Changing collaborative practices through cultural interventions

References

• Adamson, D. M., & Pollington, T. (2006). Change in the construction industry: An account of the UK construction industry reform movement 1993–2003. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell business.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2009). Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40(2), 145–159. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, T., Hällgren, M., Nilsson, A., & Söderholm, A. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boellstroff, T. (2008). Coming to age in second life. An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bologna, R., & Del Nord, R. (2000). Effects of the law reforming public works contracts on the Italian building process. Building Research & Information, 28(2), 109–118. doi: 10.1080/096132100369019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A. & Swan, J. (2005). Implementing change in construction project organizations: Exploring the interplay between structure and agency. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 547–560. doi: 10.1080/09613210500288837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000). Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), 229–237. doi: 10.1080/014461900370852
   Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S., & Hodgson, D. (2006). Making project critical: An introduction. In D. Hodgson & S. Cicmil (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 1–28). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S., & Marshall, D. (2005). Insights into collaboration at the project level: Complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 523–535. doi: 10.1080/09613210500288886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R. (1975). Power, rule and domination. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Commissie Duijvensteijn. (2004). Onderzoek naar infrastructuurprojecten. Eindrapport commissie duijvensteijn. Den Haag: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorée, A. G. (2004). Collusion in the Dutch construction industry: An industrial organization perspective. Building Research & Information, 32(2), 146–156. doi: 10.1080/0961321032000172382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M. F., Ling, F. Y. Y., Ofori, G., & De Silva, N. (2002). Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 30(4), 237–247. doi: 10.1080/09613210110115207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, M., Antunes, R., Fonseca, B., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2008). Using second life in programming's communities of practice. In R. O. Briggs, P. Antunes, G. J. DeVreede, and A. S. Read (Eds.), CRIWG 2008, LNCS 5411 (pp. 99–106). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures [2000]. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, D. (2009). Revisiting the concept of practice: Toward an argumentative understanding of practicing. Management Learning, 40(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graafland, J., & Nijhof, A. (2007). Transparency, market operation and trust in the Dutch construction industry: An exploratory study. Construction Management and Economics, 25(2), 195–205. doi: 10.1080/01446190600830631
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. (2006). The spatial and temporal mediation of social change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 619–639. doi: 10.1108/09534810610686706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C., & Whyte, J. (2010). Emerging hybrid practices in construction design work: The role of mixed media. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), 468–476. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoezen, M. E. L., Rutten, J. V., Voordijk, J. T., & Dewulf, G. (2010). Towards better customized service - contracts through the competitive dialogue procedure. Construction Management and Economics, 28(11), 1177–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Hoezen, M. E. L., Rutten, J. V., Voordijk, J. T., & Dewulf, G. (2012). Towards better customized service-led contracts through the competitive dialogue procedure. Construction Management and Economics, 28(11), 1177–1186. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2010.506517
   Google Scholar
• Josserand, E., Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. S. (2004). Friends or foes? Practicing collaboration – an introduction. M@n@gement, 7(3), 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. Power, Action and Belief: A new sociology of knowledge? Sociological Review monograph, 32, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 264–280.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, S. (2006). Chronicles of the revolution. Building Research & Information, 34(6), 600–603. doi: 10.1080/09613210601004158
   Google Scholar
• McGrath-Champ, S., & Rosewarne, S. (2009). Organizational change in Australian building and construction: Rethinking a unilinear ‘leaning' discourse'. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1111–1128. doi: 10.1080/01446190903236361
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. (1991). Dango – Japan's price-fixing conspiracies. Economics and Politics, 3, 201–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.1991.tb00047.x
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, N. (2006). Understanding power in project settings. In D. Hodgson & S. Cicmil (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 207–231). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, F. (2011). Holistic ethnography: Studying the impact of multiple national identities on post-acquisition organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 654–671. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2007). Studying visual practices in construction. Building Research and Information, 35(5), 576–580. doi: 10.1080/09613210701355732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Knowing in Organizations: A practice-based approach. London: M E Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Nijhof, A., Karssing, E., Wirtz, R., & de Bruijn, T. (2008). En nu doorpakken! Gedragsverandering in de Nederlandse bouwsector. Assen: van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Nocker, M. (2006). The contested object: On projects as emergent spaces. In D. Hodgson & S. Cicmil (Eds.), Making projects critical (pp. 132–154). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713. doi: 10.2307/3069411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Tutt, D., & Dainty, A. (2013). Ethnographic research in the construction industry. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J. (1996). Power and politics in project management. USA: PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Pitch, M., Loch, C., & De Meyer, A. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. (2004). Dutch contracting fraud and governance issues. Building Research & Information, 32(4), 306–312. doi: 10.1080/0961321042000221089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, S. (2005). The power of ‘organizational culture' as a discursive formation in merger integration. Organization Studies, 26(10), 1529–1554. doi: 10.1177/0170840605057072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass [ed. 1996].
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner – how professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction. In K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, H. (1993). Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sense, A., & Antoni, M. (2003). Exploring the politics of learning. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), 487–494. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00063-7
   Google Scholar
• Sminia, H. (2011). Institutional continuity and the Dutch construction industry fiddle. Organization Studies, 32(11), 1559–1585. doi: 10.1177/0170840611425724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, K., & van Marrewijk, A. H. (2012). Chaperoning: Practices of collaboration in the panama canal expansion program. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 440–456. doi: 10.1108/17538371211235317
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2003). Organizing alignment: The case of bridge-building. In D. Nicoline, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations. A practice-based approach (pp. 187–203). London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Survey Committee Construction. (2002). Eindrapport Parlementaire Enquêtecommissie Bouwnijverheid [Final report of Parliamentary Survey Committee Construction]. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 2002–2003, 28 244, nrs. 5–6. Den Haag: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2005). Global corruption report 2005 – Corruption in the construction sector. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, G. (2005). The parliamentary enquiry on fraud in the Dutch construction industry collusion as concept between corruption and state–corporate crime. Crime, Law & Social Change, 44, 133–151. doi: 10.1007/s10611-006-9009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Marrewijk, A. H. (2005). Strategies of cooperation. Commitment and control in a megaproject. M@n@gement, 8(4), 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Van Marrewijk, A. H., Veenswijk, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2010). Organizing reflexivity in designed change; the ethnoventionist approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(3), 212–229. doi: 10.1108/09534811011049572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenswijk, M., van Marrewijk, A. H., & Boersma, K. (2010). Developing new knowledge in collaborative relationships in megaproject alliances: Organizing reflection in the Dutch construction sector. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 4(2), 216–232. doi: 10.1504/IJKMS.2010.030793
   Google Scholar
• Widler, A. (2001). What anchors cultural practices? In K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 74–92). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. (2002). Modelling complex projects. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G. M. (2000). Institutional reform in British construction: Partnering and private finance. Building Research & Information, 28(2), 141–155. doi: 10.1080/096132100369046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.). (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretative turn. Armonk, New York: M E Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Tsoukas, H. (2009). What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1339–1364. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00859.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybema, S., Vroemisse, M., & van Marrewijk, A. H. (2012). Identity work done differently; Creating equality through deconstructing cultural differences in an international NGO partnership. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(1), 48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar