A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit

References

• Bordass, M., & Leaman, A. (1997). Future buildings and their services: Strategic considerations for designers and clients. Building Research & Information, 25(4), 190–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. ( R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, L. F., Lowe, R., Raslan, R., & Altamirano, H. (2012). Post-occupancy interview report: Key findings from a selection of retrofit for the Future projects. London: Institute for Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforsustainability.co.uk/uploads/File/2236_IFS_POI_Report_Final_05.06.13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, M., & Leaman, A. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., Robinson, J., Brown, Z., & O'Shea, M. (2008). Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• CLG. (2010). Code for sustainable homes: Technical guide. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-for-sustainable-homes-technical-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Despres, C. (1991). The meaning of home: Literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(2), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory evidence and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, C., Powell, J., & Seyfang, G. (2013). Investigating the performance of everyday domestic practices using building monitoring. Building Research & Information, 41(6), 622–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010). Residential heat comfort practices: Understanding users. Building Research and Information, 38(2), 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption – The rebound effect – A survey. Energy Policy, 28, 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., & Chandiwala, S. (2010). Understanding occupants: Feedback techniques for large-scale low-carbon domestic refurbishments. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 530–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Shove, E. (2000). A sociology of energy, building and the environment: Constructing knowledge and designing practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). Theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjri, K., & Crozier, C. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities, 27(1/2), 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, V., & Mitchell, V. (2014). A persona-based approach to domestic energy retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(4). DOI:10.1080/09613218.2014.893161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R. (2009). Studying thermal comfort in context. Building Research & Information, 37(1), 89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R. (2011). Coping with the immediate experience of climate: Regional variations and indoor trajectories. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2), 170–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. H., Gilbertson, J., Oreszczyn, T., Green, G., Ridley, I., & The Warm Front Study Group. (2009). A field study of thermal comfort in low-income dwellings in England before and after energy efficient refurbishment. Building and Environment, 44(6), 1228–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, N. B., & Handegord, G. (1983). Building science for a cold climate. John Sussex: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, A., Moezzi, M., Lutzenhiser, L., & Diamond, R. (2014). Better home energy audit modelling: Incorporating inhabitant behaviours. Building Research & Information, DOI:10.1080/0961321802014.890776.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. P., & Maller, C. (2014). Housing renovations and energy efficiency: Insights from homeowners’ practices. Building Research & Information, 42(4). DOI:10.1080/0961321802014.894808.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A. (2013). Towards systemic domestic retrofit: A social practices approach. Building Research & Information, 41(5), 563–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Shipworth, M., Shipworth, D., Gentry, M., Wright, A., Pollitt, M., … Lomas, K. (2013). Predicting the diversity of internal temperatures from the English residential sector using panel methods. Applied Energy, 102, 601–621.
   Google Scholar
• Khazzoom, J. D. (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy Journal, 1(4), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essay on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: The Probe occupant surveys and their implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R., Chiu, L. F., Raslan, R., & Altamirano, H. (2012). Retrofit insights: Perspectives from an emerging industry. London: Institute for Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.instituteforsustainability.co.uk/uploads/File/KeyFindings
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, R., Chiu, L. F., Raslan, R., & Altamirano, H. (2013). Key findings report: Retrofit project team perspectives. London: Institute for Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforsustainability.co.uk/uploads/File/KeyFindingReports_Retrofit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, R. J. (2000). Defining and meeting the carbon constraints of the 21st century. Building Research & Information, 28(3), 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutzenhiser, L. (1993). Social and behavioural aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 18, 247–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzenhiser, L., Cesafsky, L., Chappells, H., Gossard, M., Moezzi, M., Moran, D., … Whilhite, H. (2009, April). Behavioural assumptions underlying California residential sector energy efficiency programs (A report prepared for California Institute for Energy and Environment). University of California. Retrieved from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/betterbuildings/neighborhoods/pdfs/ba_ee_res_wp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Markus, T. A., & Building Performance Research Unit. (1972). Building performance. Barking: Applied Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Santin, O. G. (2012). Occupant behaviour in energy efficient dwellings: Evidence of a rebound effect. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, H. D. (1992). The Khazzoom–Brookes postulate and neo-classical growth. The Energy Journal, 13(4), 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The time space of human activity: On performance, society and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2011). Where the action is (On large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes), sustainable practices research group. Working Paper, November, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organisation of normality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Chappells, H., Lutzenhiser, L., & Hackett, B. (2008). Comfort in a low carbon society (editorial). Building Research & Information, 36(4), 307–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Los Angeles & London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S., & Dimitropoulos, J. (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 636–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., & Rijal, H. B. (2010). Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 549–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunikka-Blank, M., Chen, J., Britnall, J., & Dantsiou, D. (2010). Improving energy efficiency of social housing areas: a case study of a retrofit achieving an ‘a’ energy performance rating in the U.K. European Planning Studies, 20(1), 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sunikka-Blank, M., & Galvin, R. (2012). Introducing the prebound effect: The gap between performance and actual energy consumption. Building Research & Information, 40(3), 260–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology Strategy Board (TSB). (2009a, April). Retrofit for the future competition for development contracts. London: Author. Retrieved from webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130221185318/http://www.innovateuk.org/_assets/pdf/competition-documents/briefs/sbri-retrofit-8pp_v1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Technology Strategy Board (TSB). (2009b). Retrofit for the future: Phase 1 technical and energy modelling guidance note. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Technology Strategy Board (TSB). (2009c). Retrofit for the future: Evaluating energy and carbon performance in the ‘retrofit for the future’ demonstrator projects. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Technology Strategy Board (TSB). (2013). Retrofit revealed: The retrofit for the future projects – data analysis report. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed, C. (2013). Socio-technical issues in dwelling retrofit. Building Research & Information, 41(5), 551–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlasova, L., & Gram-Hanssen, K. (2014). Incorporating inhabitants’ everyday practices into domestic retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(4). DOI:10.1080/09613218.2014.907682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Cass, N. (2007). Carbon reduction, ‘the public’ and renewable energy: Engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area, 39(4), 458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, C. M., & Reizenstein, J. E. (1980). Post-occupancy evaluation: An overview. Environment and Behaviour, 12(4), 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar