Metaphysical separatism and epistemological autonomy in Frege’s philosophy and beyond

References

• When no translator is mentioned, any translations of quotes are my own.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. [Meta]. “Metaphysics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Barnes, translated by Ross, 1552–1728. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balaguer, Mark. “Platonism in Metaphysics”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Spring, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/rationality-instrumental.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Alan. “Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a Logic.” In Saul Kripke, edited by Berger, 177–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. “Frege on Knowing the Third Realm”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 101 (1992): 633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie, Berlin: Weltkreis. 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, James. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought”. Philosophical Topics 20 (1992): 115–180.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, Michael. Realism and Truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. Frege Philosophy of Language. London: Harper: Row, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. “Realism”. Synthese 52 (1982): 55–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. “Thought and Perception: The Views of Two Philosophical Innovators”. In Frege and Other Philosophers, 263–288. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. “Realism and Anti-Realism”. In The Seas of Language, 462–478. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 87–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry. “XV—The A Prioricity of Logic”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1996): 359–379.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry. “Apriority as an Evaluative Notion”. In New Essays on the a Priori, edited by Peacocke and Boghossian, 117–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift. Halle: Louis Nebert Verlag, 1879.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Logik”. In Nachgelassene Schriften, 1–8, 1879–1891.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. Die Grundlagen Der Arithmetik. Wilhelm Koebner Verlag: Breslau, 1884.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Translated by Austin. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1884.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Über Begriff Und Gegenstand”. Vierteljahrsschrift Für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16 (1892): 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Über Sinn Und Bedeutung”. Zeitschrift Für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. Grundgesetze Der Arithmetik: Begriffsschriftlich Abgeleitet. Vol. 1. Jena: Hermann Pohle Verlag, 1893.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Le Nombre Entier”. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 3 (1895): 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Logik”. In Nachgelassene Schriften, 137–63, 1897.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Kurze Übersicht Meiner Logischen Lehren.” In Nachgelassene Schriften, 213–18, 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Der Gedanke”. Beiträge Zur Philosophie Des Deutschen Idealismus 1 (1918–1919): 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Die Verneinung”. Beiträge Zur Philosophie Des Deutschen Idealismus 1 (1918–1919): 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. “Aufzeichnungen Für Ludwig Darmstaedter.” In Nachgelassene Schriften, 273, 1919.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. Nachgelassene Schriften, edited by Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Bob. “Basic Logical Knowledge”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51 (2002): 279–304.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, C. L. Color for Philosophers: Unweaving the Rainbow. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Gilbert. The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, Richard Kimberly, and Robert May. “Frege’s Contribution to Philosophy of Language”. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by Lepore and Smith, 3–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hjortland, Ole Thomassen. “Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic”. Philosophical Studies 174 (2017): 631–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. Logische Untersuchungen, Erster Theil: Prolegomena Zur Reinen Logik. Leipzig: Veit & Comp, 1900.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, Jim. “Frege on the Generality of Logical Laws”. European Journal of Philosophy 28 (2020): 410–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, Jim. “Frege’s Critical Arguments for Axioms”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (2021): 516–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, Richard. “Moral Anti-Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Winter 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/propositions-structured/, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kroner, Richard. “Über Logische Und Ästhetische Allgemeingültigkeit”. Zeitschrift Für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 134, 135 (1909): 231–266, 10–36, 216–257.
   Google Scholar
• Lotze, Hermann. Logik. Leipzig: Weidman, 1843.
   Google Scholar
• Lotze, Hermann. Metaphysics, in Three Books: Ontology, Cosmology, and Psychology. Translated by Bosanquet. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1887, 1879.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, John. “Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism”. The Philosophical Review 111 (2002): 25–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddy, Penelope. “A Naturalistic Look at Logic”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76 (2002): 61–90.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. “Wittgensteinian 'Quiestism'”. Common Knowledge 15 (2009): 365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, Barry. “The Autonomy of Ethics”. In The Routledge Companion to Metaethics, edited by McPherson and Plunkett, 431–442. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. “Metaethics & the Autonomy of Morality”. Philosopher’s Imprint 8 (2008): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Alexander. “The Significance of Semantic Realism”. Synthese 136 (2003): 191–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Alexander. “Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Winter. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/rationality-instrumental, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Justin. “Normative Principles and the Nature of Mind-Dependence”. Philosophical Studies 179 (2022): 1153–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckhaus, Volker. “Language and Logic in German Post-Hegelian Philosophy”. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 4 (2009): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Kirsten. Why Answer the Epistemic Challenge? University of California, Berkeley: Ph.D dissertation, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Reck, Erich. “Frege on Truth, Judgment, and Objectivity”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (2007): 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, Michael. “Frege as Idealist and Then Realist”. Inquiry 22 (1979): 350–357.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, Thomas. “Objectivity and Objecthood: Frege’s Metaphysics of Judgement”. In Frege Synthesized, edited by Haaparanta and Hintikka. 31–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, Thomas. “Logic and Truth in Frege.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 70: 121–75, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, Russ. Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, Russ. “Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism, and Moral Knowledge”. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (2012): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Skiba, Lukas. “Frege’s Unthinkable Thoughts”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117 (2017): 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Sluga, Hans. “Frege on Meaning”. Ratio 9 (1997): 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberger, Florian. “Frege and Carnap on the Normativity of Logic”. Synthese 194 (2017): 143–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Robert. “Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (2007): 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”. Philosophical Studies 127 (2006): 109–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Barry. “Transcendental Arguments”. The Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968): 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taschek, William. “Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 117 (2008): 375–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, Joan. Frege in Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, Joan. “Realism Bei Frege: Reply to Burge”. Synthese 102 (1995): 363–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, Joan. “Theory and Elucidation: The End of the Age of Innocence”. In Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, edited by Shieh and Floyd, 43–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Cambridge: Blackwell, 2007.
   Google Scholar