Designing a ‘green’ building: expanding ambitions through social learning

References

• Berardi, U. (2012). Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 411–424. doi:10.1002/sd.532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, P., & Lu, S. (Eds.) (2008). Clients Driving Innovation. Chichester: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., & Finn, R (2005). ‘Remember I'm the bloody architect!’ Architects, organizations and discourses of profession. Work, Employment & Society, 19(4), 775–796. doi:10.1177/0950017005058065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (1999). Building environmental assessments methods: Clarifying intentions. Building Research & Information, 27(4/5), 230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2012). Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 39–53. doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.610608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560. doi:10.1016/S0148–2963(00)00195–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., & Guy, S. (2009). Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2577–2594. doi:10.1177/0042098009344228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., Thuvander, L., & Baumann, H. 2013. Charting corporate greening: Environmental management trends in Sweden. Building Research & Management. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.855873.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Farmer, G. (2001). Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3), 140–148. doi:10.1162/10464880152632451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Moore, S. A. (Eds.). (2005). Sustainable architectures: Cultures and natures in Europe and North America. New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), 239–255. doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.561948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, M. (2010). Influences on innovation in small Australian construction businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 387–402. doi:10.1108/14626001011068699.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. (2006). The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 567–578. doi:10.1080/01446190600790629.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S., Lorenz, D., Dent, P., & Lützkendorf, T. (2013). Professionalism and ethics in a changing economy. Building Research & Information, 41(1), 8–27. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.736201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J., & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization & Environment, 21(4), 390–419. doi:10.1177/1086026608326129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojem, T. S. M. (2012). Bridging two worlds? The troubled transfer of new environmental knowledge from science to consulting engineers. Acta Sociologica, 55, 321–334. doi:10.1177/0001699312460252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojem, T. S. M., & Lagesen, V. A. (2011). Doing environmental concerns in consulting engineering. Journal of Engineering Studies, 3(2), 123–143. doi:10.1080/19378629.2011.585161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S. (2009). Learning for learning economy and social learning. Research Policy, 38, 726–735. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (2007). The interrelationships between building regulations and architects’ practices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 925–943. doi:10.1068/b33024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., & Street, E. (2009). Regulating design: The practices of architecture, governance and control. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2507–2518. doi:10.1177/0042098009346068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, M., & Linderoth, H. C. J. (2010). The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in the construction projects: A Swedish case study. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1), 13–23. doi:10.1080/01446190903406154.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, C. (2004). The tyranny of projects: Teamworking, knowledge production and management in consulting engineering. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25(2), 277–300. doi:10.1177/014383104042492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongsli, G., Ryghaug, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (2008). Miljøarkitekten: Dirigent eller deltaker?. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 20(3), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, K. (2008). Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on constructions projects. Research Policy, 37(10), 1751–1764. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, H. T. (2006). Tro, håp og hybrid ventilasjon. Mål på miljøvennlighet i bygninger. PhD dissertation 2006: 63, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L., & Berker, T. (2013). Passive house at the crossroads: The past and the present of a voluntary standard that managed to bridge the energy efficiency gap. Energy Policy, 60, 586–593. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, C., & Dovey, K. (2008). Fields of sustainable architecture. Journal of Architecture, 13(1), 9–21. doi:10.1080/13602360701865373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M., Tucker, M., Riley, M., & Longden, J. (2009). Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9(2), 201–224. doi:10.1108/14714170910950830.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. C. (2008). Green building assessment systems. A framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 505–519. doi:10.1177/0885412209349589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. C. (2009). Green buildings and building assessment systems: A new area of interest for planners. Journal of Planning Literature, 24, 3–21. doi:10.1177/0885412209349589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(1), 137–150. doi:10.1080/09537320120040491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M. (2003). Towards a sustainable aesthetics: Architects constructing energy efficient buildings. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). How energy efficiency fails in the building industry. Energy Policy, 37(3), 984–991. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008November 20001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Learning technology, constructing culture. Socio-technical change as social learning. STS-working paper, 18/96, Trondheim: Department of interdisciplinary studies of culture.
   Google Scholar
• Tryggestad, K. & Georg, S. (2011). How objects shape logics in construction. Culture and Organization, 17(3), 181–197. doi:10.1080/14759551.2011.569383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tøsse, S. E. (2013). Concern and confidence. Architects making sense of climate adaptation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, advance online publication, doi:10.1068/b38054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25(6), 865–899. doi:10.1016/0048–7333(96)00885–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Slack, R., & Stewart, J. (2005). Social learning in technological innovation – Experimenting with information and communication technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G. (1998). Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding management of innovation in construction. Building Research and Information, 26(5), 268–279. doi:10.1080/096132198369751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar