis. London: Milford, 1933.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan. Philosophy and the Physicists. London: Methuen, 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan. “Some Puzzles about Analysis”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39 (1938–1939): 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan, Leonard J. Russell, and A. E. Heath. “Symposium: Communication and Verification”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 13 (1934): 159–202.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Taube, Mortimer. “Positivism, Science, and History”. The Journal of Philosophy 34, no. 8 (1937): 205–10.
   Google Scholar
• Urmson, J. O. Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Two World Wars. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Waithe, Mary Ellen, ed. A History of Women Philosophers, Volume 4. Dordecht: Kluwer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, G. J. English Philosophy Since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Will, Frederick L. “Is There a Problem of Induction?”. The Journal of Philosophy 39, no. 19 (1942): 505–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Bemerkungen. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Big Typescript: TS 213. Translated and edited by C. Grant Luckhardt and Maximilian A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonathan. “Analytic Political Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Michael Beaney, 795–822. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar