An evaluation tool for design quality: PFI sheltered housing

References

• Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order; An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Berkeley, CA: Centre for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behaviour: Personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: a concept analysis. Environment and Behaviour, 8(1), 7–29. doi: 10.1177/001391657600800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugha, C. (1998). Structuring and weighting criteria in multi criteria decision making (MCDM). In T. J. Stewart & R. C. van den Honert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13 International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (pp. 229–242). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, M. E. (1978). A survey of quality and value in building. Watford: Building Research Establishment (BRE).
   Google Scholar
• Burton, E., & Torrington, J. (2007). Designing environments suitable for older people. CME Geriatric Medicine, 9(2), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chalfont, G. (2005). Creating enabling outdoor environments for residents. Nursing and Residential Care, 7(10), 454–457.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. and Reichardt, C. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe Process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 85–102. doi: 10.1080/09613210010008018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). (2005). Design quality and the private finance initiative. London: CABE.
   Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Council (CIC). (2003). Design Quality Indicator. London: CIC.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. Wetherby: Communities and Local Government Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. C. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eley, J. (2004). Design quality in buildings. Building Research & Information, 32(3), 255–260. doi: 10.1080/09613210410001689649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. (2009). Community and ageing: Maintaining quality of life in housing with care settings. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, W., & Hartwich, O. M. (2005). Unaffordable housing: Fables and myths. London: Policy Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M., Salter, A. J., & Whyte, J. K. (2003). Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 318–333. doi: 10.1080/0961321032000107564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddings, B., & Holness, A. (1996). Quality assessment of architectural design and the use of design award schemes. Environments by Design, 1(1), 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, B., Sharma, M., Jones, P., & Jensen, P. (2010). Architectural design quality in local authority private finance initiative projects, Paper presented at the CIB World Congress, Building a Better World, Salford Quays, UK, 10–13 May 2010, Salford: University of Salford, School of the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Groak, S. (2001). Representation in building. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 249–253. doi: 10.1080/01446190010020345
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. (1995). Mental health and the built environment: More than bricks and mortar? London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberger, H. (1998). Lessons for students in architecture. Amsterdam: 010 Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberger, H. (2000). Space and the architect. Amsterdam: 010 Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2008). Competitive dialogue in 2008: OGC/HMT joint guidance on using the procedure. Norwich: Office of Government Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, W., Hillebrandt, P., Greenwood, D., & Kwawu, W. (2006). Procurement in the construction industry: The impact and cost of alternative market and supply processes. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, D. (2010). The housing design handbook: A guide to good practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P. (1991). Environmental aesthetic design: identifying and achieving environmental effects, particularly ‘image’ and ‘atmosphere. Building and Environment, 26(4), 331–340. doi: 10.1016/0360-1323(91)90059-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, T. A. (2003). Lessons from the Design Quality Indicator. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 399–405. doi: 10.1080/0961321032000088016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B., Richardson, D. S., Green, L. R., & Schatten-Jones, E. C. (2002). Psychological well-being and day-to-day social interaction among older adults. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 57–71. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Tyneside Council (2007). Housing strategy 2006–2010. Killingworth: Housing Support and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Government Commerce (2006). Competitive dialogue procedure. London: Office of Government Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Government Commerce (2007). Design quality: Achieving excellence in construction procurement guide. London: Office of Government Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., Barnes, S., McKee., K., Morgan, K., Torrington, J. & Tregenza, P. (2004). Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing and Society, 24, 941–962. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X04002387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., Smyth, J., & McIntosh, I. (2008). Neighbourhood identity: People, time and place. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Serginson, M., Giddings, B., Ladinski, V., & Messer, S. (2013). Assessing effectiveness of architectural design communication through public participation methods. International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 6(1), 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M.2013 Architectural design quality in local authority private finance initiative sheltered housing projects (unpublished doctorate dissertation), Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E. S. (2004). DQI: the dynamics of design values and assessment. Building Research & Information, 32(3), 245–246. doi: 10.1080/0961321042000209461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudha, N., & Baboo, S. (2011). Evolution of new WARM using Likert weight measures (LWM). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 11(5), 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., & Carroll, J. (1984). The psychological study of design. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 8395). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• The National Archives. (n.d.) Building for life. Retrieved September 7, 2012, from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110107165544/http:/www.buildingforlife.org/criteria/.
   Google Scholar
• Treasury Taskforce (2007). Technote 7: How to achieve design quality in PFI projects. London: The Public Enquiry Unit, HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336–1349. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar