Ecosystem biomimetics for resource use optimization in buildings

References

• Allen, T. (2001). Applying the principles of ecological emergence to building design and construction. In C. J. Kibert, J. Sendzimir, & G. B. Guy (Eds.), Construction ecology: Nature as a basis for green buildings (pp. 108–126). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ayre, M. (2004). Biomimicry – a review. European Space Agency ESTEC. Retrieved from http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/BIO/ACT-RPT-BIO-GSP-BiomimeticsSpaceSystemDesign%20-%20TechnicalNote2b%20-%20Biomimicry-AReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BBC Weather. (2013). Average conditions Harare, Zimbabwe. Retrieved August, 2013 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/890299.
   Google Scholar
• Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy, L. v. (2008). An outline of general system theory. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 10(2), 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Biomimicry 3.8 Institute. (2008). Ask nature. Retrieved August, 2014, from http://www.asknature.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, J. A. (2010). Seven steps to create ecological models for natural resource management. Retrieved December 9, 2012, from http://www.scitopics.com/Seven_steps_to_create_ecological_models_for_natural_resource_management.html
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. T. (2004). A picture is worth a thousand words: Energy systems language and simulation. Ecological Modelling, 178(1–2), 83–100. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, H., & Shu, L. H. (2012, August 12–15, 2012). Automatic extraction of causally related functions from natural-language text for biomimetic design. Paper presented at the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2012). Regenerative design and development: Current theory and practice. Building Research and Information, 40(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.617516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., Muys, B., Bruers, S., Bakshi, B. R., Grubb, G. F., … Sciubba, E. (2008). Exergy: Its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(7), 2221–2232. doi:10.1021/es071719a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DTI, D. o. T. a. I. (2007). Biomimetics: Strategies for product design inspired by nature – A mission to the Netherlands and Germany. Report of a DTI GlobalWatchMission.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis, C. (2011). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 7–22. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.628548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayemi, P.-E., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A., & Bersano, G. (2013). Contextualisation des outils biomimetiques afin de developper une nouvelle methodologie. Paper presented at the Confere 2013, Biarritz.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Galiano, L. (1991). El fuego y la memoria: sobre architectura y energía (1st ed.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, A. (2010). Modeling the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1995). The beginning of system dynamics. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas Salgueiredo, C. (2013). Modeling biological inspiration for innovative design. Paper presented at the 1st Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Gamage, A., & Hyde, R. (2012). A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design. Architectural Science Review, 55(3), 224–235. doi:10.1080/00038628.2012.709406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Holguera, M., Clark, G., Gaskin, S., & Sprecher, A. (2012). Ecosystems Biomimetics: Ecological systems diagrams for characterization of environmental performance of buildings. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 3(2), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Holguera, M., Clark, G., Sprecher, A., & Gaskin, S. (2015). Approaching biomimetics: Optimization of resource use in buildings using a system dynamics modeling tool. Paper presented at the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gebeshuber, I. C., Gruber, P., & Drack, M. (2009). A gaze into the crystal ball: Biomimetics in the year 2059. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 223(12), 2899–2918. doi:10.1243/09544062jmes1563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, P. (2011a). Biomimetics – Materials, structures and processes examples, ideas and case studies. Retrieved from/z-wcorg/database. Retrieved June 2013 from http://site.ebrary.com/id/10483975
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, P. (2011b). Biomimetics in architecture. Architecture of life and buildings. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Farmer, G. (2001). Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3), 140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastrich, C. (2006). The Biomimicry design spiral. Biomimicry Newsletter, 4(1), 5–6. Retrieved from http://biomimicry.typepad.com/newsletter/files/biomimicry_newsletter_v4.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helms, M., Vattam, S. S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: Process and products. Design Studies, 30(5), 606–622. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacklyn, P. (1992). “Magnetic” termite mound surfaces are oriented to suit wind and shade conditions. Oecologia, 91(3), 385–395. doi:10.1007/BF00317628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan, K., & Thomas, S. (2012). Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 7(1), 015002. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/015002
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, S. E., & Svirezhev, Y. (2004). Towards a thermodynamic theory for ecological systems. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. J. (2001). On complexity theory, exergy, and industrial ecology. In C. J. Kibert, J. Sendzimir & G. B. Guy (Eds.), Construction ecology: Nature as a basis for green buildings. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7), 721–742. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00029-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibert, C. J., Sendzimir, J., & Guy, B. (2000). Construction ecology and metabolism: Natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 18(8), 903–916. doi:10.1080/014461900446867
   Google Scholar
• Kofoid, C. A. (1934). Termites and termite control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, M. A., & Crawford, C. (2011). Returning genius to the place. Architectural Design, 81(6), 48–53. doi:10.1002/ad.1319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenau, T. (2009). Biomimetics as a design methodology possibilities and challenges. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2009, Standford, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lepora, N. F., Verschure, P., & Prescott, T. J. (2013). The state of the art in Biomimetics. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 8(1), 013001. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/013001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., Zhu, J., Hui, E. C. M., Leung, B. Y. P., & Li, Q. (2011). An emergy analysis-based methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of building manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1419–1425. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.621341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2015). The nature of positive. Building Research & Information, 43(1), 7–10. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.911565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., & Wright, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsch, W. J., & Jørgensen, S. E. (2003). Ecological engineering: A field whose time has come. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 363–377. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. (1934). Technical syncretism and towards and organic ideology. In W. W. Braham, J. A. Hale & J. S. Sadar (Eds.), Rethinking technology a reader in architectural theory (pp. 53–57). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, W. (1997). Vorbild Natur. Bionik – Design für funktionelles Gestalten. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, E. P. (1977). The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195(4284), 1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odum, H. T. (1994). Ecological and general systems: An introduction to systems ecology. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, H. T. (2001). Material circulation, energy hierarchy, and building construction. In C. J. Kibert, J. Sendzimir & G. B. Guy (Eds.), Construction ecology: Nature as a basis for green buildings. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century: The hierarchy of energy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odum, H. T., & Peterson, N. (1996). Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks. Ecological Modelling, 93(1–3), 155–173. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(95)00221-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M. 1996. Eastgate development Harare. Retrieved September 19, 2014, from http://www.mickpearce.com/works/office-public-buildings/eastgate-development-harare/
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen Zari, M. (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability (paper no. 033). Paper presented at the Sustainable Building Conference, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen Zari, M. (2010). Biomimetic design for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Architectural Science Review, 53(2), 172. doi:10.3763/asre.2008.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen Zari, M. (2012). Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 54–64. doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.628547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen Zari, M. (2014). Ecosystem processes for biomimetic architectural and urban design. Architectural Science Review, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2014.968086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen Zari, M., & Storey, J. (2007). An ecosystem based biomimetic theory for a regenerative built environment. Paper presented at the Lisbon Sustainable Building Conference 07, Lisbon, Portugal, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, T. (2011). Nature as Measure: The Biomimicry guild. Architectural Design, 81(6), 44–47. doi:10.1002/ad.1318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, L. R., & Alberts, J. J. (1988). Concepts of ecosystem ecology: A comparative view (Vol. 67). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I. (1968). Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes. New York: Interscience Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Purves, W. K. (2001). Life, the science of biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. M., Jacklyn, P., & Korb, J. (2014). ‘Magnetic’ termite mounds: Is their unique shape an adaptation to facilitate gas exchange and improve food storage? Insectes Sociaux, 61(1), 41–49. doi:10.1007/s00040-013-0322-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, L. H. (2010). A natural-language approach to biomimetic design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 507–519. doi:10.1017/S0890060410000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, L. H., Ueda, K., Chiu, I., & Cheong, H. (2011). Biologically inspired design. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 60(2), 673–693. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck, T., & Speck, O. (2008). Process sequences in biomimetic research. WIT Tran, 114, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R. S., Braham, W. W., Campbell, D. E., & Curcija, C. D. (2012). Re(De)fining net zero energy: Renewable emergy balance in environmental building design. Building and Environment, 47(0), 300–315. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R. S., Ingwersen, W., Trucco, C., Ries, R., & Campbell, D. (2014). Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings. Building and Environment, 79(0), 138–151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. P., & Bank, L. C. (2010). Use of system dynamics as a decision-making tool in building design and operation. Building and Environment, 45(4), 1006–1015. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. S. (2001). On the mound of Macrotermes michaelseni as an organ of respiratory gas exchange. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 74(6), 798–822. doi:10.1086/323990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. S., & Soar, R. C. (2008). Beyond biomimicry: What termites can tell us about realizing the living building. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Industrialized, Intelligent Construction (I3CON), Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (1992). Convention on biological diversity. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (2009) Buildings and climate change. Report of the Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/sbci/pdfs/SBCI-BCCSummary.pdf (December 2011)
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (2010). Common carbon metric: Protocol for measuring energy use and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from building operations. Draft for pilot testing. Report of the Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/sbci/pdfs/Common-Carbon-Metric-for_Pilot_Testing_220410.pdf (December 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. (2003). Biomimetic modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1437), 1597–1603. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. J. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A.-K. (2006). Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3(9), 471–482. doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J., & Mann, D. L. (2002). Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360(1791), 159–173. doi:10.1098/rsta.2001.0923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasfi, A. (2014). Architecture as a second nature. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 7(2), 3–9. doi:10.5755/j01.sace.7.2.5981
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. O. (2008). A systematic approach to bio-inspired conceptual design. (Ph.D.), Georgia Institute of Technology, Unpublished. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/26483
   Google Scholar
• Worall, M. (2011). Homeostasis in nature: Nest building termites and intelligent buildings. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(2), 87–95. doi:10.1080/17508975.2011.582316
   Google Scholar